• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

爱尔兰猪群中的抗菌药物使用情况:全国数据库分析(2019 - 2023年)

Antimicrobial use in pig herds in Ireland: analysis of a national database (2019-2023).

作者信息

Bolton Julie, O'Neill Lorcan, Garvan Caroline, Byrne Andrew W

机构信息

Antimicrobial Resistance Section, Veterinary Medicines, Antimicrobial Resistance, Animal By Products and Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies Division (VMAAT), Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM), Backweston, Kildare, W23 VW2C, Ireland.

Bacteriology and Parasitology Division, Central Veterinary Research Laboratory (CVRL), DAFM, Backweston Laboratory Campus, Celbridge, W23 VW2C, Ireland.

出版信息

Porcine Health Manag. 2025 May 2;11(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40813-025-00438-5.

DOI:10.1186/s40813-025-00438-5
PMID:40317066
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12048958/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in human and animal pathogens remains a global One-Health threat. The associations between antimicrobial use (AMU) and the evolution and dissemination of AMR bacteria, and their resistance genes, highlight the importance of monitoring and regulating AMU. Here, we present an analysis of national monitoring data of AMU in pig facilities in Ireland from 2019 to 2023 via the recently established National AMU Database. AMU was measured using two metrics (mg per corrected population units (mg/PCU) and defined daily dose (DDDvet/PCU)). Temporal trend models were fit using regression models with population average effects given there were multiple observations per herd, while controlling for herd type and size.

RESULTS

Linear spline models revealed no significant change in overall usage from Q1-2019 until mid-2020, followed by a significant decrease in usage until mid-2022. There was evidence of increases in usage from mid-2022 until the end of the time series; the exact timing of the changes in trends varied by the AMU metric. A multinomial logit regression model suggested that there was a significantly decreased probability of premix use relative to oral administration from Q3-2021 through Q4-2023 (OR: 0.70 - 0.58; P < 0.03). The predicted probability that a high priority critically important antimicrobial (HPCIA) was used in a herd during a year-quarter declined by an average of 9% per quarter (OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.90-0.92; p < 0.001) over the study period. The mean decline in use of cephalosporin (3rd /4th generation), fluoroquinolone and macrolide (a former HPCIA) per quarter were estimated to be -12% (95% CI: -8- -15%), -9% (95% CI: -8- -10%) and - 4% (95% CI: -2- -4%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This exploration of AMU in pigs in Ireland revealed significant changes in overall usage, with both decreases and increases. There were declines in usage of HPCIA agents. Additionally, there was evidence of a significant decline in the use of oral premixes, coinciding with policy change. Further monitoring of AMU is essential to understand how the pig farming sector is responding to policy changes (e.g., increasing AMU in response to zinc oxide bans).

摘要

背景

人类和动物病原体中的抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)仍然是全球“同一健康”面临的威胁。抗菌药物使用(AMU)与AMR细菌及其耐药基因的演变和传播之间的关联,凸显了监测和规范AMU的重要性。在此,我们通过最近建立的国家AMU数据库,对2019年至2023年爱尔兰养猪场的AMU国家监测数据进行了分析。AMU使用两个指标进行衡量(每校正种群单位毫克数(mg/PCU)和规定日剂量(DDDvet/PCU))。由于每个猪群有多个观测值,因此使用具有总体平均效应的回归模型拟合时间趋势模型,同时控制猪群类型和规模。

结果

线性样条模型显示,从2019年第一季度到2020年年中,总体使用量没有显著变化,随后到2022年年中使用量显著下降。有证据表明,从2022年年中到时间序列结束,使用量有所增加;趋势变化的确切时间因AMU指标而异。多项logit回归模型表明,从2021年第三季度到2023年第四季度,相对于口服给药,预混剂使用的概率显著降低(比值比:0.70 - 0.58;P < 0.03)。在研究期间,一年季度内猪群使用高优先级 critically important antimicrobial(HPCIA)的预测概率平均每季度下降9%(比值比:0.91;95%置信区间:0.90 - 0.92;p < 0.001)。头孢菌素(第三代/第四代)、氟喹诺酮和大环内酯(一种以前的HPCIA)每季度使用量的平均下降估计分别为-12%(95%置信区间:-8 - -15%)、-9%(95%置信区间:-8 - -10%)和-4%(95%置信区间:-2 - -4%)。

