• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于心脏植入式电子设备编程的安全强化学习策略与考量

Strategies and Considerations for Safe Reinforcement Learning in Programming Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.

作者信息

Komp John, Boggaram Aaptha, Kao David P, Trivedi Ashutosh, Rosenberg Michael A

机构信息

College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.

Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

Med Res Arch. 2025 Mar;13(3). doi: 10.18103/mra.v13i3.6363. Epub 2025 Mar 29.

DOI:10.18103/mra.v13i3.6363
PMID:40303558
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12040070/
Abstract

The programming of cardiac implantable electronic devices, such as pacemakers and implantable defibrillators, represents a promising domain for the application of automated learning systems. These systems, leveraging a type of artificial intelligence called reinforcement learning, have the potential to personalize medical treatment by adapting device settings based on an individual's physiological responses. At the core of these self-learning algorithms is the principle of balancing exploration and exploitation. Exploitation refers to the selection of device programming settings previously demonstrated to provide clinical benefit, while exploration refers to the real-time search for adjustments to device programming that could provide an improvement in clinical outcomes for each individual. Exploration is a critical component of the reinforcement learning algorithm, and provides the opportunity to identify settings that could directly benefit individual patients. However, unconstrained exploration poses risks, as an automated change in certain settings may lead to adverse clinical outcomes. To mitigate these risks, several strategies have been proposed to ensure that algorithm-driven programming changes achieve the desired level of individualized optimization without compromising patient safety. In this review, we examine the existing literature on safe reinforcement learning algorithms in automated systems and discuss their potential application to the programming of cardiac implantable electronic devices.

摘要

心脏植入式电子设备(如起搏器和植入式除颤器)的编程是自动学习系统应用的一个有前景的领域。这些系统利用一种称为强化学习的人工智能,有潜力通过根据个体的生理反应调整设备设置来实现个性化医疗。这些自学习算法的核心是平衡探索与利用的原则。利用是指选择先前已证明能提供临床益处的设备编程设置,而探索是指实时搜索对设备编程的调整,以改善每个个体的临床结果。探索是强化学习算法的关键组成部分,为识别可能直接使个体患者受益的设置提供了机会。然而,无约束的探索存在风险,因为某些设置的自动更改可能导致不良临床结果。为降低这些风险,已提出了几种策略,以确保算法驱动的编程更改在不危及患者安全的情况下达到所需的个性化优化水平。在这篇综述中,我们研究了关于自动系统中安全强化学习算法的现有文献,并讨论了它们在心脏植入式电子设备编程中的潜在应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db2f/12040070/1f94e7808f75/nihms-2062835-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db2f/12040070/92855451c3b2/nihms-2062835-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db2f/12040070/329afb44792f/nihms-2062835-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db2f/12040070/fb1e999b1e9c/nihms-2062835-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db2f/12040070/1f94e7808f75/nihms-2062835-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db2f/12040070/92855451c3b2/nihms-2062835-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db2f/12040070/329afb44792f/nihms-2062835-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db2f/12040070/fb1e999b1e9c/nihms-2062835-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db2f/12040070/1f94e7808f75/nihms-2062835-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Strategies and Considerations for Safe Reinforcement Learning in Programming Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.用于心脏植入式电子设备编程的安全强化学习策略与考量
Med Res Arch. 2025 Mar;13(3). doi: 10.18103/mra.v13i3.6363. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
2
Personalized Rate-Response Programming Improves Exercise Tolerance After 6 Months in People With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Heart Failure: A Phase II Study.具有心脏植入式电子设备和心力衰竭的患者,个性化的反应率编程可在 6 个月后提高运动耐量:一项 II 期研究。
Circulation. 2020 May 26;141(21):1693-1703. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.045066. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
3
Perioperative management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.心脏植入式电子设备患者的围手术期管理。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2024 Jun;77(3):306-315. doi: 10.4097/kja.23826. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
4
Optimizing Recovery: A Systematic Scoping Review of Upper Extremity Exercise Immediately after Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation.优化康复:心脏植入式电子设备植入后立即进行上肢运动的系统综述
Cardiology. 2025;150(1):36-47. doi: 10.1159/000538793. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
5
Remote-only monitoring for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a before-and-after pilot study.远程监测心脏植入式电子设备患者:一项前后试点研究。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Jan 25;9(1):E53-E61. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200041. Print 2021 Jan-Mar.
6
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Prophylactic use: an evidence-based analysis.植入式心脏复律除颤器。预防性应用:基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(14):1-74. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
7
Guidelines for the peri-operative management of people with cardiac implantable electronic devices: Guidelines from the British Heart Rhythm Society.心脏植入式电子设备患者围手术期管理指南:英国心脏节律学会指南。
Anaesthesia. 2022 Jul;77(7):808-817. doi: 10.1111/anae.15728. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
8
Sudden Death in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.心脏植入式电子设备患者的猝死。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Aug;175(8):1342-50. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2641.
9
Estimate and reporting of longevity for cardiac implantable electronic devices: a proposal for standardized criteria.心脏植入式电子设备寿命的评估和报告:标准化标准的建议。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021 Dec;18(12):1203-1208. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2021.2013199. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
10
Perioperative Management of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Utility of Magnet Application.心脏植入式电子设备患者的围手术期管理及磁铁应用的效用
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 28;11(3):691. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030691.

本文引用的文献

1
Champion-level drone racing using deep reinforcement learning.使用深度强化学习的冠军级无人机竞速。
Nature. 2023 Aug;620(7976):982-987. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06419-4. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
2
Evaluation of Quantitative Decision-Making for Rhythm Management of Atrial Fibrillation Using Tabular Q-Learning.使用表格 Q 学习评估心房颤动节律管理的定量决策。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 May 2;12(9):e028483. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028483. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
3
Rate-Adaptive Atrial Pacing for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: The RAPID-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.
射血分数保留的心力衰竭的适应性心房起搏:RAPID-HF 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Mar 14;329(10):801-809. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.0675.
4
Rate-Responsive Cardiac Pacing: Technological Solutions and Their Applications.心率反应性心脏起搏:技术解决方案及其应用。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 27;23(3):1427. doi: 10.3390/s23031427.
5
Effect of Personalized Accelerated Pacing on Quality of Life, Physical Activity, and Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Preclinical and Overt Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: The myPACE Randomized Clinical Trial.个性化加速起搏对射血分数保留的临床前和显性心力衰竭患者生活质量、体力活动和心房颤动的影响:myPACE 随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Mar 1;8(3):213-221. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.5320.
6
Applications of machine learning in decision analysis for dose management for dofetilide.机器学习在决策分析中的应用,用于管理多非利特的剂量。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 31;14(12):e0227324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227324. eCollection 2019.
7
Grandmaster level in StarCraft II using multi-agent reinforcement learning.星际争霸 II 中的大师级水平使用多智能体强化学习。
Nature. 2019 Nov;575(7782):350-354. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1724-z. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
8
2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.2018年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心律学会关于心动过缓和心脏传导延迟患者评估与管理的指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组及心律学会的报告
Circulation. 2019 Aug 20;140(8):e382-e482. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000628. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
9
The Artificial Intelligence Clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care.人工智能临床医生学习重症监护中脓毒症的最佳治疗策略。
Nat Med. 2018 Nov;24(11):1716-1720. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0213-5. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
10
A Reinforcement Learning Neural Network for Robotic Manipulator Control.用于机器人操纵器控制的强化学习神经网络
Neural Comput. 2018 Jul;30(7):1983-2004. doi: 10.1162/neco_a_01079. Epub 2018 Apr 13.