• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《家庭照顾者药物管理困扰量表中文版的翻译、改编及验证》

Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of a Traditional Chinese Version of the Family Caregiver Medication Administration Hassle Scale.

作者信息

Ku Te-Lien, Wu Shu-Ying, Chie Wei-Chu, Huang Yen-Ming

机构信息

Social and Administrative Sciences Division, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.

Department of Pharmacy, Sijhih Cathay General Hospital, New Taipei City, 221037, Taiwan.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 May 1;19:1211-1230. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S516126. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S516126
PMID:40330534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12052010/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Family Caregiver Medication Administration Hassle Scale (FCMAHS) assesses the stress experienced by family caregivers in managing daily medication regimens for older adults. However, its suitability for the Taiwanese healthcare context has not yet been established.

OBJECTIVE

To translate, cross-culturally adapt, and evaluate the reliability and validity of a Traditional Chinese version of the FCMAHS (FCMAHS-TC).

METHODS

A two-phase cross-sectional study was conducted. In Phase I, the FCMAHS was translated into Traditional Chinese. In Phase II, a convergent mixed-methods study was carried out with a convenience sample of 138 family caregivers who completed the FCMAHS-TC. In parallel, 12 of those participants were interviewed to explore their experiences with medication administration tasks and associated stress. Content validity was assessed using the content validity index (CVI), whereas reliability was evaluated through Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed to investigate the FCMAHS-TC's factor structure. Qualitative data from interviews were analyzed using content analysis to provide triangulated evidence of scale adaptability.

RESULTS

The FCMAHS-TC demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.78). Expert evaluation indicated strong content validity, with the item- and scale-CVI value reaching 1.0. The EFA identified four key factors: information seeking and sharing, scheduling logistics, medication filling and prescription management, and safety issues, accounting for 59.57% of the total variance. Qualitative findings supported the factor structure identified and further highlighted care coordination among caregivers as an additional challenge.

CONCLUSION

The FCMAHS-TC is a valid and reliable tool for healthcare professionals in Taiwan to assess the challenges and stress associated with medication administration among family caregivers. Future research should explore social and demographic determinants of medication-related caregiving stress and develop targeted interventions to support caregivers in Taiwan.

摘要

背景

家庭照顾者药物管理困扰量表(FCMAHS)用于评估家庭照顾者在为老年人管理日常药物治疗方案时所经历的压力。然而,其在台湾医疗环境中的适用性尚未得到确立。

目的

翻译、跨文化调适并评估中文版家庭照顾者药物管理困扰量表(FCMAHS-TC)的信效度。

方法

进行了一项两阶段的横断面研究。在第一阶段,将FCMAHS翻译成中文。在第二阶段,对138名完成FCMAHS-TC的家庭照顾者进行了一项收敛性混合方法研究,这些照顾者为便利样本。同时,对其中12名参与者进行了访谈,以探讨他们在药物管理任务及相关压力方面的经历。使用内容效度指数(CVI)评估内容效度,通过Cronbach's α系数和组内相关系数(ICC)评估信度。进行探索性因素分析(EFA)以研究FCMAHS-TC的因素结构。对访谈中的定性数据进行内容分析,以提供量表适应性的三角验证证据。

结果

FCMAHS-TC表现出很强的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.94)和重测信度(ICC = 0.78)。专家评估表明内容效度高,项目和量表CVI值达到1.0。EFA确定了四个关键因素:信息寻求与共享、日程安排、药物填充与处方管理以及安全问题,占总方差的59.57%。定性研究结果支持所确定的因素结构,并进一步强调照顾者之间的护理协调是另一个挑战。

