• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮肤黑色素瘤的切除边缘与预后:基于人群的回顾性队列研究。

Excision margins and prognosis in cutaneous melanoma: retrospective population-based cohort study.

作者信息

Buja Alessandra, Rugge Massimo, Trevisiol Chiara, Zanovello Anna, Dall'Olmo Luigi, Zorzi Manuel, Vecchiato Antonella, Del Fiore Paolo, Paiola Matteo, Rossi Carlo Riccardo, Mocellin Simone

机构信息

Department of Cardiological, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.

Department of Medicine-DIMED, Surgical Pathology and Cytopathology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2025 May 7;9(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf042.

DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zraf042
PMID:40331740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12056717/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of surgical excision margin size on the survival of patients with cutaneous melanoma (CM) is controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of excision margins on patient outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective population-based follow-up study analysed data from patients presenting with CM without extranodal disease. The linear distance of CM from the excision margin was assessed microscopically. Regarding overall and melanoma-specific survival estimates, Kaplan-Meier analysis, the Cox proportional hazards model, and the subdistribution hazard ratio of the Fine-Gray model were applied.

RESULTS

Of 3262 patients, a total of 2698 (82.7%) with pathological (p) T1-2 and 564 (17.3%) with pT3-4 CM underwent wide local excision. Multivariable analyses, adjusting for melanoma incidence cohort, age, sex, anatomical site, ulceration, histotype, mitotic count, and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, demonstrated that, in pT1-2 CM, surgical excision > 1.1 cm resulted in significant CM-specific survival benefit. In pT4 disease, a CM distance to the surgical margins of < 1.6 cm significantly lowered CM-specific survival.

CONCLUSION

This population-based study conducted in real-world clinical practice found that the prognosis of patients with pT1-2 CM may benefit from excision margins > 1.1 cm. In pT3-4 CM, margins < 1.6 cm were significantly associated with lower CM-specific survival rates. These findings highlight the need for further prospective studies to evaluate the safety of surgical excision margins in managing primary CM.

摘要

背景

手术切缘大小对皮肤黑色素瘤(CM)患者生存的影响存在争议。本研究旨在评估切缘对患者预后的影响。

方法

这项基于人群的回顾性随访研究分析了无淋巴结外疾病的CM患者的数据。通过显微镜评估CM距切缘的线性距离。在总体生存和黑色素瘤特异性生存估计方面,应用了Kaplan-Meier分析、Cox比例风险模型以及Fine-Gray模型的亚分布风险比。

结果

3262例患者中,共有2698例(82.7%)病理(p)T1-2期和564例(17.3%)pT3-4期CM患者接受了广泛局部切除。多变量分析对黑色素瘤发病率队列、年龄、性别、解剖部位、溃疡、组织学类型、有丝分裂计数和肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞进行了校正,结果表明,在pT1-2期CM中,手术切缘>1.1 cm可带来显著的黑色素瘤特异性生存获益。在pT4期疾病中,如果CM距手术切缘<1.6 cm,则黑色素瘤特异性生存显著降低。

