Irandoust Kamran, Daroudi Rajabali, Tajvar Maryam, Yaseri Mehdi
Department of Health Management, Policy, and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 17;13:1566469. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1566469. eCollection 2025.
The health status of a population is influenced by multiple determinants, including clinical care, health behaviors, the physical environment, and socioeconomic factors. This study examines the impact of these determinants on life expectancy (LE) and health-adjusted life expectancy (HALE) at both regional and global levels using econometric analysis.
This ecological study included all 194 WHO member countries from 2000 to 2018. The County Health Rankings Model was used to identify key health determinants. Thirty-six indicators were selected to measure these determinants, with data collected from the World Bank, World Health Observatory, Global Health Expenditure Database, Gapminder, United Nations Human Development Reports, and Global Burden of Disease Studies. LE and HALE were used as health status indicators, with data extracted from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 database. A multilevel mixed-effects linear regression model was applied for statistical analysis using Stata 16 software.
At the global level, the regression coefficients (β) with LE and HALE were 0.09 and 0.10 for education, -0.04 and -0.10 for injuries, 0.5 and 0.6 for urbanization, 0.10 and 0.8 for access to basic drinking water, -0.5 and -0.4 for drug use, 0.4 and 0.3 for obesity, and -0.15 and -0.16 for sexually transmitted infections, respectively. Sexually transmitted infections (β = -0.25) in the African region, access to basic drinking water (β = 0.30), alcohol consumption (β = -0.06), and drug use (β = -0.02) in the Americas, injuries (β = -0.16), air pollution (β = -0.10), and obesity (β = -0.24) in the Eastern Mediterranean, urbanization (β = 0.08) in Southeast Asia, and education (β = 0.36) and smoking (β = -0.06) in the Western Pacific had the greatest impact on HALE compared to other regions ( < 0.05).
To reduce inequalities, improve public health outcomes, and ensure efficient resource allocation, global and interregional policies should prioritize the determinants with the highest β values for health indicators in each region. These determinants are expected to yield greater marginal health benefits, making investments in them more cost-effective.
人群的健康状况受到多种决定因素的影响,包括临床护理、健康行为、物理环境和社会经济因素。本研究使用计量经济学分析,在区域和全球层面考察这些决定因素对预期寿命(LE)和健康调整生命年(HALE)的影响。
这项生态研究纳入了2000年至2018年期间所有194个世界卫生组织成员国。采用县健康排名模型来确定关键的健康决定因素。选择了36个指标来衡量这些决定因素,数据收集自世界银行、世界卫生观察站、全球卫生支出数据库、Gapminder、联合国人类发展报告和全球疾病负担研究。将LE和HALE用作健康状况指标,数据从《2019年全球疾病负担研究》数据库中提取。使用Stata 16软件应用多级混合效应线性回归模型进行统计分析。
在全球层面,教育对LE和HALE的回归系数(β)分别为0.09和0.10,伤害为 -0.04和 -0.10,城市化率为0.5和0.6,获得基本饮用水的机会为0.10和0.8,药物使用为 -0.5和 -0.4,肥胖为0.4和0.3,性传播感染为 -0.15和 -0.16。与其他区域相比,非洲区域的性传播感染(β = -0.25)、美洲的获得基本饮用水的机会(β = 0.30)、酒精消费(β = -0.06)和药物使用(β = -0.02)、东地中海区域的伤害(β = -0.16)、空气污染(β = -0.10)和肥胖(β = -0.24)、东南亚的城市化率(β = 0.08)以及西太平洋区域的教育(β = 0.36)和吸烟(β = -0.06)对HALE的影响最大( < 0.05)。
为了减少不平等、改善公共卫生结果并确保有效的资源分配,全球和区域间政策应优先考虑各区域健康指标中β值最高的决定因素。预计这些决定因素将产生更大的边际健康效益,对其进行投资更具成本效益。