Teketelew Bisrat Birke, Berta Dereje Mengesha, Chane Elias, Mekuanint Amare, Alemayehu Tekletsadik Tekleslassie, Mulatie Zewudu, Walle Muluken, Angelo Abiy Ayele, Cherie Negesse
Department of Hematology and Immunohematology, University of Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Department of clinical chemistry, University of Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gondar, Ethiopia.
PLoS One. 2025 May 5;20(5):e0322382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322382. eCollection 2025.
Thyroid neoplasms include a range of lesions, most of which are benign, though some may progress to or present as malignant. Diagnostic tools like FNAB, ultrasound, and hormone analysis are commonly used, though they have limitations. Recently, peripheral blood markers have been explored for their potential in differentiating thyroid lesions, despite controversy evidence. This review evaluates the diagnostic utility of NLR and PLR in thyroid lesions.
We systematically searched all relevant articles on PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, and gray literature, including Google Scholar, for studies on the diagnostic utility of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in thyroid lesions. Two researchers independently screened articles, and study quality was assessed using the QUADAS 2 tool. A random-effects model calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity, while the area under the HSROC curve summarized diagnostic accuracy. Heterogeneity was evaluated with Higgins' I² statistic, and publication bias was assessed using the MIDAS command. Subgroup analyses by sample size, gender distribution, cutoff values, and carcinoma types explored sources of heterogeneity.
A total of 12 studies were included in the final meta-analysis, with 9 focusing on NLR and 6 on PLR. Most of these studies were retrospective in design. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of NLR were 75% (95% CI: 65-82%) and 62% (95% CI: 42-75%), respectively. For PLR, the overall sensitivity and specificity were 70% (95% CI: 61-78%) and 57% (95% CI: 46-66%), respectively. The diagnostic accuracy, based on the area under the HSROC curve (AUC), was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71-0.79) for NLR and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.65-0.73) for PLR. These results indicate that NLR has better diagnostic accuracy than PLR in distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid lesions.
While the NLR demonstrates better diagnostic utility than the PLR in distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid lesions, its standalone diagnostic accuracy remains moderate. Therefore, we recommend using these markers as complementary tools alongside other standard diagnostic modalities until further studies provide more definitive evidence. Thyroid neoplasm is a type of cancer which arises from the thyroid parenchymal cell and affects the thyroid gland. The disease encompasses a variety of lesion, including benign adenomas to malignant carcinomas [1]. The majority of thyroid glands are noncancerous and are mostly benign. In some contexts, thyroid adenomas may transform into carcinomas as the nonfunctional adenomas possess oncogene mutations [2]. Overall, 5% of thyroid nodules are malignant. Notably, approximately 20% of follicular adenomas have the potential to progress into follicular carcinomas [3]. The common thyroid malignancies include, papillary, follicular, medullary and anaplastic types, which varies based on the aggressiveness of the cancer, which are highly variable clinical features; some may be indolent and slow progressing while others may be highly aggressive tumors with a high mortality rate [4,5]. Globally, thyroid cancer cases are increasing over time. Approximately 18.3 million thyroid cases were reported with a high prevalence rate in China and United States [6]. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was used and performed for this systematic review and meta-analysis. This review was registered on PROSPERO with registration number of CRD42024559798.
甲状腺肿瘤包括一系列病变,其中大多数是良性的,不过有些可能进展为恶性或表现为恶性。细针穿刺抽吸活检(FNAB)、超声和激素分析等诊断工具常用,但存在局限性。尽管证据存在争议,但最近已对外周血标志物在鉴别甲状腺病变方面的潜力进行了探索。本综述评估中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)在甲状腺病变中的诊断效用。
我们系统检索了PubMed、Science Direct、Cochrane图书馆以及灰色文献(包括谷歌学术)上所有关于血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)在甲状腺病变中诊断效用的相关文章。两名研究人员独立筛选文章,并使用QUADAS-2工具评估研究质量。采用随机效应模型计算合并敏感度和特异度,同时用HSROC曲线下面积总结诊断准确性。用希金斯I²统计量评估异质性,并用MIDAS命令评估发表偏倚。按样本量、性别分布、截断值和癌类型进行亚组分析,以探索异质性来源。
最终的荟萃分析共纳入12项研究,其中9项聚焦于NLR,6项聚焦于PLR。这些研究大多为回顾性设计。NLR的合并敏感度和特异度分别为75%(95%CI:65 - 82%)和62%(95%CI:42 - 75%)。对于PLR,总体敏感度和特异度分别为70%(95%CI:61 - 78%)和57%(95%CI:46 - 66%)。基于HSROC曲线下面积(AUC)的诊断准确性,NLR为0.75(95%CI:0.71 - 0.79),PLR为0.69(95%CI:0.65 - 0.73)。这些结果表明,在区分良性和恶性甲状腺病变方面,NLR的诊断准确性优于PLR。
虽然在区分良性和恶性甲状腺病变方面,NLR的诊断效用优于PLR,但其独立诊断准确性仍属中等。因此,在进一步研究提供更确凿证据之前,我们建议将这些标志物作为辅助工具与其他标准诊断方法一起使用。甲状腺肿瘤是一种起源于甲状腺实质细胞并累及甲状腺的癌症。该疾病包括多种病变,从良性腺瘤到恶性癌[1]。大多数甲状腺是非癌性的,大多为良性。在某些情况下,甲状腺腺瘤可能会转变为癌,因为无功能腺瘤具有致癌基因突变[2]。总体而言,5%的甲状腺结节是恶性的。值得注意的是,约20%的滤泡性腺瘤有可能进展为滤泡性癌[3]。常见的甲状腺恶性肿瘤包括乳头状、滤泡状、髓样和未分化型,其因癌症的侵袭性而异,临床特征差异很大;有些可能进展缓慢且不活跃,而有些可能是侵袭性很强、死亡率很高的肿瘤[4,5]。全球范围内,甲状腺癌病例随时间推移在增加。中国和美国报告的甲状腺病例约有1830万,患病率很高[6]。本系统评价和荟萃分析采用了系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。本综述已在PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD42024559798。