Suppr超能文献

传统药用植物的抗菌活性:对抗动物伤口感染中的抗生素耐药性

Antibacterial Activity of Traditional Medicinal Plants: Combating Antibiotics Resistance in Animal Wound Infections.

作者信息

Jia Dan, Arbab Safia, Ullah Hanif, Alzahrani Khalid J, Alzahrani Fuad M, Alsharif Khalaf F, Zhang Jiyu, Li Ka

机构信息

Outpatient Department, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Lanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

Vet Med Sci. 2025 May;11(3):e70361. doi: 10.1002/vms3.70361.

Abstract

The rise of antibiotic resistance poses a significant challenge to veterinary medicine, particularly in the treatment of wound infections in animals. This study aimed to evaluate the antibacterial properties of traditional medicinal plants against four bacterial strains isolated from septic animal wound infections and to compare their effectiveness with broad-spectrum antibiotics. A total of 150 bacterial isolates were collected using sterile cotton swabs, cultured on nutrient and mannitol salt agar for growth and identified through catalase and coagulase tests. The study assessed antibiotic resistance and tested the bacterial isolates' susceptibility to medicinal plants using the disc diffusion method. Among the isolates, Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen, accounting for 26.6% (40 isolates), followed by Escherichia coli at 26% (39 isolates). Streptococcus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. were found in 20% (30 isolates) and 16% (25 isolates), respectively. Antibiogram analysis revealed notable antibiotic resistance, with S. aureus showing the highest resistance to Ciprofloxacin (60.5%) and Rifampicin (57.5%). E. coli exhibited 61.5% resistance to Ciprofloxacin and 56.4% to streptomycin. Streptococcus spp. had the highest resistance to Ciprofloxacin (53.3%), whereas Pseudomonas spp. showed the greatest resistance to Chloramphenicol (52%). Ethanol extracts of the medicinal plants, prepared using various solvents, were utilized for testing. Ethanol extracts of Loranthus acaciae and Cymbopogon proximus at concentrations of 60-90 µL demonstrated the largest inhibition zones, ranging from 55.5 ± 3.85 to 57.5 ± 2.5 mm against E. coli and S. aureus. Inhibition zones for Streptococcus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. ranged from 50 ± 2 to 48.3 ± 1.7 mm. In comparison, the standard antibiotics exhibited inhibition zones of 58.95 ± 2.55-60 ± 2.5 mm against S. aureus and E. coli, with slightly lower zones (51.65 ± 1.6-49 ± 1 mm) observed for Streptococcus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. These findings underscore the significant antibacterial activity of medicinal plants against multidrug-resistant pathogens in animal wound infections, highlighting their potential to accelerate healing, reduce infection severity and provide a cost-effective alternative to combat antibiotic resistance.

摘要

抗生素耐药性的上升给兽医学带来了重大挑战,尤其是在动物伤口感染的治疗方面。本研究旨在评估传统药用植物对从感染性动物伤口感染中分离出的四种细菌菌株的抗菌特性,并将其有效性与广谱抗生素进行比较。使用无菌棉签共收集了150株细菌分离株,在营养琼脂和甘露醇盐琼脂上培养以促进生长,并通过过氧化氢酶和凝固酶试验进行鉴定。该研究评估了抗生素耐药性,并使用纸片扩散法测试了细菌分离株对药用植物的敏感性。在分离株中,金黄色葡萄球菌是最常见的病原体,占26.6%(40株),其次是大肠杆菌,占26%(39株)。链球菌属和假单胞菌属分别占20%(30株)和16%(25株)。抗菌谱分析显示出显著的抗生素耐药性,金黄色葡萄球菌对环丙沙星(60.5%)和利福平(57.5%)的耐药性最高。大肠杆菌对环丙沙星的耐药率为61.5%,对链霉素的耐药率为56.4%。链球菌属对环丙沙星的耐药性最高(53.3%),而假单胞菌属对氯霉素的耐药性最强(52%)。使用各种溶剂制备的药用植物乙醇提取物用于测试。相思寄生和近缘香茅的乙醇提取物在浓度为60 - 90µL时,对大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的抑菌圈最大,范围为55.5±3.85至57.5±2.5毫米。链球菌属和假单胞菌属的抑菌圈范围为50±2至48.3±1.7毫米。相比之下,标准抗生素对金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌的抑菌圈为58.95±2.55至60±2.5毫米,对链球菌属和假单胞菌属的抑菌圈略小(51.65±1.6至49±1毫米)。这些发现强调了药用植物对动物伤口感染中多重耐药病原体具有显著的抗菌活性,突出了它们在加速愈合、降低感染严重程度以及提供对抗抗生素耐药性的经济有效替代方案方面的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09c8/12055452/7aaf68f42a0b/VMS3-11-e70361-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验