Heitzmann Wolfram, Enzmann Julia, von Kohout Maria, Mattern Maximilian Maria, Akkan Jan, Fuchs Paul Christian, Schiefer Jennifer Lynn
Clinic of Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand and Burn Surgery, Hospital Cologne Merheim, University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany.
Clinic of Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand and Burn Surgery, Hospital Cologne Merheim, University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany.
Burns. 2025 Jun;51(5):107471. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2025.107471. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
Recent studies have shown that long-term scarring from burns is significantly reduced through the use of enzymatic debridement. Following enzymatic debridement of deep dermal burns, numerous wound dressings are available that provide an adequate wound environment and ideal conditions for rapid wound healing. In German burn centres, Suprathel® has mostly been used for this purpose. Since 2019, the alternative Kerecis Omega3 Wound®, which is derived from fish skin, has been used as an alternative in burn medicine. Therefore, we conducted a single-centre prospective, open, comparative, and intra-individual clinical study to gain initial experience in the use of Kerecis Omega3 Wound®, establish a treatment algorithm and compare Suprathel® and Kerecis Omega3 Wound® in the treatment of deep dermal burns after enzymatic debridement with respect to wound healing, exudation and pain. After enzymatic debridement of deep dermal burns of the hand and foot, wounds were divided into two areas: one was treated with Suprathel® and the other with Kerecis Omega3 Wound®. Dressing changes and wound checks were carried out on days 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 48, after application. With this, initial experience concerning the handling of Kerecis Omega3 Wound® was gained and wound healing, infection, exudation, and pain were documented. In the period from January 1, 2022, to October 1, 2023, 22 patients between the ages of 18 and 83 years with deep dermal burns were treated. Satisfactory results were obtained in all cases; no patients had to undergo a second debridement followed by skin grafting. Mean healing time after the use of Kerecis Omega3 Wound was 17 days (min 8 days, max 25 days) whereas it was 23 days (min 12 days, max 42 days) in the Suprathel-Areas. No infections were observed in both groups. Exudation throughout the wound healing process was significantly higher in the Kerecis Omega3 Wound group than in the Suprathel group, whereas no significant differences in pain levels were documented. The management of dressing changes, the assessment of the progress of wound healing and adjusting the level of moisture in the dressings were obstacles, which could only be overcome by appropriate experience of the burn surgeon. In particular, adjusting the degree of moisture had a major influence on the progress of wound healing. Depending on these parameters, very different healing processes of the fish skin, from early dissolution into the so-called "active slough", to the drying out of the wound dressing to form a crust and remaining there for several weeks. In all 22 patients, however, the treatment led to spontaneous wound healing and satisfactory results without the need of skin grafting or other surgical procedures. Kerecis Omega3 Wound® is safe to use and suitable for the treatment of deep dermal burn wounds following enzymatic debridement. Its application leads to accelerated wound healing compared to the use of Suprathel®, however, owing to the different courses of the external appearance of the wound during wound healing, a high degree of user experience is necessary. Kerecis Omega3 Wound® might be useful to improve scarring after enzymatically debrided deep dermal burn wounds. Thus, a comparison between Kerecis Omega3 Wound® and Suprathel® concerning their long-term results is still pending.
最近的研究表明,通过酶促清创术可显著减少烧伤后的长期瘢痕形成。在对深度真皮烧伤进行酶促清创术后,有多种伤口敷料可供选择,这些敷料能为伤口愈合提供适宜的环境和理想条件。在德国烧伤中心,Suprathel®大多用于此目的。自2019年以来,源自鱼皮的替代产品Kerecis Omega3 Wound®已被用作烧伤医学中的替代品。因此,我们开展了一项单中心前瞻性、开放性、对比性和个体内临床研究,以获取使用Kerecis Omega3 Wound®的初步经验,建立治疗方案,并比较Suprathel®和Kerecis Omega3 Wound®在酶促清创术后治疗深度真皮烧伤时在伤口愈合、渗出和疼痛方面的效果。对手部和足部的深度真皮烧伤进行酶促清创术后,将伤口分为两个区域:一个区域用Suprathel®治疗,另一个区域用Kerecis Omega3 Wound®治疗。在应用后第2、4、8、12、16、24和48天进行换药和伤口检查。由此,获得了关于处理Kerecis Omega3 Wound®的初步经验,并记录了伤口愈合、感染、渗出和疼痛情况。在2022年1月1日至2023年10月1日期间,对22例年龄在18至83岁之间的深度真皮烧伤患者进行了治疗。所有病例均取得了满意的结果;没有患者需要再次进行清创并随后进行植皮手术。使用Kerecis Omega3 Wound®后的平均愈合时间为17天(最短8天,最长25天),而在使用Suprathel®的区域平均愈合时间为23天(最短12天,最长42天)。两组均未观察到感染情况。在整个伤口愈合过程中,Kerecis Omega3 Wound®组的渗出明显高于Suprathel®组,而在疼痛程度方面未记录到显著差异。换药的处理、伤口愈合进展的评估以及调整敷料中的湿度水平是一些障碍,只有烧伤外科医生具备适当经验才能克服。特别是,调整湿度程度对伤口愈合进展有重大影响。根据这些参数,鱼皮的愈合过程差异很大,从早期溶解成所谓的“活性腐肉”,到伤口敷料干燥形成痂皮并在那里停留数周。然而,在所有22例患者中,该治疗均导致伤口自发愈合且结果令人满意,无需植皮或其他外科手术。Kerecis Omega3 Wound®使用安全,适用于酶促清创术后深度真皮烧伤伤口的治疗。与使用Suprathel®相比,其应用可加速伤口愈合,然而,由于伤口愈合过程中外观变化的不同过程,需要高度的用户经验。Kerecis Omega3 Wound®可能有助于改善酶促清创术后深度真皮烧伤伤口的瘢痕形成。因此,Kerecis Omega3 Wound®和Suprathel®在长期效果方面的比较仍有待进行。