Kelly Michelle, Kelly Michelle, Mierendorff Simon, Mierendorff Simon, Wales Kylie, Wales Kylie, Voeste Johanna, Voeste Johanna, Allen Joanne, Allen Joanne, McDonald Skye, McDonald Skye
School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Brain Impair. 2025 May;26. doi: 10.1071/IB24114.
Background Mild cognitive impairment affects over 15% of adults aged 50+ years and is a primary risk indicator for dementia. Although access to assessment is crucial, many older adults face barriers to in-person evaluation. Methods This study used a randomised cross-over design to assess the practicality, acceptability, and adaptation of a telehealth-based screening battery tailored for older adults. Forty-three volunteers aged 50+ years (m =70.3, s.d.=10.8) completed in-person or videoconference assessments, including the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), Brief Assessment of Social Skills (BASS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and Assessment of Living Skills And Resources-2 (ALSAR-R2). The alternate format was administered after 3weeks. Practicality was assessed with reference to task modifications, completion, and administration time. Acceptability was evaluated via questionnaire. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results Minimal modifications were needed for the videoconference format, and it was highly acceptable to respondents. Reliability across formats was excellent for BASS Empathy, HADS Depression, MBI and ALSAR-R2 (ICC=1.00-0.92) and good for ACE-III, HADS Anxiety, and BASS Face Emotion Perception, Face Identification, and Social Disinhibition scales (ICC=0.77-0.89). Conclusions Findings support the feasibility of telehealth-based administration of the screening battery; however, biases in emotion perception performance between modalities require further research.
轻度认知障碍影响着超过15%的50岁及以上成年人,是痴呆症的主要风险指标。尽管进行评估至关重要,但许多老年人在接受面对面评估时面临障碍。方法:本研究采用随机交叉设计,以评估一种为老年人量身定制的基于远程医疗的筛查组合的实用性、可接受性和适应性。43名年龄在50岁及以上的志愿者(平均年龄=70.3岁,标准差=10.8岁)完成了面对面或视频会议评估,包括Addenbrooke认知检查-III(ACE-III)、社交技能简要评估(BASS)、医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)、改良Barthel指数(MBI)以及生活技能和资源评估-2(ALSAR-R2)。3周后采用另一种形式进行评估。参照任务修改、完成情况和管理时间来评估实用性。通过问卷调查评估可接受性。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估信度。结果:视频会议形式所需的修改极少,且受访者高度认可。BASS共情、HADS抑郁、MBI和ALSAR-R2在不同形式下的信度极佳(ICC=1.00 - 0.92),ACE-III、HADS焦虑以及BASS面部情绪感知、面部识别和社交抑制量表的信度良好(ICC=0.77 - 0.89)。结论:研究结果支持基于远程医疗进行筛查组合管理的可行性;然而,不同方式之间在情绪感知表现上的偏差需要进一步研究。