Suppr超能文献

爱尔兰养猪场抗菌药物使用情况的量化、描述及国际比较。

Quantification, description and international comparison of antimicrobial use on Irish pig farms.

作者信息

O'Neill Lorcan, Rodrigues da Costa Maria, Leonard Finola C, Gibbons James, Calderón Díaz Julia Adriana, McCutcheon Gerard, Manzanilla Edgar García

机构信息

Pig Development Department, Teagasc, The Irish Food and Agriculture Authority, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co Cork Ireland.

School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.

出版信息

Porcine Health Manag. 2020 Oct 12;6:30. doi: 10.1186/s40813-020-00166-y. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is concern that the use of antimicrobials in livestock production has a role in the emergence and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance in animals and humans. Consequently, there are increasing efforts to reduce antimicrobial use (AMU) in agriculture. As the largest consumer of veterinary antimicrobials in several countries, the pig sector is a particular focus of these efforts. Data on AMU in pig production in Ireland are lacking. This study aimed to quantify AMU on Irish pig farms, to identify the major patterns of use employed and to compare the results obtained to those from other published reports and studies.

RESULTS

Antimicrobial use data for 2016 was collected from 67 Irish pig farms which represented c. 35% of national production. The combined sample population consumed 14.5 t of antimicrobial by weight of active ingredient suggesting that the pig sector accounted for approximately 40% of veterinary AMU in Ireland in 2016. At farm level, median AMU measured in milligram per population correction unit (mg/PCU) was 93.9 (range: 1.0-1196.0). When measured in terms of treatment incidence (TI200), median AMU was 15.4 (range: 0.2-169.2). Oral treatments accounted for 97.5% of all AMU by weight of active ingredient and were primarily administered via medicated feed to pigs in the post weaning stages of production. AMU in Irish pig production in 2016 was higher than results obtained from the national reports of Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands and France but lower than the United Kingdom.

CONCLUSIONS

Pig production in Ireland is an important consumer of veterinary antimicrobials. The quantities and patterns of AMU on Irish pig farms are comparable to pig production in other European countries but higher than some countries with more advanced AMU reduction strategies. This AMU is characterised by a high proportion of prophylactic use and is primarily administered to pigs post weaning via medicated feed. Further studies to better understand the reasons for AMU on Irish pig farms and strategies to improve health among weaner pigs will be of benefit in the effort to reduce AMU.

摘要

背景

人们担心在畜牧生产中使用抗菌药物会在动物和人类中导致抗菌药物耐药性的出现和传播。因此,减少农业中抗菌药物使用(AMU)的努力日益增加。作为几个国家中兽用抗菌药物的最大消费领域,养猪业是这些努力的特别关注对象。爱尔兰缺乏关于养猪生产中抗菌药物使用的数据。本研究旨在量化爱尔兰猪场的抗菌药物使用情况,确定主要的使用模式,并将所得结果与其他已发表的报告和研究结果进行比较。

结果

从67个爱尔兰猪场收集了2016年的抗菌药物使用数据,这些猪场约占全国产量的35%。按活性成分重量计算,样本总体共消耗了14.5吨抗菌药物,这表明养猪业在2016年约占爱尔兰兽用抗菌药物使用量的40%。在农场层面,以每群体校正单位毫克(mg/PCU)衡量的抗菌药物使用中位数为93.9(范围:1.0 - 1196.0)。以治疗发生率(TI200)衡量时,抗菌药物使用中位数为15.4(范围:0.2 - 169.2)。按活性成分重量计算,口服治疗占所有抗菌药物使用量的97.5%,主要是通过在生产断奶后阶段给猪投喂加药饲料进行给药。2016年爱尔兰养猪生产中的抗菌药物使用量高于瑞典、丹麦、荷兰和法国的国家报告结果,但低于英国。

结论

爱尔兰的养猪生产是兽用抗菌药物的重要消费领域。爱尔兰猪场抗菌药物使用的数量和模式与其他欧洲国家的养猪生产情况相当,但高于一些拥有更先进抗菌药物使用减少策略的国家。这种抗菌药物使用的特点是预防性使用比例高,主要是在断奶后通过给猪投喂加药饲料进行给药。进一步开展研究以更好地了解爱尔兰猪场抗菌药物使用的原因以及改善断奶仔猪健康的策略,将有助于减少抗菌药物的使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a34/7549222/96c76c722ea5/40813_2020_166_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验