• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国成年人癌症筛查接受情况与癌症风险基因检测之间的关联:2017 - 2020年健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS)的结果

Association between cancer screenings uptake and genetic testing for cancer risk among US adults: findings from HINTS 2017-2020.

作者信息

Hong Young-Rock, Wang Ruixuan, Carrier Allison, Ricks-Santi Luisel, Kea Turner, Patel Krupal, Virnig Beth A, Sahin Ilyas, Braithwaite Dejana

机构信息

Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 1516 Clifton Rd, R532, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.

Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Community Genet. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00797-0.

DOI:10.1007/s12687-025-00797-0
PMID:40304964
Abstract

Genetic testing for cancer risk is a vital tool for preventive care, yet its association with the uptake of evidence-based cancer screening remains unclear. This study examined the association between cancer-risk genetic testing and cancer screening uptake using data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (2017 and 2020), a nationally representative sample of US adults. We focused on the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)-recommended screening tests for colorectal (CRC), breast, and cervical cancers. Multivariable logistic regression models, adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical factors, were used to assess the relationship between cancer screening uptake and cancer-risk genetic testing. The analysis included 6,629 respondents (mean age 48.5 years; 50.7% female; 61.1% non-Hispanic White). Of the respondents, 3.3% had undergone genetic testing for cancer risk. Among eligible populations, screening uptake was 85.2% for Pap tests, 80.8% for mammograms, and 81.3% for CRC. Unadjusted analysis showed a significant association between breast cancer screening and genetic testing (p = 0.005), which lost significance after covariate adjustment. Most respondents who underwent genetic testing received result interpretation assistance from healthcare providers and genetic counselors. Among those who received genetic testing, all respondents who received assistance from genetic counselors were adherent to cancer screening recommendations. Our results suggest that while genetic testing was associated with breast cancer screening in unadjusted analyses, this association was not maintained after adjusting for covariates. No significant associations were found between genetic testing and cervical cancer or CRC screening. Further research using prospective designs is needed to examine the effectiveness of genetic testing in enhancing cancer prevention and screening efforts.

摘要

癌症风险基因检测是预防性医疗的重要工具,但其与循证癌症筛查的接受情况之间的关联仍不明确。本研究利用健康信息全国趋势调查(2017年和2020年)的数据,对美国成年人的全国代表性样本进行了分析,以研究癌症风险基因检测与癌症筛查接受情况之间的关联。我们重点关注美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)推荐的结直肠癌(CRC)、乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查测试。使用经过社会人口统计学和临床因素调整的多变量逻辑回归模型来评估癌症筛查接受情况与癌症风险基因检测之间的关系。分析纳入了6629名受访者(平均年龄48.5岁;50.7%为女性;61.1%为非西班牙裔白人)。在受访者中,3.3%的人接受了癌症风险基因检测。在符合条件的人群中,巴氏试验的筛查接受率为85.2%,乳房X光检查为80.8%,CRC为81.3%。未调整分析显示乳腺癌筛查与基因检测之间存在显著关联(p = 0.005),但在协变量调整后这种关联失去了显著性。大多数接受基因检测的受访者从医疗保健提供者和基因咨询师那里获得了结果解读帮助。在接受基因检测的人中,所有从基因咨询师那里获得帮助的受访者都遵守了癌症筛查建议。我们的结果表明,虽然在未调整分析中基因检测与乳腺癌筛查相关,但在调整协变量后这种关联并未持续。未发现基因检测与宫颈癌或CRC筛查之间存在显著关联。需要使用前瞻性设计进行进一步研究,以检验基因检测在加强癌症预防和筛查工作方面的有效性。

相似文献

1
Association between cancer screenings uptake and genetic testing for cancer risk among US adults: findings from HINTS 2017-2020.美国成年人癌症筛查接受情况与癌症风险基因检测之间的关联:2017 - 2020年健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS)的结果
J Community Genet. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00797-0.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.
4
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
Prognostic factors for return to work in breast cancer survivors.乳腺癌幸存者恢复工作的预后因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 7;5(5):CD015124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015124.pub2.
7
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
8
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
9
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
10
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening for Breast Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.乳腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2024 Jun 11;331(22):1918-1930. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.5534.
2
Vital Signs: Mammography Use and Association with Social Determinants of Health and Health-Related Social Needs Among Women - United States, 2022.生命体征:美国2022年女性乳腺钼靶检查的使用情况及其与健康的社会决定因素和与健康相关的社会需求的关联
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2024 Apr 18;73(15):351-357. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7315e1.
3
Comprehensive Inherited Risk Estimation for Risk-Based Breast Cancer Screening in Women.
基于风险的女性乳腺癌筛查综合遗传风险评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 May 1;42(13):1477-1487. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00295. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
4
"For and against" factors influencing participation in personalized breast cancer screening programs: a qualitative systematic review until March 2022.影响参与个性化乳腺癌筛查项目的“支持与反对”因素:截至2022年3月的定性系统评价
Arch Public Health. 2024 Feb 22;82(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01248-x.
5
Breast cancer: A review of risk factors and diagnosis.乳腺癌:危险因素与诊断综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jan 19;103(3):e36905. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036905.
6
Racial differences in knowledge, attitudes, and sources of information about germline cancer genetic testing in the U.S.A.: An analysis of the health information National Trends Survey System.美国关于生殖系癌症基因检测的知识、态度及信息来源的种族差异:健康信息国家趋势调查系统分析
Prev Med. 2024 Jan;178:107779. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107779. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
7
Trends in Up-To-Date Colorectal Cancer Screening Among U.S. Adults Aged 50-75 Years and Variations by Race/Ethnicity and U.S. Census Bureau Divisions.美国50至75岁成年人最新结直肠癌筛查趋势以及按种族/民族和美国人口普查局分区的差异
AJPM Focus. 2022 Dec 10;2(1):100055. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2022.100055. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
The Future of Precision Oncology.精准肿瘤学的未来。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Aug 9;24(16):12613. doi: 10.3390/ijms241612613.
9
Utilization and cost sharing for preventive cancer screenings.癌症预防筛查的利用情况与费用分担
Health Policy Open. 2021 Jun 24;2:100044. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100044. eCollection 2021 Dec.
10
Genetic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility.癌症易感性的基因检测
JAMA. 2023 Jul 3;330(1):30-32. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.9474.