Suppr超能文献

与其他鸽种相比,归巢鸽的嗅球并没有增大。

The olfactory bulbs of homing pigeons are not enlarged compared with other pigeon breeds.

作者信息

Racicot Kelsey J, Guyonnet Audrey E M, Brinkman Benjamin, Mehlhorn Julia, Iwaniuk Andrew N

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Dr W, Lethbridge, AB, T1K 3M4, Canada.

Institute for Anatomy I, Medical Faculty & University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2025 May 7. doi: 10.1007/s00359-025-01742-9.

Abstract

The homing pigeon (Columba livia) is one of the best examples of human selection for behaviour among domesticated animals. Several brain regions purportedly differ in size between homing and other pigeons as a result of this selection, one of which is the olfactory bulbs. Olfaction is considered by many to be one of the sensory cues homing pigeons use to orient home. The intense selection for homing could therefore have driven anatomical changes in the olfactory bulbs, the first site of olfactory processing in the brain, in homing pigeons. Here, we compared the size of the olfactory bulbs, as well as size and number of mitral cells, among homing pigeons, feral pigeons, and several sporting and show breeds. Homing pigeons did not differ in absolute of relative olfactory bulb size from wild, feral, or most other pigeon breeds. Only a small show breed (figurita frill) and a meat/show breed (king) differed in absolute and relative olfactory bulb sizes from other pigeon breeds. Similarly, there were no significant differences among breeds in the absolute or relative number of mitral cells or mitral cell soma size. The lack of significant differences among most of the pigeon breeds sampled suggests neither experience nor selection for different behavioural or physical traits affects olfactory bulb size or the number and size of mitral cells. Although the results might indicate that there is not anything special about the olfactory abilities of homing pigeons, we lack data on other aspects of olfactory bulb anatomy and the acuity and sensitivity of the olfactory system across pigeon breeds. The latter knowledge gap could be addressed through genomic and transcriptomic techniques, which would provide new insights to the ongoing debate surrounding the use of olfactory cues in homing.

摘要

家鸽(Columba livia)是人类对家畜行为进行选择的最佳例子之一。据推测,由于这种选择,归巢鸽和其他鸽子之间有几个脑区大小不同,其中之一是嗅球。许多人认为嗅觉是归巢鸽用来定向回家的感官线索之一。因此,对归巢能力的强烈选择可能导致了归巢鸽大脑中嗅觉处理的第一个部位——嗅球的解剖学变化。在这里,我们比较了归巢鸽、野生鸽以及几种赛鸽和观赏鸽品种的嗅球大小,以及僧帽细胞的大小和数量。归巢鸽与野生鸽、家鸽或大多数其他鸽种在嗅球绝对或相对大小上没有差异。只有一个小型观赏品种(figurita frill)和一个肉用/观赏品种(king)在嗅球绝对和相对大小上与其他鸽种不同。同样,各品种之间在僧帽细胞的绝对或相对数量或僧帽细胞体大小上没有显著差异。大多数抽样鸽种之间缺乏显著差异表明,无论是经验还是对不同行为或身体特征的选择,都不会影响嗅球大小或僧帽细胞的数量和大小。尽管结果可能表明归巢鸽的嗅觉能力没有什么特别之处,但我们缺乏关于嗅球解剖结构其他方面以及不同鸽种嗅觉系统敏锐度和灵敏度的数据。后一个知识空白可以通过基因组和转录组技术来填补,这将为围绕归巢中嗅觉线索使用的持续争论提供新的见解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验