Magateshvaren Saras Murali Aadhitya, Mitra Mithun K, Tyagi Sonika
IITB-Monash Research Academy, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400076, India.
Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400076, India.
Biol Methods Protoc. 2025 Apr 17;10(1):bpaf028. doi: 10.1093/biomethods/bpaf028. eCollection 2025.
The application of machine learning (ML) techniques in predictive modelling has greatly advanced our comprehension of biological systems. There is a notable shift in the trend towards integration methods that specifically target the simultaneous analysis of multiple modes or types of data, showcasing superior results compared to individual analyses. Despite the availability of diverse ML architectures for researchers interested in embracing a multimodal approach, the current literature lacks a comprehensive taxonomy that includes the pros and cons of these methods to guide the entire process. Closing this gap is imperative, necessitating the creation of a robust framework. This framework should not only categorize the diverse ML architectures suitable for multimodal analysis but also offer insights into their respective advantages and limitations. Additionally, such a framework can serve as a valuable guide for selecting an appropriate workflow for multimodal analysis. This comprehensive taxonomy would provide a clear guidance and support informed decision-making within the progressively intricate landscape of biomedical and clinical data analysis. This is an essential step towards advancing personalized medicine. The aims of the work are to comprehensively study and describe the harmonization processes that are performed and reported in the literature and present a working guide that would enable planning and selecting an appropriate integrative model. We present harmonization as a dual process of representation and integration, each with multiple methods and categories. The taxonomy of the various representation and integration methods are classified into six broad categories and detailed with the advantages, disadvantages and examples. A guide flowchart describing the step-by-step processes that are needed to adopt a multimodal approach is also presented along with examples and references. This review provides a thorough taxonomy of methods for harmonizing multimodal data and introduces a foundational 10-step guide for newcomers to implement a multimodal workflow.
机器学习(ML)技术在预测建模中的应用极大地增进了我们对生物系统的理解。在趋势上有一个显著转变,即朝着专门针对同时分析多种模式或类型数据的整合方法发展,与单独分析相比,这些方法展现出更优的结果。尽管对于有兴趣采用多模态方法的研究人员而言有多种ML架构可供选择,但当前文献缺乏一个全面的分类法,其中包括这些方法的优缺点以指导整个过程。弥补这一差距势在必行,需要创建一个强大的框架。这个框架不仅应将适用于多模态分析的各种ML架构进行分类,还应深入了解它们各自的优点和局限性。此外,这样一个框架可以作为选择多模态分析合适工作流程的宝贵指南。这种全面的分类法将在日益复杂的生物医学和临床数据分析领域提供明确的指导并支持明智的决策。这是推进个性化医疗的关键一步。这项工作的目的是全面研究和描述文献中执行和报告的协调过程,并提出一个实用指南,以实现规划和选择合适的整合模型。我们将协调描述为一个表示和整合的双重过程,每个过程都有多种方法和类别。各种表示和整合方法的分类法分为六大类,并详细说明了其优点、缺点和示例。还给出了一个描述采用多模态方法所需的逐步过程的指南流程图以及示例和参考文献。本综述提供了用于协调多模态数据的方法的全面分类法,并为新手引入了一个实施多模态工作流程的基础10步指南。