• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国对非美国人隐性偏见的认知基础及生态关联

Cognitive underpinnings and ecological correlates of implicit bias against non-Americans in the United States.

作者信息

Kurdi Benedek, Okura Keitaro, Hehman Eric, Ferguson Melissa J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, 61820, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):15191. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98384-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-98384-3
PMID:40307413
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12044061/
Abstract

Of the 330 million residents of the United States, over 40 million were born abroad. Such individuals are routinely referred to using labels such as "alien," "foreigner," and "noncitizen." In this multimethod project relying on data from 5437 U.S. citizens in experimental studies and 193,649 U.S. citizens in archival studies, we examine implicit (automatic) evaluations of non-Americans in the United States, their effects on impression formation, and their ecological correlates in the form of real-life outcomes. In Studies 1A-1C, the labels "alien," "foreigner," and "noncitizen" were found to be highly and similarly implicitly negative. In Studies 2A-2D, applying these labels to specific individuals created immediate implicit negativity toward them, irrespective of their gender or race. Finally, pro-American/anti-foreigner implicit evaluations predicted anti-immigrant policy positions at the level of individuals (Study 3A), and a conceptually and statistically related implicit White-American/Asian-foreign implicit stereotype predicted anti-immigrant voting patterns in 18 relevant ballot initiatives at the level of U.S. counties (Study 3B). Across studies, implicit anti-foreigner bias generalized across participant demographics but was somewhat stronger among men and political conservatives. Together, this work highlights the cognitive underpinnings and real-world correlates of robust and pervasive anti-foreigner biases in the United States.

