• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

世界卫生组织一项评估癌症患者生活经历的国际调查的开展:预试验、用户反馈及调查修订的结果

Development of a World Health Organization international survey assessing the lived experience of people affected by cancer: outcomes from pilot testing, user feedback, and survey revision.

作者信息

Schilstra Clarissa E, Wakefield Claire E, McLoone Jordana, Wiener Lori, Donoghoe Mark W, Hoffman Ruth I, Echodu Moses, Ortiz Roberta, Ilbawi André, Cayrol Julie

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Randwick, NSW, Australia.

Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Level 1 South, Sydney Children'S Hospital, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2025 May 3;33(5):445. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09372-2.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-025-09372-2
PMID:40317296
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12049296/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Assessing differences between lived experiences of people affected by cancer internationally facilitates direction of international health policies and standards. The study piloted, on behalf of the World Health Organization (WHO), a global survey assessing the lived experience of people affected by cancer. We aimed to determine (1) the acceptability of the survey and (2) the survey's capacity to capture a globally representative sample of people diagnosed with cancer.

METHODS

The cross-sectional survey went through two pilot rounds. We (1) solicited feedback from international cancer organisations through a feedback form, and (2) launched a global online survey, requesting open-ended feedback on the survey format/content from people diagnosed with cancer, their family members/caregivers, and bereaved family members.

RESULTS

Round one: 23 stakeholders found the survey acceptable in length/content. Minor suggestions were to improve readability/applicability across healthcare settings. Round two: 505 individuals participated: 177 (35%) provided feedback on the study design (e.g. to include people currently being treated for cancer, and siblings) or survey (e.g. assessing impacts of multiple cancers). Participants seemed to value the opportunity to share their experiences: "Thanks…felt good to answer as if someone was listening." Compared with global statistics, our sample of people diagnosed with cancer (N = 240) included significantly more females (p < 0.001) and individuals from high-income countries (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Participant feedback informed important changes to the survey design and content. Our findings highlight that engaging with people with lived experience is a critical first step to develop such a global survey, optimise participation, and amplify individuals' voices.

摘要

目的

评估全球范围内癌症患者的生活经历差异,有助于指导国际卫生政策和标准的制定。本研究代表世界卫生组织(WHO)开展了一项全球调查,以评估癌症患者的生活经历。我们旨在确定:(1)该调查的可接受性;(2)该调查获取全球具有代表性的癌症确诊患者样本的能力。

方法

这项横断面调查进行了两轮试点。我们:(1)通过反馈表征求国际癌症组织的反馈意见;(2)开展了一项全球在线调查,向癌症确诊患者、其家庭成员/护理人员以及失去亲人的家庭成员征求对调查形式/内容的开放式反馈意见。

结果

第一轮:23名利益相关者认为该调查在长度/内容方面是可接受的。一些小建议是提高在不同医疗环境下的可读性/适用性。第二轮:505人参与:177人(35%)就研究设计(如纳入目前正在接受癌症治疗的患者和兄弟姐妹)或调查(如评估多种癌症的影响)提供了反馈意见。参与者似乎很重视分享他们经历的机会:“谢谢……回答问题感觉很好,就好像有人在倾听一样。”与全球统计数据相比,我们的癌症确诊患者样本(N = 240)中女性(p < 0.001)和来自高收入国家的个体(p < 0.001)明显更多。

结论

参与者的反馈为调查设计和内容的重要改进提供了依据。我们的研究结果表明,与有实际生活经历的人合作是开展此类全球调查、优化参与度并放大个人声音的关键第一步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3811/12049296/3abaff0babf3/520_2025_9372_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3811/12049296/3abaff0babf3/520_2025_9372_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3811/12049296/3abaff0babf3/520_2025_9372_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a World Health Organization international survey assessing the lived experience of people affected by cancer: outcomes from pilot testing, user feedback, and survey revision.世界卫生组织一项评估癌症患者生活经历的国际调查的开展:预试验、用户反馈及调查修订的结果
Support Care Cancer. 2025 May 3;33(5):445. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09372-2.
2
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
3
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
6
Home telemonitoring and remote feedback between clinic visits for asthma.哮喘患者门诊就诊期间的家庭远程监测与远程反馈
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 3;2016(8):CD011714. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011714.pub2.
7
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
8
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
9
Interventions for preventing abuse in the elderly.预防老年人受虐待的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 16;2016(8):CD010321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010321.pub2.
10
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.

本文引用的文献

1
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.2022 年全球癌症统计数据:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率全球估计数。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
2
The lived experience of people affected by cancer: A global cross-sectional survey protocol.癌症患者的生活体验:全球横断面调查方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0294492. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294492. eCollection 2024.
3
Healthcare professionals' perspectives on the unmet needs of cancer patients and family caregivers: global psycho-oncology investigation.
医疗专业人员对癌症患者和家属照顾者未满足需求的看法:全球心理肿瘤学调查。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Dec 15;31(1):36. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07478-5.
4
Factors influencing cancer patients' experiences of care in the USA, United Kingdom, and Canada: A systematic review.影响美国、英国和加拿大癌症患者护理体验的因素:一项系统综述。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Apr 21;47:101405. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101405. eCollection 2022 May.
5
Priorities for cancer research in low- and middle-income countries: a global perspective.中低收入国家癌症研究重点:全球视角。
Nat Med. 2022 Apr;28(4):649-657. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01738-x. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
6
Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects.消费者参与医疗政策、研究和服务:方法和效果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):e0261808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261808. eCollection 2022.
7
"We Have All This Knowledge to Give, So Use Us as a Resource": Partnering with Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors to Determine Consumer-Led Research Priorities.“我们拥有所有这些知识可以提供,所以将我们当作一种资源来利用”:与青少年和青年癌症幸存者合作以确定由消费者主导的研究重点。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2022 Apr;11(2):211-222. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2021.0052. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
8
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
9
Redefining global health priorities: Improving cancer care in developing settings.重新定义全球卫生重点:改善发展中地区的癌症护理。
J Glob Health. 2014 Jun;4(1):010304. doi: 10.7189/jogh.04.010304.