Suppr超能文献

评估疾病严重程度指数(序贯器官衰竭评估、简化急性生理学评分III和死亡率预测模型II)对入住重症监护病房的COVID-19患者死亡率的预测性能:一项回顾性横断面研究。

Evaluation of the performance of disease severity indices (SOFA, SAPS III, and MPM II) for the prediction of mortality rate in COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care units: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Basiri Reza, Ahmadi Hekmatikar Hanieh, Najafzadeh Mohammad Javad, Baniasad Amir

机构信息

Lung Disease Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Faculty of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):637. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11045-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic created a high demand for hospital beds and intensive care, which led to the collapse of healthcare systems. Therefore, it is critical to identify factors associated with increased mortality in patients to prioritize high-risk individuals.

AIM

Given the potential for similar pandemics in the future, this study investigated predictors of mortality in ICU patients with COVID-19 and their correlation with mortality rates.

STUDY DESIGN

In this retrospective study, all patients admitted to the ICUs of Ghaem and Imam Reza tertiary hospitals in Mashhad with a definitive diagnosis of COVID-19 from March 21, 2020, to December 1, 2021, were evaluated for disease severity assessment criteria, including SOFA, SAPS III, and MPM II.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-two patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to the ICU were evaluated (147 patients in the non-survivor group and 25 patients in the survivor group. The median SAPS, SOFA, and MPM scores were significantly higher in non-survivors (p<0.001 in all cases). Higher SAPS, SOFA, and MPM were associated with an increased risk of mortality in COVID-19 patients in the ICU. The best cut-off points for the three scoring systems, SAPS, SOFA, and MPM, were 39, 6, and 13.7, respectively. The AUC value of the SOFA score was significantly higher than the SAPS (P = 0.0274) and MPM (P = 0.0209) scores.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU with higher SOFA, MPM, and SAPS scores suffered from higher mortality rates. Because the SOFA score showed high predictive accuracy, this scoring system should be considered a priority as an essential tool in triaging and managing critically ill COVID-19 patients.

摘要

背景

新冠疫情导致对医院病床和重症监护的需求激增,进而造成医疗系统崩溃。因此,识别与患者死亡率增加相关的因素对于确定高危个体的优先级至关重要。

目的

鉴于未来可能发生类似疫情,本研究调查了新冠重症监护病房(ICU)患者的死亡预测因素及其与死亡率的相关性。

研究设计

在这项回顾性研究中,对2020年3月21日至2021年12月1日期间在马什哈德的加姆和伊玛目礼萨三级医院ICU确诊为新冠的所有患者进行了评估,以确定疾病严重程度评估标准,包括序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、简化急性生理学评分III(SAPS III)和死亡率预测模型II(MPM II)。

结果

对172例入住ICU的新冠患者进行了评估(非存活组147例,存活组25例)。非存活者的SAPS、SOFA和MPM评分中位数显著更高(所有情况下p<0.001)。较高的SAPS、SOFA和MPM与ICU中新冠患者的死亡风险增加相关。SAPS、SOFA和MPM这三个评分系统的最佳截断点分别为39、6和13.7。SOFA评分的曲线下面积(AUC)值显著高于SAPS(P = 0.0274)和MPM(P = 0.0209)评分。

结论

入住ICU的新冠患者,若SOFA、MPM和SAPS评分较高,则死亡率较高。由于SOFA评分显示出较高的预测准确性,该评分系统应被视为对危重新冠患者进行分诊和管理的重要工具的优先选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验