结论

对爱尔兰猪群AMU的这一探索揭示了总体使用量的显著变化,有降有升。HPCIA药物的使用量有所下降。此外,有证据表明口服预混剂的使用量显著下降,这与政策变化相吻合。进一步监测AMU对于了解养猪业如何应对政策变化(例如,因氧化锌禁令而增加AMU)至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd5c/12048958/f2235efaa73e/40813_2025_438_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd5c/12048958/4cd77e25d16c/40813_2025_438_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd5c/12048958/07dfa8abafcf/40813_2025_438_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd5c/12048958/5740dcccd74a/40813_2025_438_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd5c/12048958/f2235efaa73e/40813_2025_438_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd5c/12048958/4cd77e25d16c/40813_2025_438_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd5c/12048958/07dfa8abafcf/40813_2025_438_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd5c/12048958/5740dcccd74a/40813_2025_438_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd5c/12048958/f2235efaa73e/40813_2025_438_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Antimicrobial use in pig herds in Ireland: analysis of a national database (2019-2023).爱尔兰猪群中的抗菌药物使用情况:全国数据库分析(2019 - 2023年)
Porcine Health Manag. 2025 May 2;11(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40813-025-00438-5.
2
Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and associations with aggregated antimicrobial usage in Ireland: A herd-level exploration.从爱尔兰猪群中分离出的大肠杆菌的抗药性及其与集中使用抗菌药物的关联性:群体水平的探索。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2024 Feb;71(1):71-83. doi: 10.1111/zph.13086. Epub 2023 Oct 29.
3
Quantification of antimicrobial use on Irish dairy farms: A comparison of three recording methods.爱尔兰奶牛场抗菌药物使用量的量化:三种记录方法的比较。
J Dairy Sci. 2025 Feb;108(2):1790-1806. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-24688. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
4
Estimating antimicrobial usage based on sales to beef and dairy farms from UK veterinary practices.基于英国兽医诊所向肉牛和奶牛养殖场销售的数据来估算抗菌药物使用量。
Vet Rec. 2021 Jul;189(1):e28. doi: 10.1002/vetr.28. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
5
Antimicrobial Use and Susceptibility of Indicator in Finnish Integrated Pork Production.芬兰综合猪肉生产中指示菌的抗菌药物使用与敏感性
Front Microbiol. 2021 Nov 4;12:754894. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.754894. eCollection 2021.
6
Comparison of different antimicrobial use indicators and antimicrobial resistance data in food-producing animals.食品生产动物中不同抗菌药物使用指标与抗菌药物耐药性数据的比较。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2021 Nov 5;3(4):dlab172. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlab172. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
A register-based study on associations between vaccination, antimicrobial use and productivity in conventional Danish finisher pig herds during 2011 to 2014.一项基于登记数据的研究,探讨2011年至2014年丹麦传统育肥猪群中疫苗接种、抗菌药物使用与生产性能之间的关联。
Prev Vet Med. 2019 Mar 1;164:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
8
Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance Indicators-Integration of Farm-Level Surveillance Data From Broiler Chickens and Turkeys in British Columbia, Canada.抗菌药物使用与抗菌药物耐药性指标——整合加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省肉鸡和火鸡养殖场层面的监测数据
Front Vet Sci. 2019 May 3;6:131. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00131. eCollection 2019.
9
Quantification of antimicrobial usage in adult cows and preweaned calves on 40 large Wisconsin dairy farms using dose-based and mass-based metrics.使用基于剂量和基于质量的指标对威斯康星州 40 家大型奶牛场的成年奶牛和断奶前小牛的抗菌药物使用情况进行定量评估。
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Apr;104(4):4727-4745. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19315. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
10
Predicting effects of changed antimicrobial usage on the abundance of antimicrobial resistance genes in finisher' gut microbiomes.预测抗菌药物使用变化对育肥猪肠道微生物群中抗菌药物耐药基因丰度的影响。
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Jan;174:104853. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104853. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Antimicrobial Usage on Swiss Pig Farms from 2018 to 2021: Based on an Electronic Treatment Journal.2018年至2021年瑞士养猪场抗菌药物使用趋势:基于电子治疗日志
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Sep 2;13(9):831. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13090831.
2
Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and associations with aggregated antimicrobial usage in Ireland: A herd-level exploration.从爱尔兰猪群中分离出的大肠杆菌的抗药性及其与集中使用抗菌药物的关联性:群体水平的探索。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2024 Feb;71(1):71-83. doi: 10.1111/zph.13086. Epub 2023 Oct 29.
3
The new Veterinary Medicines Regulation: rising to the challenge.
新的兽药法规:应对挑战
Ir Vet J. 2022 Feb 3;75(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13620-022-00209-6.
4
Risk Factors for Antimicrobial Use on Irish Pig Farms.爱尔兰养猪场使用抗菌药物的风险因素。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Sep 28;11(10):2828. doi: 10.3390/ani11102828.
5
Global Trends in Antimicrobial Use in Food Animals from 2017 to 2030.2017年至2030年食用动物抗菌药物使用的全球趋势
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Dec 17;9(12):918. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9120918.
6
Does the Use of Different Indicators to Benchmark Antimicrobial Use Affect Farm Ranking?使用不同指标对标抗菌药物使用情况会影响养殖场排名吗?
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Oct 13;7:558793. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.558793. eCollection 2020.
7
Quantification, description and international comparison of antimicrobial use on Irish pig farms.爱尔兰养猪场抗菌药物使用情况的量化、描述及国际比较。
Porcine Health Manag. 2020 Oct 12;6:30. doi: 10.1186/s40813-020-00166-y. eCollection 2020.
8
Patterns of antibiotic use in global pig production: A systematic review.全球生猪生产中抗生素使用模式:一项系统综述。
Vet Anim Sci. 2019 Apr 6;7:100058. doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2019.100058. eCollection 2019 Jun.
9
Close to a Decade of Decrease in Antimicrobial Usage in Danish Pig Production-Evaluating the Effect of the Yellow Card Scheme.丹麦生猪生产中抗菌药物使用量近十年呈下降趋势——评估黄牌计划的效果
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Mar 6;7:109. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00109. eCollection 2020.
10
Antibiotic use in chicken farms in northwestern China.中国西北部养鸡场的抗生素使用情况。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Jan 7;9(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0672-6. eCollection 2020.