Suppr超能文献

马皮肤肉瘤中绵羊乳头瘤病毒DNA的分子检测与定量分析

Molecular Detection and Quantification of Ovine Papillomavirus DNA in Equine Sarcoid.

作者信息

De Falco Francesca, Cutarelli Anna, Pellicanò Roberta, Brandt Sabine, Roperto Sante

机构信息

Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria e Produzioni Animali, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II", Napoli, Italy.

Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Portici, Italy.

出版信息

Transbound Emerg Dis. 2024 Feb 9;2024:6453158. doi: 10.1155/2024/6453158. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Equine sarcoids are caused by infection with bovine papillomavirus (BPV) types 1, 2, and possibly 13. However, a number of sarcoids lack BPV DNA, and new potential etiological agents for sarcoid diseases need to be considered. High-performance digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) was used for the quantitative detection of ovine papillomavirus (OaPV) types 1-4 DNA from 63 sarcoid DNA samples collected in Austria. All samples were comparatively evaluated for OaPV DNA loads by qPCR. Conventional PCR and amplicon sequencing were used to validate the data. Of the 63 sarcoid DNA isolates, ddPCR was able to detect 22 samples harboring OaPV DNA (34.92%), whereas only five of the OaPV-positive samples were revealed by qPCR (22.72%). The differences in detection by ddPCR and qPCR were statistically significant ( < 0.05). The detected OaPV types were OaPV1, 3, and 4. Both methods failed to detect OaPV2 DNA, which could be due to the limited number of examined samples. Importantly, ddPCR detected multiple types of OaPV DNA in seven cases, whereas the qPCR failed to detect multiple infections. This study is the first to provide evidence of the presence of OaPV types 1, 3, and 4 DNA in a subset of equine sarcoids. The comparative detection approach underscores the superior sensitivity of ddPCR compared to that of qPCR.

摘要

马肉瘤是由1型、2型以及可能的13型牛乳头瘤病毒(BPV)感染引起的。然而,许多肉瘤缺乏BPV DNA,因此需要考虑肉瘤疾病新的潜在病原体。本研究采用高效数字液滴聚合酶链反应(ddPCR)对从奥地利收集的63份肉瘤DNA样本中的1-4型绵羊乳头瘤病毒(OaPV)DNA进行定量检测。通过qPCR对所有样本的OaPV DNA载量进行比较评估。采用常规PCR和扩增子测序对数据进行验证。在63份肉瘤DNA分离株中,ddPCR能够检测到22份含有OaPV DNA的样本(34.92%),而qPCR仅检测到5份OaPV阳性样本(22.72%)。ddPCR和qPCR检测结果的差异具有统计学意义(<0.05)。检测到的OaPV类型为OaPV1、3和4。两种方法均未检测到OaPV2 DNA,这可能是由于检测样本数量有限所致。重要的是,ddPCR在7例样本中检测到多种类型的OaPV DNA,而qPCR未能检测到多重感染。本研究首次提供了在一部分马肉瘤中存在OaPV 1、3和4型DNA的证据。对比检测方法强调了ddPCR相较于qPCR具有更高的灵敏度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18fe/12016688/9a5d74fad513/TBED2024-6453158.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验