Norman-Nott Nell, Briggs Nancy E, Hesam-Shariati Negin, Wilks Chelsey R, Schroeder Jessica, Diwan Ashish D, Suh Jina, Newby Jill M, Newton-John Toby, Quidé Yann, McAuley James H, Gustin Sylvia M
NeuroRecovery Research Hub, School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e256908. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.6908.
Current therapeutic approaches are inaccessible to many people with chronic pain and frequently fail to address emotion dysregulation as a key factor in psychological comorbidity and pain intensity. An effective and accessible emotion regulation-focused intervention is needed.
To compare the efficacy of online dialectical behavioral therapy for chronic pain plus treatment as usual (iDBT-Pain) with only treatment as usual on emotion dysregulation in people with chronic pain.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This 2-arm randomized clinical trial was conducted from March 2023 to September 2024 in Australia. Participants were adults with chronic pain (lasting ≥3 months) and weekly pain intensity of 3 or higher out of 10 (10 indicating worst pain), without psychotic or personality disorders, and without dementia. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either iDBT-Pain for 9 weeks or treatment as usual only. Intention-to-treat data analyses were performed between August and September 2024.
The iDBT-Pain group received 8 group-based 90-minute therapist-guided online sessions as well as an app and a handbook for self-learning. Content focused on DBT skills training, including pain science education. Participants in the treatment-as-usual group continued usual care, which consisted of treatment options that can be accessed in the community.
The primary outcome was emotion dysregulation at 9 weeks after randomization. The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (score range: 18-90, with higher scores indicating higher emotion dysregulation) was used in assessment.
Among 89 participants (mean [SD] age, 51.5 [14.2] years; 74 females [83%]), 44 (49%) were randomly assigned to the treatment-as-usual group and 45 (51%) were randomly assigned to the iDBT-Pain group. Overall, 79 participants (89%) completed the 9-week assessment. Between-group difference in emotion dysregulation over time favored iDBT-Pain over treatment as usual at 9 weeks (-4.88; 95% CI, -9.20 to -0.55; P = .03; Cohen d = -0.46 [95% CI, -0.87 to -0.08]).
In this randomized clinical trial, the iDBT-Pain intervention, delivered through a self-learning and therapist-guided hybrid approach, resulted in sustained improvements in emotion dysregulation in people with chronic pain.
Anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12622000113752.
目前的治疗方法许多慢性疼痛患者无法获得,并且常常未能将情绪失调作为心理共病和疼痛强度的关键因素加以解决。因此需要一种有效且可及的以情绪调节为重点的干预措施。
比较在线辩证行为疗法结合常规治疗(iDBT-Pain)与仅采用常规治疗对慢性疼痛患者情绪失调的疗效。
设计、地点和参与者:这项双臂随机临床试验于2023年3月至2024年9月在澳大利亚进行。参与者为患有慢性疼痛(持续时间≥3个月)且每周疼痛强度在10分制中为3分或更高(10分表示最严重疼痛)的成年人,无精神障碍或人格障碍,也无痴呆。符合条件的参与者被随机分配(1:1比例)接受为期9周的iDBT-Pain治疗或仅接受常规治疗。意向性分析于2024年8月至9月进行。
iDBT-Pain组接受8次由治疗师指导的90分钟在线小组课程,以及一款应用程序和一本自学手册。内容侧重于辩证行为疗法技能培训,包括疼痛科学教育。常规治疗组的参与者继续接受常规护理,包括社区可获得的治疗选择。
主要结局是随机分组后9周时的情绪失调情况。使用情绪调节困难量表(评分范围:18 - 90,分数越高表明情绪失调越严重)进行评估。
在89名参与者中(平均[标准差]年龄,51.5[14.2]岁;74名女性[83%]),44名(49%)被随机分配到常规治疗组,45名(51%)被随机分配到iDBT-Pain组。总体而言,79名参与者(89%)完成了9周的评估。9周时,iDBT-Pain组在情绪失调方面随时间的组间差异优于常规治疗组(-4.88;95%置信区间,-9.20至-0.55;P = 0.03;科恩d = -0.46[95%置信区间,-0.87至-0.08])。
在这项随机临床试验中,通过自学和治疗师指导相结合的方法实施的iDBT-Pain干预措施,使慢性疼痛患者的情绪失调得到持续改善。
Anzctr.org.au标识符:ACTRN12622000113752。