摘要

在美国的3.3亿居民中,超过4000万人出生在国外。这类人通常会被贴上“外国人”“外地人”和“非公民”等标签。在这个多方法项目中,我们利用实验研究中5437名美国公民的数据以及档案研究中193,649名美国公民的数据,考察了美国人对非美国人的内隐(自动)评价、这些评价对印象形成的影响以及它们在现实生活结果方面的生态关联。在研究1A至1C中,发现“外国人”“外地人”和“非公民”这些标签具有高度且相似的内隐负面性。在研究2A至2D中,将这些标签应用于特定个体时,会立即产生对他们的内隐负面态度,无论其性别或种族如何。最后,亲美/反外国人的内隐评价在个体层面预测了反移民政策立场(研究3A),并且一个在概念和统计上相关的内隐白人-美国人/亚洲-外国人刻板印象在美国各县层面预测了18项相关投票倡议中的反移民投票模式(研究3B)。在各项研究中,内隐的反外国人偏见在不同参与者人口统计特征中普遍存在,但在男性和政治保守派中略强。总的来说,这项工作凸显了美国强烈且普遍存在的反外国人偏见的认知基础和现实世界关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/792d/12044061/ef46d6ba64e4/41598_2025_98384_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/792d/12044061/1d2e81219635/41598_2025_98384_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/792d/12044061/ade729a4d58d/41598_2025_98384_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/792d/12044061/a981bc859fff/41598_2025_98384_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/792d/12044061/c99cac5055ed/41598_2025_98384_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/792d/12044061/2bda0190d4d0/41598_2025_98384_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/792d/12044061/84eef74da48e/41598_2025_98384_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/792d/12044061/ef46d6ba64e4/41598_2025_98384_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/792d/12044061/1d2e81219635/41598_2025_98384_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/792d/12044061/ade729a4d58d/41598_2025_98384_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/792d/12044061/a981bc859fff/41598_2025_98384_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/792d/12044061/c99cac5055ed/41598_2025_98384_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/792d/12044061/2bda0190d4d0/41598_2025_98384_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/792d/12044061/84eef74da48e/41598_2025_98384_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/792d/12044061/ef46d6ba64e4/41598_2025_98384_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cognitive underpinnings and ecological correlates of implicit bias against non-Americans in the United States.美国对非美国人隐性偏见的认知基础及生态关联
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):15191. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98384-3.
2
Where are you from? A validation of the Foreigner Objectification Scale and the psychological correlates of foreigner objectification among Asian Americans and Latinos.你来自哪里?《外国人客观化量表》的验证以及亚洲裔美国人和拉丁裔中外国人客观化的心理相关因素。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2013 Apr;19(2):131-142. doi: 10.1037/a0031547.
3
Who is American? A comprehensive analysis of the American = White/Foreign = Asian stereotype (2007-2023).谁是美国人?对“美国人 = 白人/外国人 = 亚洲人”刻板印象的全面分析(2007 - 2023年)
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 27;15(1):3368. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83794-6.
4
Does county-level implicit national exclusion predict political participation among Asian Americans?县级隐性民族排斥是否预测亚裔美国人的政治参与?
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2023 Oct;29(4):530-539. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000595. Epub 2023 May 25.
5
Implicit and explicit racial prejudice and stereotyping toward Black (vs. White) Americans: The prevalence and variation among genetic counselors in North America.对美国黑人(与白人相比)的内隐和外显种族偏见和刻板印象:北美的遗传咨询师中的流行程度和变化。
J Genet Couns. 2023 Apr;32(2):397-410. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1648. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
6
Correction to Armenta et al. (2013).对阿门塔等人(2013年)的勘误
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2015 Apr;21(2):267. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000050.
7
A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?疑虑重重:骨科手术教员和住院医师在种族和性别方面是否存在隐性偏见?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1145-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002933. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
8
Implicit Evaluative Biases Toward Targets Varying in Race and Socioeconomic Status.内隐评价偏差对不同种族和社会经济地位目标的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Oct;45(10):1512-1527. doi: 10.1177/0146167219835230. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
9
Association of Maternal Citizenship and State-Level Immigrant Policies With Health Insurance Coverage Among US-Born Latino Youths.母亲的公民身份和州级移民政策与美国出生的拉丁裔青年健康保险覆盖之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2021876. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21876.
10
Intergroup anxiety effects on implicit racial evaluation and stereotyping.群体间焦虑对内隐种族评价和刻板印象的影响。
Emotion. 2012 Dec;12(6):1273-80. doi: 10.1037/a0029016. Epub 2012 Jul 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Immigration documentation statuses evoke racialized faceism in mental representations.移民文件身份在心理表象中引发了种族主义的面容歧视。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 9;14(1):10673. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61203-2.
2
Responsible data sharing: Identifying and remedying possible re-identification of human participants.负责任的数据共享:识别并纠正人类受试者可能被重新识别的情况。
Am Psychol. 2024 May 6. doi: 10.1037/amp0001346.
3
America's racial framework of superiority and Americanness embedded in natural language.美国的优越种族框架以及蕴含在自然语言中的美国特性。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jan 2;3(1):pgad485. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad485. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
A systemic approach to the psychology of racial bias within individuals and society.一种针对个体和社会中种族偏见心理的系统方法。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2023 May 18:1-15. doi: 10.1038/s44159-023-00190-z.
5
A 3D framework of implicit attitude change.一个内隐态度改变的三维框架。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Aug;27(8):745-758. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.05.009. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
6
Does county-level implicit national exclusion predict political participation among Asian Americans?县级隐性民族排斥是否预测亚裔美国人的政治参与?
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2023 Oct;29(4):530-539. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000595. Epub 2023 May 25.
7
Systemic racism: individuals and interactions, institutions and society.系统性种族主义:个体与互动、制度与社会。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Dec 20;6(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00349-3.
8
Implicit bias reflects systemic racism.内隐偏见反映了系统性种族主义。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Nov;25(11):927-936. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
9
The generalizability crisis.普遍性危机。
Behav Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 21;45:e1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X20001685.
10
Prejudice Reduction: Progress and Challenges.偏见减少:进展与挑战。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2021 Jan 4;72:533-560. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-071620-030619. Epub 2020 Sep 14.