Suppr超能文献

单独微针治疗及联合注射透明质酸用于增加种植体周围软组织的疗效评估:一项随机对照试验。

Evaluation of the efficacy of microneedling alone and in combination with injectable hyaluronic acid in augmentation of peri-implant soft tissues: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Bawankar Pranjali Vijaykumar, Tuli Prabhnoor, Kolte Abhay P, Kolte Rajashri Abhay

机构信息

Department of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry, Ranjeet Deshmukh Dental College and Research Centre, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2024 Nov-Dec;28(6):643-650. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_158_24. Epub 2025 Apr 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of injectable hyaluronic acid (HA) combined with microneedling (MN) in augmenting peri-implant soft tissue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-five patients were enrolled and divided into two groups. Group 1 received MN alone, while Group 2 received HA following MN on the peri-implant mucosa. Various parameters - including the plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), peri-implant probing depth, clinical attachment levels, Sulcus Bleeding Index, mucosal thickness (MT), keratinized tissue width (KTW), interproximal width (IPW), and papillary recession height (PRH) - were evaluated at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Patient-reported outcome measures were assessed to gauge treatment effectiveness and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Group 2 patients exhibited reduced PI, GI, SBI, PIPD, and CAL compared to Group 1. Both groups showed a significant increase in MT and KTW after 6 months; MT increased to 1.03 ± 0.11 mm in Group 1 and 2.48 ± 0.45 mm in Group 2, while KTW increased to 2.44 ± 0.84 mm in Group 1 and 4.34 ± 1.02 mm in Group 2. In addition, the mean PRH was 1.67 ± 0.32 mm in Group 1 and 0.88 ± 0.25 mm in Group 2, with a mean IPW of 2.19 ± 0.52 mm in Group 1 and 0.90 ± 0.16 mm in Group 2.

CONCLUSION

HA combined with MN leads to increased MT and KTW, reduced inflammation, and improved papillary fill. Thus, HA with MN may serve as an effective short-term implant maintenance modality, assisting clinicians in achieving peri-implant soft tissue regeneration.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估注射用透明质酸(HA)联合微针(MN)在增加种植体周围软组织方面的疗效。

材料与方法

纳入65例患者并分为两组。第1组仅接受微针治疗,而第2组在种植体周围黏膜进行微针治疗后接受透明质酸治疗。在基线、术后3个月和6个月时评估各种参数,包括菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)、种植体周围探诊深度、临床附着水平、龈沟出血指数、黏膜厚度(MT)、角化组织宽度(KTW)、邻间隙宽度(IPW)和乳头退缩高度(PRH)。评估患者报告的结局指标以衡量治疗效果和患者满意度。

结果

与第1组相比,第2组患者的PI、GI、SBI、PIPD和CAL降低。两组在6个月后MT和KTW均显著增加;第1组MT增加至1.03±0.11mm,第2组增加至2.48±0.45mm,而第1组KTW增加至2.44±0.84mm,第2组增加至4.34±1.02mm。此外,第1组平均PRH为1.67±0.32mm,第2组为0.88±0.25mm,第1组平均IPW为2.19±0.52mm,第2组为0.90±0.16mm。

结论

透明质酸联合微针可导致MT和KTW增加、炎症减轻以及乳头填充改善。因此,透明质酸联合微针可作为一种有效的短期种植体维护方式,帮助临床医生实现种植体周围软组织再生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e70f/12043223/2cc37b7b9604/JISP-28-643-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验