结论

这项在实际临床实践中开展的基于人群的研究发现,pT1-2期CM患者的预后可能受益于>1.1 cm的切缘。在pT3-4期CM中,<1.6 cm的切缘与较低的黑色素瘤特异性生存率显著相关。这些发现凸显了进一步开展前瞻性研究以评估手术切缘在原发性CM治疗中安全性的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311b/12056717/e9b5d172e9be/zraf042f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311b/12056717/d80e19dab29c/zraf042f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311b/12056717/e9b5d172e9be/zraf042f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311b/12056717/d80e19dab29c/zraf042f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311b/12056717/e9b5d172e9be/zraf042f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Excision margins and prognosis in cutaneous melanoma: retrospective population-based cohort study.皮肤黑色素瘤的切除边缘与预后:基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
BJS Open. 2025 May 7;9(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf042.
2
A retrospective study of 1- versus 2-cm excision margins for cutaneous malignant melanomas thicker than 2 mm.对于厚度大于 2 毫米的皮肤恶性黑色素瘤,1 厘米与 2 厘米切除边缘的回顾性研究。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Jun;72(6):1054-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.03.029. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
3
Are Positive Biopsy Margins in Melanoma Significant?: A Cohort Study of Micro- Versus Macroscopic Margin Status and Their Impact on Residual Disease and Survival.黑色素瘤活检切缘阳性是否具有重要意义?:一项关于微观与宏观切缘状态及其对残留疾病和生存影响的队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jan;32(1):474-481. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16301-w. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
4
Excision margins in high-risk malignant melanoma.高危恶性黑色素瘤的切除边缘
N Engl J Med. 2004 Feb 19;350(8):757-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030681.
5
2-cm versus 4-cm surgical excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma thicker than 2 mm: long-term follow-up of a multicentre, randomised trial.2cm 与 4cm 手术切缘用于 2mm 以上原发性皮肤黑色素瘤:一项多中心随机试验的长期随访。
Lancet. 2019 Aug 10;394(10197):471-477. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31132-8. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
6
Optimal excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.原发性皮肤黑色素瘤的最佳切缘:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Can J Surg. 2003 Dec;46(6):419-26.
7
2-cm versus 4-cm surgical excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma thicker than 2 mm: a randomised, multicentre trial.2cm 与 4cm 手术切缘用于厚度大于 2mm 的原发性皮肤黑色素瘤:一项随机、多中心试验。
Lancet. 2011 Nov 5;378(9803):1635-42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61546-8. Epub 2011 Oct 23.
8
Association of Excision Margin Size With Local Recurrence and Survival in Patients With T1a Melanoma at Critical Structures.临界结构 T1a 黑色素瘤患者切除边缘大小与局部复发和生存的关系。
JAMA Dermatol. 2023 Jun 1;159(6):587-595. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.0620.
9
Optimal resection margin for head and neck cutaneous melanoma.头颈部皮肤黑色素瘤的最佳切除边缘
Laryngoscope. 2019 Jun;129(6):1386-1394. doi: 10.1002/lary.27465. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
10
Wide versus narrow excision margins for high-risk, primary cutaneous melanomas: long-term follow-up of survival in a randomised trial.高危原发性皮肤黑色素瘤广泛与窄切缘切除:一项随机试验的长期生存随访
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Feb;17(2):184-192. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00482-9. Epub 2016 Jan 12.

本文引用的文献

1
European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 2: Treatment - Update 2024.欧洲基于共识的黑色素瘤跨学科指南。第2部分:治疗——2024年更新
Eur J Cancer. 2025 Jan 17;215:115153. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115153. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
2
Quality measures in primary care skin cancer management: a qualitative study of the views of key informants.初级保健皮肤癌管理中的质量措施:关键知情人观点的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 11;14(7):e080670. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080670.
3
A Review of Contemporary Guidelines and Evidence for Wide Local Excision in Primary Cutaneous Melanoma Management.
原发性皮肤黑色素瘤治疗中广泛局部切除的当代指南与证据综述
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 23;16(5):895. doi: 10.3390/cancers16050895.
4
Thirty-two-year trends of cancer incidence by sex and cancer site in the Veneto Region from 1987 to 2019.1987 年至 2019 年威尼托地区按性别和癌症部位划分的癌症发病率 32 年趋势。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 8;11:1267534. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1267534. eCollection 2023.
5
Predictors of sentinel lymph node metastasis in very thin invasive melanomas.非常薄的浸润性黑色素瘤中前哨淋巴结转移的预测因素。
Br J Dermatol. 2023 Sep 15;189(4):419-426. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad195.
6
Quality control on digital cancer registration.癌症登记数字质量控制。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 22;17(12):e0279415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279415. eCollection 2022.
7
Global Burden of Cutaneous Melanoma in 2020 and Projections to 2040.2020 年全球皮肤黑色素瘤负担及 2040 年预测。
JAMA Dermatol. 2022 May 1;158(5):495-503. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.0160.
8
Epidemiology of Melanoma.黑色素瘤流行病学。
Med Sci (Basel). 2021 Oct 20;9(4):63. doi: 10.3390/medsci9040063.
9
Surgical excision margins in primary cutaneous melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.手术切缘在原发性皮肤黑色素瘤中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul;47(7):1558-1574. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.02.025. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
10
Wide Excisional Surgery in Invasive Melanoma Treatment: Factors Driving Non-compliance With National Guidelines.广泛切除术在侵袭性黑色素瘤治疗中的应用:不遵守国家指南的因素。
Anticancer Res. 2020 Feb;40(2):1065-1069. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14044.