Xiong Ding, Tong Chee San, Wu Min
State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Department of Cell Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, 06520-8002, USA.
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2025 Jun;94:102523. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2025.102523. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
Calcium (Ca) oscillations, marked by periodic fluctuations in cytosolic Ca levels, are a universal feature of both excitable and non-excitable cells, regulating key functions like immune responses, neuronal activity and oocyte activation. Despite significant progress over the past few decades in identifying the molecular toolkits involved in Ca mobilization, fundamental questions remain unresolved: How do Caoscillations arise? In dynamical systems, oscillations arise as closed-loop trajectories in phase space, known as limit cycles. In this framework, [Ca] is the variable that oscillates along the limit cycle. Is [Ca] also the control parameter that defines the system's stability? Understanding how oscillations arise and how instability is controlled are essential for determining what these oscillations encode. This review revisits classic categorizations of Ca oscillation models, focusing on the minimal mathematical models, their assumptions and gaps linking models with experimental data. We examine historical arguments in light of recent discoveries of plasma membrane lipid oscillations in non-excitable cells. While growing evidence support the pivotal role of lipid signaling in regulating Ca dynamics, they mostly focused on the upstream role of signaling in Ca mobilization, rather than viewing membrane-dependent signal transduction as the core control loop that is responsible for oscillatory Ca dynamics. Here we summarize recent molecular studies of phosphoinositide signaling in modulating Ca dynamics, by considering a broader chemical perspective as essential for understanding Ca oscillations beyond ion fluxes.
钙(Ca)振荡以胞质钙水平的周期性波动为特征,是可兴奋细胞和不可兴奋细胞的普遍特征,调节着免疫反应、神经元活动和卵母细胞激活等关键功能。尽管在过去几十年里,在确定参与钙动员的分子工具方面取得了重大进展,但一些基本问题仍未得到解决:钙振荡是如何产生的?在动力系统中,振荡作为相空间中的闭环轨迹出现,称为极限环。在这个框架中,[Ca]是沿着极限环振荡的变量。[Ca]也是定义系统稳定性的控制参数吗?理解振荡如何产生以及不稳定性如何控制对于确定这些振荡编码的内容至关重要。本综述重新审视了钙振荡模型的经典分类,重点关注最小数学模型、它们的假设以及将模型与实验数据联系起来的差距。我们根据非可兴奋细胞中质膜脂质振荡的最新发现来审视历史观点。虽然越来越多的证据支持脂质信号在调节钙动力学中的关键作用,但它们大多集中在信号在钙动员中的上游作用,而不是将膜依赖性信号转导视为负责振荡性钙动力学的核心控制环。在这里,我们通过考虑更广泛的化学视角(这对于理解超越离子通量的钙振荡至关重要),总结了磷脂酰肌醇信号在调节钙动力学方面的最新分子研究。