• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

艾滋病护理背景下的系统性不平等、尊严与信任:一项定性分析

Systemic inequities, dignity, and trust in the context of HIV care: a qualitative analysis.

作者信息

Sanchez Amanda L, Mills Chynna, Coley DeAuj'Zhane, Hoskins Katelin, Momplaisir Florence, Gross Robert, Brady Kathleen A, Beidas Rinad S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2025 May 6;24(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02481-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12939-025-02481-8
PMID:40329302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12057254/
Abstract

Adherence and retention in care are key targets to achieve favorable health outcomes for people with HIV. Challenges with adherence and retention are pronounced for marginalized communities facing intersectional structural oppression. Community health worker delivery of Managed Problem Solving (MAPS+), an evidence-based behavioral intervention, has the potential to improve adherence and retention, yet understanding structural inequities affecting people with HIV is necessary to increase the likelihood of equitable implementation. The current study explores systemic inequities influencing HIV care adherence and retention, and approaches to address these challenges. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 clinics and 4 constituent groups: prescribing clinicians, non-prescribing clinical team members (e.g., medical case managers), clinic administrators, and policymakers. Through reflexive thematic analysis within a constructionist paradigm, we identified two key themes. The first elucidated experiences of systemic inequities such as access to resources, healthcare system navigation difficulties, power differentials, medical mistrust, intersectional stigma and potential patient burden associated with MAPS+. The second theme highlighted the ways in which staff and clinicians shoulder the burden of addressing inequities by approaching people with HIV with dignity and developing trusting relationships and how MAPS + can bolster this approach by partnering with and centering patient needs. While these individual and organizational efforts are valuable, ending the HIV epidemic requires structural changes to address systemic inequities directly. This research underscores the complex interplay between structural oppression and HIV care, calling for comprehensive approaches to achieve health equity.

摘要

坚持治疗和持续接受治疗是为艾滋病毒感染者实现良好健康结果的关键目标。对于面临交叉结构性压迫的边缘化社区而言,坚持治疗和持续接受治疗面临着严峻挑战。社区卫生工作者提供的循证行为干预措施——管理式问题解决法(MAPS+),有可能改善治疗的坚持率和持续率,但要提高公平实施的可能性,就必须了解影响艾滋病毒感染者的结构性不平等问题。本研究探讨了影响艾滋病毒治疗坚持率和持续率的系统性不平等问题,以及应对这些挑战的方法。我们对13家诊所和4个组成群体进行了半结构化访谈:开处方的临床医生、非开处方的临床团队成员(如医疗病例管理人员)、诊所管理人员和政策制定者。通过建构主义范式下的反思性主题分析,我们确定了两个关键主题。第一个主题阐述了系统性不平等的经历,如资源获取、医疗系统导航困难、权力差异、医疗不信任、交叉污名以及与MAPS+相关的潜在患者负担。第二个主题强调了工作人员和临床医生通过以尊严对待艾滋病毒感染者并建立信任关系来承担解决不平等问题的负担的方式,以及MAPS+如何通过与患者需求合作并以患者需求为中心来支持这种方法。虽然这些个人和组织的努力很有价值,但要终结艾滋病毒流行,需要进行结构性变革以直接解决系统性不平等问题。这项研究强调了结构性压迫与艾滋病毒治疗之间复杂的相互作用,呼吁采取综合方法来实现健康公平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6419/12057254/0de897286451/12939_2025_2481_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6419/12057254/0de897286451/12939_2025_2481_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6419/12057254/0de897286451/12939_2025_2481_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Systemic inequities, dignity, and trust in the context of HIV care: a qualitative analysis.艾滋病护理背景下的系统性不平等、尊严与信任:一项定性分析
Int J Equity Health. 2025 May 6;24(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02481-8.
2
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
3
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
4
"There's just such a mismatch": a qualitative exploration of health systems and organizational-level barriers to accessing cancer services among people experiencing structural marginalization.“存在如此严重的不匹配”:对经历结构性边缘化的人群在获取癌症服务方面的卫生系统和组织层面障碍的定性探索。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jun 18;24(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02554-8.
5
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
6
Reducing health inequalities through general practice: a realist review and action framework.通过全科医疗减少健康不平等:一个现实主义综述和行动框架。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Mar;12(7):1-104. doi: 10.3310/YTWW7032.
7
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
8
St. Louis enhancing engagement and retention (STEER) in HIV/AIDS care: a participatory intersectional needs assessment for intervention and implementation planning.圣路易斯加强艾滋病护理中的参与度和留存率(STEER):一项用于干预和实施规划的参与性交叉需求评估
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 11;13:1589671. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1589671. eCollection 2025.
9
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
10
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing Structural Racism and Discrimination Along the Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Continuum: A Systematic Review.评估暴露前预防连续体中的结构性种族主义和歧视:系统评价。
AIDS Behav. 2024 Sep;28(9):3001-3037. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04387-y. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
2
Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing an Evidence-Based Community Health Worker Model.实施基于证据的社区卫生工作者模式的障碍和促进因素。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Mar 1;5(3):e240034. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0034.
3
"Just the Stigma Associated with PrEP Makes You Feel Like It's HIV Itself": Exploring PrEP Stigma, Skepticism, and Medical Mistrust Among Black Cisgender Women in Urban and Rural Counties in the U.S. Deep South.
“仅仅是与暴露前预防相关的污名就让你感觉像是感染了艾滋病毒本身”:在美国最南部城乡县的黑人顺性别女性中探索暴露前预防的污名、怀疑态度及对医疗的不信任
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Mar;53(3):1187-1195. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02769-2. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
4
Physicians as shock absorbers: The system of structural factors driving burnout and dissatisfaction in medicine.医生成为缓冲器:导致医学领域倦怠和不满的结构性因素体系。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Nov;337:116311. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116311. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
5
Understanding why racial/ethnic inequities along the HIV care continuum persist in the United States: a qualitative exploration of systemic barriers from the perspectives of African American/Black and Latino persons living with HIV.理解为何在美国沿着 HIV 护理连续体仍存在种族/民族不平等现象:从感染 HIV 的非裔美国人和拉丁裔人群的角度对系统性障碍进行定性探索。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Aug 30;22(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01992-6.
6
How do Lay Health Worker Engage Caregivers? A Qualitative Study to Enhance Equity in Evidence-Based Parenting Programs.非专业卫生工作者如何与照顾者互动?一项旨在提高循证育儿项目公平性的定性研究。
Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2023;8(2):221-235. doi: 10.1080/23794925.2021.1993111. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
7
A typology of power in implementation: Building on the exploration, preparation, implementation, sustainment (EPIS) framework to advance mental health and HIV health equity.实施过程中的权力类型学:基于探索、准备、实施、维持(EPIS)框架以促进心理健康和艾滋病毒健康公平。
Implement Res Pract. 2022 Jan 5;3:26334895211064250. doi: 10.1177/26334895211064250. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
8
A peer group intervention implemented by community volunteers increased HIV prevention knowledge.社区志愿者实施的同伴群体干预措施提高了艾滋病预防知识。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 10;23(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14715-3.
9
The i-frame and the s-frame: How focusing on individual-level solutions has led behavioral public policy astray.i 帧和 s 帧:关注个体层面的解决方案如何使行为公共政策误入歧途。
Behav Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 5;46:e147. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22002023.
10
An Expanded Definition of Intersectional Stigma for Public Health Research and Praxis.公共卫生研究与实践中交叉污名的扩展定义。
Am J Public Health. 2022 Jun;112(S4):S356-S361. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306718.