• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

未访问为家庭提供免费遗传咨询服务的研究网站的癌症幸存者的信任和隐私担忧:调查研究

Trust and Privacy Concerns Among Cancer Survivors Who Did Not Visit a Research Website Offering Free Genetic Counseling Services for Families: Survey Study.

作者信息

Shepperd James A, McBride Colleen M, An Weihua, Zhao Jingsong, Pentz Rebecca D, Escoffery Cam, Ward Kevin, Guan Yue

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 6;27:e64228. doi: 10.2196/64228.

DOI:10.2196/64228
PMID:40327861
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12093066/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital health tools, such as websites, now proliferate to assist individuals in managing their health. With user input, we developed the Your Family Connects (YFC) website to promote access to genetic services for survivors of ovarian cancer and their relatives. Although we estimated that half or more would access the website, only 18% of invited survivors did so. We assessed the extent to which perceived relevance of the information provided, trust, and privacy concerns influenced decisions not to access the website.

OBJECTIVE

We designed a theory-based cross-sectional survey to explore the following questions: (1) To what extent did nonresponders endorse privacy concerns? (2) Were privacy concerns associated with recall of receiving the website invitation, time since diagnosis, age, and race? (3) Could we identify profiles of nonresponders that would guide the development of future interventions to encourage engagement in health websites for families affected by inherited cancers?

METHODS

A sample of survivors who were eligible to access the website yet did not respond to the study invitation was identified by linking study IDs to the Georgia Cancer Registry information. The survey was brief and contained 27 items, including recall of the invitation, interest in ovarian cancer information, benefits of using health websites, trust in health websites, and trust in university-based health research. We conducted factor analyses, regression analyses, ANOVA, correlation analyses, and logistic regression to address research questions.

RESULTS

Of the 650 nonresponders to whom we sent the short survey, 368 (56.3%) responded and provided sufficient data for analysis. The mean response of 2.57 on the trust scale was significantly below the scale midpoint of 3 (t=11.78, P<.001), suggesting that survivors who did not log on were on average distrustful of health websites. Belonging to a racial or ethnic minority group was associated with being more trusting and less skeptical about health websites. Just 196 (30.1%) nonresponders recalled the invitation to visit the website. Logistic regression analysis indicated that age was the only significant predictor of recall. Testing a model with age, racial or ethnic minority status, and the 6 privacy concerns correctly classified 58.8% of nonresponders, a rate of successful classification that was not appreciably better than a logistic regression analysis that included only age as a predictor.

CONCLUSIONS

The nonresponders in the present study-particularly the White nonresponders-were skeptical of website platforms regardless of whether they recalled receiving a website invitation or not. Social marketing approaches geared toward building trust in web platforms by building a relationship with an information consumer and in collaboration with trusted organizations warrant further investigation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04927013; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04927013.

摘要

背景

数字健康工具,如网站,如今大量涌现,以帮助个人管理自身健康。通过用户反馈,我们开发了“你的家庭互联”(YFC)网站,以促进卵巢癌幸存者及其亲属获得基因服务。尽管我们估计一半或更多的人会访问该网站,但只有18%的受邀幸存者这样做了。我们评估了所提供信息的感知相关性、信任以及隐私担忧在多大程度上影响了不访问该网站的决定。

目的

我们设计了一项基于理论的横断面调查,以探讨以下问题:(1)未回复者在多大程度上认可隐私担忧?(2)隐私担忧与收到网站邀请的回忆、确诊后的时间、年龄和种族有关吗?(3)我们能否识别出未回复者的特征,以指导未来干预措施的制定,鼓励受遗传性癌症影响的家庭参与健康网站?

方法

通过将研究ID与佐治亚州癌症登记信息相链接,确定了有资格访问该网站但未回复研究邀请的幸存者样本。该调查简短,包含27个项目,包括对邀请的回忆、对卵巢癌信息的兴趣、使用健康网站的益处、对健康网站的信任以及对大学健康研究的信任。我们进行了因子分析、回归分析、方差分析、相关分析和逻辑回归,以解决研究问题。

结果

在我们发送简短调查问卷的650名未回复者中,368人(56.3%)做出了回复并提供了足够的分析数据。信任量表上2.57的平均回复显著低于量表中点3(t = 11.78,P <.001),这表明未登录的幸存者平均而言不信任健康网站。属于少数种族或族裔群体与对健康网站更信任且怀疑较少有关。只有196名(30.1%)未回复者回忆起了访问该网站的邀请。逻辑回归分析表明年龄是回忆的唯一显著预测因素。用年龄、种族或族裔少数群体身份以及6项隐私担忧进行模型测试,正确分类了58.8%的未回复者,这一成功分类率并不比仅将年龄作为预测因素的逻辑回归分析明显更好。

