Whitehouse Daniel, Mikolić Ana, Czeiter Endre, Richter Sophie, Buki Andras, Wang Kevin K, Steyerberg Ewout, Maas Andrew, Menon David, Lecky Fiona, Newcombe Virginia
Division of Anaesthesia, Department of Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Neurotrauma. 2025 May 7. doi: 10.1089/neu.2024.0276.
This article explores the diagnostic performance of a panel of six biomarkers (glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], neurofilament light [NFL], neuron-specific enolase [NSE], S100 calcium-binding protein B [S100B], total tau [t-tau], and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 [UCH-L1]) in the context of the "2023 UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Head Injury: Assessment and early management (NG232)" guideline. Emphasis is placed on subjects where clinical equipoise remains concerning the decision for head computed tomography (CT), medium-risk subjects. All adult subjects from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) dataset with a complete biomarker profile and interpretable CT scan within 24 h of injury were classified as high, medium, and low-risk according to the NICE NG232 Clinical Decision Rule (CDR) for CT head imaging following head injury. In subjects classified as medium-risk, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the diagnostic performance of biomarkers to identify those with (1) CT abnormality or (2) potential neurosurgical lesion, with CT considered the gold standard diagnosis. A time-to-biomarker sub-analysis was performed in subjects with a time from injury to sampling within 6 h, in keeping with current clinical usage of biomarkers. Among 1979 CENTER-TBI participants with sufficient clinical information to facilitate classification, 385 subjects were classified as medium-risk. Biomarker concentrations were significantly higher in those with traumatic CT abnormalities as compared with those without for all biomarkers aside from NSE (all < 0.05). When sampled within 24 h of injury, GFAP demonstrated the best diagnostic performance for CT abnormality (AUC 0.81 [0.77-0.86]), with NFL, t-tau, and UCH-L1 showing moderate performance. At a threshold to provide a 95% sensitivity, GFAP, NFL, t-tau, and UCH-L1 demonstrated specificities ranging from 18% to 33% corresponding to a potential reduction of total CT images performed in these subjects by 14-23%. S100B and UCH-L1 showed improved performance when biomarker sampling time was limited to 6 h following injury. In intoxicated subjects with a persistent Glasgow Coma Score of 13-14, biomarker levels were significantly higher in subjects with CT abnormality as compared with those without. In conclusion, serum biomarkers demonstrate potential for the reduction in CT scan requirements in those classified as medium-risk in reference to the NG232 CDR criteria. These results highlight a need for further prospective studies on the use of diagnostic TBI biomarkers in current emergency medicine practice, with future consideration given to the integration of biomarkers in the NICE NG232 head injury guidelines.
本文探讨了一组六种生物标志物(胶质纤维酸性蛋白[GFAP]、神经丝轻链[NFL]、神经元特异性烯醇化酶[NSE]、S100钙结合蛋白B[S100B]、总tau蛋白[t-tau]和泛素C末端水解酶L1[UCH-L1])在“2023年英国国家卫生与保健优化研究所(NICE)头部损伤:评估与早期管理(NG232)”指南背景下的诊断性能。重点关注临床 equipoise 仍围绕头部计算机断层扫描(CT)决策的受试者,即中度风险受试者。来自欧洲创伤性脑损伤协作神经创伤有效性研究(CENTER-TBI)数据集的所有成年受试者,在受伤后24小时内具有完整的生物标志物谱和可解释的CT扫描结果,根据NICE NG232头部损伤后CT头部成像的临床决策规则(CDR)被分类为高、中、低风险。在分类为中度风险的受试者中,使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)来评估生物标志物识别以下两类患者的诊断性能:(1)CT异常或(2)潜在神经外科病变,CT被视为金标准诊断。对受伤至采样时间在6小时内的受试者进行了生物标志物时间亚分析,以符合生物标志物目前的临床使用情况。在1979名具有足够临床信息以进行分类的CENTER-TBI参与者中,385名受试者被分类为中度风险。除NSE外,所有生物标志物在有创伤性CT异常的受试者中的浓度均显著高于无异常者(均P<0.05)。在受伤后24小时内采样时,GFAP对CT异常的诊断性能最佳(AUC 0.81[0.77 - 0.86]),NFL、t-tau和UCH-L1表现中等。在提供95%敏感性的阈值下,GFAP、NFL、t-tau和UCH-L1的特异性范围为18%至33%,这意味着这些受试者中进行的CT图像总数可能减少14 - 23%。当生物标志物采样时间限制在受伤后6小时内时,S100B和UCH-L1表现出更好的性能。在格拉斯哥昏迷评分持续为13 - 14的中毒受试者中,有CT异常的受试者的生物标志物水平显著高于无异常者。总之,血清生物标志物显示出根据NG232 CDR标准减少中度风险受试者CT扫描需求的潜力。这些结果凸显了在当前急诊医学实践中对诊断性TBI生物标志物使用进行进一步前瞻性研究的必要性,未来需考虑将生物标志物纳入NICE NG232头部损伤指南。