De Falco Francesca, Cutarelli Anna, D'Alessio Nicola, Cerino Pellegrino, Catoi Cornel, Roperto Sante
Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria e Produzioni Animali, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Portici, Italy.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Nov 22;8:790392. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.790392. eCollection 2021.
Ovine papillomaviruses (OaPVs) were detected and quantified, for the first time, using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) blood samples of 165 clinically healthy sheep. OaPV DNA was detected in 126 blood samples (76.4%). DdPCR detected OaPV DNA in 124 samples; in only two additional samples positive for real-time qPCR, ddPCR failed to detect the presence of any OaPVs. In 70 of the positive samples (55.6%), a single OaPV infection was observed, 12 of which were caused by OaPV1 (17.1%) and 14 by OaPV2 (20%). OaPV3 was responsible for 19 single infections (27.1%), and OaPV4 for 25 single infections (35.7%). Multiple OaPV coinfections were observed in 56 (44.4%) positive samples. OaPV coinfections caused by two genotypes were observed in 31 positive samples (55.4%), with dual OaPV3/OaPV4 infection being the most prevalent as seen in 11 blood samples. In addition, five OaPV1/OaPV4, four OaPV1/OaPV2, four OaPV2/OaPV3, four OaPV1/OaPV3, and three OaPV2/OaPV4 dual coinfections were also detected. OaPV coinfections by triple and quadruple genotypes were detected in 24 (42.8%) and only one (~1.8%) of coinfected blood samples, respectively. Multiple infections caused by OaPV1/OaPV3/OaPV4 genotypes were the most prevalent, as observed in 12 (50%) blood samples harboring triple OaPV infections. This study showed that ddPCR is the most sensitive and accurate assay for OaPV detection and quantification thus outperforming real-time qPCR in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, ddPCR may represent the molecular diagnostic tool of choice, ultimately providing useful insights into OaPV molecular epidemiology and field surveillance.
首次使用滴液数字聚合酶链反应(ddPCR)和实时定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)对165只临床健康绵羊的血液样本进行了绵羊乳头瘤病毒(OaPVs)的检测和定量分析。在126份血液样本(约76.4%)中检测到了OaPV DNA。ddPCR在124份样本中检测到了OaPV DNA;在另外两份实时qPCR呈阳性的样本中,ddPCR未能检测到任何OaPVs的存在。在70份阳性样本(约55.6%)中,观察到单一OaPV感染,其中12例由OaPV1引起(约17.1%),14例由OaPV2引起(20%)。OaPV3导致19例单一感染(约27.1%),OaPV4导致25例单一感染(约35.7%)。在56份(约44.4%)阳性样本中观察到多重OaPV共感染。在31份阳性样本(约55.4%)中观察到由两种基因型引起的OaPV共感染,其中OaPV3/OaPV4双重感染最为常见,在11份血液样本中可见。此外,还检测到5例OaPV1/OaPV4、4例OaPV1/OaPV2、4例OaPV2/OaPV3、4例OaPV1/OaPV3和3例OaPV2/OaPV4双重共感染。在24份(约42.8%)和仅1份(约1.8%)共感染血液样本中分别检测到由三重和四重基因型引起的OaPV共感染。由OaPV1/OaPV3/OaPV4基因型引起的多重感染最为常见,在12份(50%)携带三重OaPV感染的血液样本中观察到。这项研究表明,ddPCR是检测和定量OaPV最灵敏、准确的方法,在灵敏度和特异性方面优于实时qPCR。因此,ddPCR可能是首选的分子诊断工具,最终可为OaPV分子流行病学和现场监测提供有用的见解。