结论

本研究中的未回复者——尤其是白人未回复者——无论是否回忆起收到网站邀请,都对网站平台持怀疑态度。通过与信息消费者建立关系并与可信赖的组织合作来建立对网络平台的信任的社会营销方法值得进一步研究。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04927013;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04927013

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3979/12093066/2a4878ffe637/jmir_v27i1e64228_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3979/12093066/f5bd27d5dfb5/jmir_v27i1e64228_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3979/12093066/2a4878ffe637/jmir_v27i1e64228_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3979/12093066/f5bd27d5dfb5/jmir_v27i1e64228_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3979/12093066/2a4878ffe637/jmir_v27i1e64228_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Trust and Privacy Concerns Among Cancer Survivors Who Did Not Visit a Research Website Offering Free Genetic Counseling Services for Families: Survey Study.未访问为家庭提供免费遗传咨询服务的研究网站的癌症幸存者的信任和隐私担忧:调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 6;27:e64228. doi: 10.2196/64228.
2
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Technology-enabled CONTACT tracing in care homes in the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONTACT non-randomised mixed-methods feasibility study.新冠疫情期间养老院中基于技术的接触者追踪:CONTACT非随机混合方法可行性研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(24):1-24. doi: 10.3310/UHDN6497.
6
Is It Possible to Develop a Patient-reported Experience Measure With Lower Ceiling Effect?是否有可能开发一种天花板效应较低的患者报告体验测量方法?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):693-703. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003262. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
7
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
9
Testing a Population-Based Outreach Intervention for Ovarian Cancer Survivors to Encourage their Close Relatives to Consider Genetic Counseling.基于人群的卵巢癌幸存者随访干预措施,以鼓励其近亲考虑遗传咨询。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Sep 3;33(9):1185-1193. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0147.
10
School-based interventions TO Prevent Dating and Relationship Violence and Gender-Based Violence: STOP-DRV-GBV systematic review.基于学校的干预措施预防约会和伴侣暴力及基于性别的暴力:STOP-DRV-GBV 系统评价。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb;12(3):1-192. doi: 10.3310/KTWR6997.

本文引用的文献

1
Testing a Population-Based Outreach Intervention for Ovarian Cancer Survivors to Encourage their Close Relatives to Consider Genetic Counseling.基于人群的卵巢癌幸存者随访干预措施,以鼓励其近亲考虑遗传咨询。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Sep 3;33(9):1185-1193. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0147.
2
No Racial Disparities Observed Using Point-of-Care Genetic Counseling and Testing for Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer in a Diverse Patient Population: A Retrospective Cohort Study.在多样化患者群体中,使用即时护理遗传咨询和检测对子宫内膜癌和卵巢癌进行研究未观察到种族差异:一项回顾性队列研究
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 22;16(8):1598. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081598.
3
Barriers to and facilitators of online health information-seeking behaviours among cancer patients: A systematic review.
癌症患者在线寻求健康信息行为的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述
Digit Health. 2023 Dec 15;9:20552076231210663. doi: 10.1177/20552076231210663. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
4
Racial disparities and referral for genetic counseling.种族差异与遗传咨询转诊
Cancer. 2024 Feb 15;130(4):505-506. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35062. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
5
Your Family Connects: A Theory-Based Intervention to Encourage Communication about Possible Inherited Cancer Risk among Ovarian Cancer Survivors and Close Relatives.家庭纽带相连:一项基于理论的干预措施,旨在鼓励卵巢癌幸存者及其近亲之间就可能的遗传性癌症风险进行沟通。
Public Health Genomics. 2023;26(1):77-89. doi: 10.1159/000531772. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
6
Interventions to support patients with sharing genetic test results with at-risk relatives: a synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM).支持患者将遗传检测结果与高危亲属分享的干预措施:无荟萃分析的综合研究(SWiM)。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Sep;31(9):988-1002. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01400-1. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
7
COVID-19 and Digital Health: Evolution, Perspectives and Opportunities.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)与数字健康:演变、展望与机遇。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 12;19(14):8519. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148519.
8
A systematic review of theory-informed strategies used in interventions fostering family genetic risk communication.系统综述:理论指导策略在促进家庭遗传风险沟通干预中的应用
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):1953-1962. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
9
Applying citizen science to engage families affected by ovarian cancer in developing genetic service outreach strategies.运用公民科学让受卵巢癌影响的家庭参与制定基因服务拓展策略。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 14;17(2):e0262575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262575. eCollection 2022.
10
The Long-Term Effectiveness of Internet-Based Interventions on Multiple Health Risk Behaviors: Systematic Review and Robust Variance Estimation Meta-analysis.基于互联网的干预措施对多种健康风险行为的长期效果:系统评价和稳健方差估计荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 21;23(12):e23513. doi: 10.2196/23513.