Suppr超能文献

基于人工智能的可交付自动容积弧形放射治疗计划在妇科癌症全盆腔放疗中的评估。

Evaluation of deliverable artificial intelligence-based automated volumetric arc radiation therapy planning for whole pelvic radiation in gynecologic cancer.

作者信息

Xiao Yushan, Tanaka Shohei, Kadoya Noriyuki, Sato Kiyokazu, Kimura Yuto, Umezawa Rei, Katsuta Yoshiyuki, Arai Kazuhiro, Takahashi Haruna, Hoshino Taichi, Jingu Keiichi

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.

Radiation Technology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):15219. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99717-y.

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a deep learning (DL)-based deliverable whole pelvic volumetric arc radiation therapy (VMAT) for patients with gynecologic cancer using a prototype DL-based automated planning support system, named RatoGuide, to evaluate its clinical validity. In our hospital, 110 patients with gynecologic cancer were registered. The prescribed dose was 50.4 Gy/28 fr. A DL-based three-dimensional dose prediction model was first trained by the dose distribution and structure data of whole pelvic VMAT (n = 100) created on the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS). The structure data of the test data (n = 10) were then input to RatoGuide, and RatoGuide predicted the dose distribution of the whole pelvic VMAT plan (PreDose). We established deliverable plans with Monaco and Eclipse TPS (DeliDose) based on PreDose and vendor-supplied optimization objectives. Medical physicists then manually developed plans (CliDose) for the test data. Finally, we evaluated and compared the dose distribution and dose constraints of PreDose, DeliDose, and CliDose. DeliDose, in both Eclipse and Monaco, was comparable to PreDose in most Dose constraints, planning target volume (PTV) coverage, and Dmax of the bladder, rectum, and bowel bag were better for DeliDose than for PreDose. Additionally, DeliDose demonstrated no significant difference from CliDose in most dose constraints. The blinded average scores of radiation oncologists for DeliDose and CliDose were 4.2 ± 0.4 and 4.3 ± 0.5, respectively, in Eclipse, and 4.0 ± 0.6 and 3.9 ± 0.5, respectively, in Monaco (5 is the max score and 3 is clinically acceptable). We indicated that RatoGuide can eliminate variations in plan quality between hospitals in whole pelvic VMAT irradiation and help develop VMAT plans in a short time.

摘要

本研究旨在使用名为RatoGuide的基于深度学习(DL)的自动化计划支持原型系统,为妇科癌症患者开发基于深度学习的可交付全盆腔容积弧形调强放射治疗(VMAT),以评估其临床有效性。在我院,登记了110例妇科癌症患者。处方剂量为50.4 Gy/28次分割。首先,基于在Monaco治疗计划系统(TPS)上创建的全盆腔VMAT(n = 100)的剂量分布和结构数据,训练基于DL的三维剂量预测模型。然后将测试数据(n = 10)的结构数据输入RatoGuide,RatoGuide预测全盆腔VMAT计划的剂量分布(预剂量)。我们基于预剂量和供应商提供的优化目标,使用Monaco和Eclipse TPS建立可交付计划(交付剂量)。然后医学物理师为测试数据手动制定计划(临床剂量)。最后,我们评估并比较了预剂量、交付剂量和临床剂量的剂量分布和剂量限制。在Eclipse和Monaco中,交付剂量在大多数剂量限制方面与预剂量相当,膀胱、直肠和肠袋的计划靶体积(PTV)覆盖率和Dmax,交付剂量比预剂量更好。此外,在大多数剂量限制方面,交付剂量与临床剂量无显著差异。在Eclipse中,放射肿瘤学家对交付剂量和临床剂量的盲法平均评分分别为4.2±0.4和4.3±0.5,在Monaco中分别为4.0±0.6和3.9±0.5(满分5分,3分临床可接受)。我们表明,RatoGuide可以消除全盆腔VMAT照射中医院间计划质量的差异,并有助于在短时间内制定VMAT计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b52/12043927/5aa90a57e012/41598_2025_99717_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验