结论

FCMAHS-TC是台湾医疗专业人员评估家庭照顾者药物管理相关挑战和压力的有效且可靠的工具。未来的研究应探索与药物相关的照顾压力的社会和人口学决定因素,并制定有针对性的干预措施来支持台湾的照顾者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/016b/12052010/ca3b758915b3/PPA-19-1211-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/016b/12052010/b8a97be33c58/PPA-19-1211-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/016b/12052010/ca3b758915b3/PPA-19-1211-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/016b/12052010/b8a97be33c58/PPA-19-1211-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/016b/12052010/ca3b758915b3/PPA-19-1211-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of a Traditional Chinese Version of the Family Caregiver Medication Administration Hassle Scale.《家庭照顾者药物管理困扰量表中文版的翻译、改编及验证》
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 May 1;19:1211-1230. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S516126. eCollection 2025.
2
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Family Caregiver Medication Administration Hassles Scale.土耳其版《家庭照料者药物管理困扰量表》的信度和效度。
Fam Pract. 2024 Aug 14;41(4):596-604. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad040.
3
Use of the measurement of medication administration hassles with Mexican American family caregivers.对墨西哥裔美国家庭照顾者用药困扰测量方法的使用。
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Sep;18(18):2596-603. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02752.x. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the febrile convulsion knowledge scale for parents/caregivers: translation and validation study.针对家长/照料者的中文版热性惊厥知识量表的心理测量学评估:翻译与验证研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jun 17;23(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02073-x.
5
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of caregiver self-assessment questionnaire. caregiver 自我评估问卷土耳其语版的有效性和可靠性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Nov;42(22):3250-3255. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1587525. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
6
The Chinese Version of the DigiHealthCom (Digital Health Competence) Instrument for Assessing Digital Health Competence of Health Care Professionals: Translation, Adaptation, and Validation Study.用于评估医疗保健专业人员数字健康能力的DigiHealthCom(数字健康能力)工具中文版:翻译、改编与验证研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Mar 21;12:e65373. doi: 10.2196/65373.
7
Factors associated with medication hassles experienced by family caregivers of older adults.与老年人家庭照顾者所经历的用药困扰相关的因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Apr;66(1):51-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.10.004. Epub 2006 Nov 21.
8
Translation, adaptation, and validation of a Chinese version of the Hypertension Self-Care Activity Level effects (H-SCALE) for patients with hypertension.高血压患者中文版高血压自我护理活动水平效应量表(H-SCALE)的翻译、改编及验证
BMC Nurs. 2024 May 17;23(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01993-y.
9
A contemporary tool for assessing instrumental activities of daily living: Validation of a caregiver-reported scale for non-institutionalized older adults.一种评估日常生活工具性活动的当代工具:针对非机构化老年人的照料者报告量表的验证
PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0322554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322554. eCollection 2025.
10
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.中文版 Morisky 药物依从性量表八条目版在系统性红斑狼疮中国患者中的信度和效度。
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Sep;41(9):2713-2720. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06195-y. Epub 2022 May 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Medication management issues perceived by pharmacists and disability caregivers while supporting people with disability.药剂师和残疾护理人员在为残疾人提供支持时所察觉到的药物管理问题。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Aug 13;15:100489. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100489. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Family Caregiver Medication Administration Hassles Scale.土耳其版《家庭照料者药物管理困扰量表》的信度和效度。
Fam Pract. 2024 Aug 14;41(4):596-604. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad040.
3
A multi-center cross-sectional study of Chinese Herbal Medicine-Drug adverse reactions using active surveillance in Singapore's Traditional Chinese Medicine clinics.
一项在新加坡中医诊所采用主动监测的中药-药物不良反应多中心横断面研究。
Chin Med. 2024 Mar 7;19(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13020-024-00915-z.
4
Family conflict over illness beliefs and care strategies: implications for burden in family caregivers.家庭在疾病观念和护理策略上的冲突:对家庭照顾者负担的影响。
Aging Ment Health. 2024 Mar-Apr;28(3):457-465. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2023.2282683. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
5
Medication overload: A closer look at polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications among older people in Taiwan and Japan.药物过量:对中国台湾和日本老年人中药物多重用药和潜在不适当药物的更深入观察。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Dec;115:105100. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.105100. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
6
Trends in pharmaceutical expenditure in the Taiwan National Health Insurance database at different hospital levels.不同医院级别下的台湾全民健康保险数据库中的药品支出趋势。
J Comp Eff Res. 2023 Feb;12(2):e220162. doi: 10.2217/cer-2022-0162. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
7
Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness.医疗保健研究中的德尔菲法:如何确定其适用性。
World J Methodol. 2021 Jul 20;11(4):116-129. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116.
8
Adverse Outcomes of Polypharmacy in Older People: Systematic Review of Reviews.老年人多种药物治疗的不良后果:系统评价综述。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Feb;21(2):181-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.10.022. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
9
Medicines management issues in dementia and coping strategies used by people living with dementia and family carers: A systematic review.痴呆症药物管理问题及患者和家庭照顾者的应对策略:系统评价。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;33(12):1562-1581. doi: 10.1002/gps.4985. Epub 2018 Sep 30.
10
Is Taiwan's National Health Insurance a perfect system? Problems related to health care utilization of the aboriginal population in rural townships.台湾全民健康保险制度是否完美?以乡镇离岛地区原住民族群为对象探讨健保利用之相关问题。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Jan;34(1):e6-e10. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2653. Epub 2018 Sep 13.