Jheng Yi-Lun, Van de Cruys Sander, De Brabandere Larissa, Maertens Kirsten, Poels Karolien
Department of Training and Educational Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Department of Communication Studies, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):15216. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98709-2.
Health-related misinformation on social media may affect vaccination behavior, particularly among (soon-to-be) mothers. Research suggested different strategies to correct misinformation, but it is unclear which strategies work best for what group and in what situation. Addressing the call for more emotion-based debunking strategies, this study examined how text genre (narrative vs. expository) and harm presence (with vs. without harm-stressing messages) interact to affect emotional responses, and debunking efficacy in corrective texts about vaccination and reproductive health, specifically targeting pregnant or planning-to-be pregnant women (N = 432) with varying levels of vaccine skepticism. We further assessed social media engagement, and information-seeking intentions. In particular, harm presence was tested as a moderator in the relationship between text genre and emotional responses, which in turn, mediate outcomes such as engagement with corrective texts and further information-seeking intentions on social media. Results from an online experimental survey showed that, in general, corrective texts about COVID-19 vaccine misinformation were more effective in reducing misconceptions compared to control texts. For women not skeptical towards vaccination, narratives with harm-stressing messages (vs. no harm) induced most negative emotions, reducing debunking efficacy, social media engagement, and information-seeking intention. For women skeptical towards vaccination, narratives (vs. expository) elicited stronger negative emotions, irrespective of harm-stressing messages, leading to decreased debunking efficacy, social media engagement, and the intention to seek information. This study illuminates the importance of tailoring vaccination corrective texts for different vaccine skepticism groups, avoiding one-size-fits-all strategies and being mindful of strong negative emotions and their counter-persuasive impact.
社交媒体上与健康相关的错误信息可能会影响疫苗接种行为,尤其是在(即将成为)母亲群体中。研究提出了不同的纠正错误信息的策略,但尚不清楚哪种策略在何种群体和何种情况下效果最佳。为响应更多基于情感的辟谣策略的呼吁,本研究考察了文本体裁(叙事性与说明性)和危害呈现(有与无强调危害的信息)如何相互作用以影响情感反应,以及在关于疫苗接种和生殖健康的纠正性文本中的辟谣效果,具体针对不同疫苗怀疑程度的孕妇或计划怀孕的女性(N = 432)。我们还评估了社交媒体参与度和信息寻求意图。特别是,危害呈现被测试为文本体裁与情感反应之间关系的调节变量,情感反应进而介导诸如对纠正性文本的参与度以及在社交媒体上进一步寻求信息的意图等结果。一项在线实验调查的结果表明,总体而言,与对照文本相比,关于新冠疫苗错误信息的纠正性文本在减少误解方面更有效。对于不怀疑疫苗接种的女性,带有强调危害信息的叙事(与无危害信息相比)引发了最多的负面情绪,降低了辟谣效果、社交媒体参与度和信息寻求意图。对于怀疑疫苗接种的女性,叙事(与说明性文本相比)引发了更强烈的负面情绪,无论是否有强调危害的信息,这导致辟谣效果、社交媒体参与度和寻求信息的意图降低。这项研究阐明了针对不同疫苗怀疑群体定制疫苗接种纠正性文本的重要性,避免一刀切的策略,并注意强烈的负面情绪及其反说服影响。