• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何揭穿虚假信息?一项关于文本结构和标题格式的实验性在线研究。

How to debunk misinformation? An experimental online study investigating text structures and headline formats.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Faculty of Life Sciences: Food, Nutrition and Health, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Health Psychol. 2023 Nov;28(4):1097-1112. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12670. Epub 2023 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1111/bjhp.12670
PMID:37263771
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Misinformation is a crucial problem, particularly online, and the success of debunking messages has so far been limited. In this study, we experimentally test how debunking text structure (truth sandwich vs. bottom-heavy) and headline format (statement vs. questions) affect the belief in misinformation across topics of the safety of COVID vaccines and GMO foods.

DESIGN

Experimental online study.

METHODS

A representative German sample of 4906 participants were randomly assigned to reading one of eight debunking messages in the experimentally varied formats and subsequently rated the acceptance of this message and the agreement to misinformation statements about the mentioned topics and an unrefuted control myth.

RESULTS

While the debunking messages specifically decreased the belief in the targeted myth, these beliefs and the acceptance of the debunking message were unaffected by the text structures and headline formats. Yet, they were less successful when addressing individuals with strong pre-existing, incongruent attitudes and distrust in science.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of backfire effects in debunking misinformation is low. Text structure and headline format are of relatively little importance for the effectiveness of debunking messages. Instead, writers may need to pay attention to the text being comprehensive, trustworthy and persuasive to maximize effectiveness.

摘要

目的

错误信息是一个关键问题,尤其是在网络上,而揭穿这些信息的效果迄今为止一直有限。在这项研究中,我们通过实验测试了揭穿信息的文本结构(真相三明治与头重脚轻)和标题格式(陈述与问题)如何跨新冠疫苗和转基因食品安全性等主题影响对错误信息的信任。

设计

实验性在线研究。

方法

一项针对 4906 名具有代表性的德国参与者的随机抽样,他们被随机分配阅读以不同格式呈现的 8 种揭穿信息中的一种,随后对该信息的接受程度以及对所提及主题的错误信息陈述和未经反驳的对照神话的认同程度进行评估。

结果

揭穿信息确实降低了对目标神话的信任,但这些信仰和对揭穿信息的接受不受文本结构和标题格式的影响。然而,当涉及到那些具有强烈预先存在的、不一致的态度和对科学不信任的个体时,这些信息的效果就不太理想。

结论

揭穿错误信息的反向影响风险较低。文本结构和标题格式对于揭穿信息的有效性相对不重要。相反,作者可能需要注意文本的全面性、可信度和说服力,以最大限度地提高效果。

相似文献

1
How to debunk misinformation? An experimental online study investigating text structures and headline formats.如何揭穿虚假信息?一项关于文本结构和标题格式的实验性在线研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2023 Nov;28(4):1097-1112. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12670. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
2
Debunking health myths on the internet: the persuasive effect of (visual) online communication.揭穿互联网上的健康谣言:(视觉)在线交流的说服效果。
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2022;30(8):1823-1835. doi: 10.1007/s10389-022-01694-3. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
3
The Challenge of Debunking Health Misinformation in Dynamic Social Media Conversations: Online Randomized Study of Public Masking During COVID-19.揭穿动态社交媒体对话中健康错误信息的挑战:COVID-19 期间公众戴口罩的在线随机研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 2;24(3):e34831. doi: 10.2196/34831.
4
Promoting COVID-19 vaccine confidence through public responses to misinformation: The joint influence of message source and message content.通过公众对错误信息的反应来增强对 COVID-19 疫苗的信心:信息来源和信息内容的共同影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 May;324:115863. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115863. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
5
The differential effects of a governmental debunking campaign concerning COVID-19 vaccination misinformation.一场关于新冠疫苗接种错误信息的政府辟谣运动的不同影响。
J Commun Healthc. 2023 Mar;16(1):113-121. doi: 10.1080/17538068.2022.2047497. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
6
Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation.破除谣言:反驳错误信息的信息在心理功效方面的元分析
Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;28(11):1531-1546. doi: 10.1177/0956797617714579. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
7
Public sector's misinformation debunking during the public health campaign: a case of Hong Kong.公共部门在公共卫生运动中的辟谣:以香港为例。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Jun 1;38(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad053.
8
Debunking nutrition myths: An experimental test of the 'truth sandwich' text format.揭穿营养误区:对“真相三明治”文本格式的实验测试。
Br J Health Psychol. 2023 Nov;28(4):1000-1010. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12665. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
9
Evaluation of a template for countering misinformation-Real-world Autism treatment myth debunking.评估一个反假信息模板——真实世界的自闭症治疗神话揭穿。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 30;14(1):e0210746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210746. eCollection 2019.
10
A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial.在荷兰开展的一项针对老年人的数字随机试验:运用辟谣内容与非辟谣内容的媒体干预措施来对抗疫苗错误信息
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 May 15;35:100881. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100881. eCollection 2021 May.

引用本文的文献

1
Prebunking and credible source corrections increase election credibility: Evidence from the US and Brazil.预先辟谣和可靠来源纠正可提高选举可信度:来自美国和巴西的证据。
Sci Adv. 2025 Aug 29;11(35):eadv3758. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adv3758.
2
The truth sandwich format does not enhance the correction of misinformation.事实三明治格式并不能增强对错误信息的纠正。
J Educ Psychol. 2025 Aug;117(6):851-862. doi: 10.1037/edu0000961.
3
Investigating epistemic emotions experienced while reading refutation texts through a fine-grained measure of emotion.
通过对情绪的细粒度测量来研究阅读反驳性文本时所体验到的认知情绪。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2025 May 15;10(1):30. doi: 10.1038/s41539-025-00324-3.
4
Strategies to correct vaccine misinformation on social media for pregnant women and the impact of vaccine skepticism.纠正社交媒体上针对孕妇的疫苗错误信息的策略以及疫苗怀疑论的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):15216. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98709-2.
5
Comparing the effectiveness of animated videos and talking-head videos in science communication.比较动画视频和真人出镜视频在科学传播中的效果。
Br J Health Psychol. 2025 Feb;30(1):e12786. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12786.