• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高剂量与低剂量桡侧体外冲击波疗法治疗腕管综合征的比较

Comparison of high- and low-dose radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome.

作者信息

Ceylan İsmail, Kürtüncüoğlu Büşra, Tuncay Figen, Canli Mehmet, Alkan Halil, Tayfur Abdulhamit

机构信息

Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation - Kırşehir, Turkey.

Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation - Kırşehir, Turkey.

出版信息

Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2025 May 2;71(3):e20241815. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20241815. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1590/1806-9282.20241815
PMID:40332277
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12051945/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy administered at low vs. high pressures in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.

METHODS

Patients with carpal tunnel syndrome were randomized into two groups: low-dose group and high-dose group. Each patient underwent a total of four sessions of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy, administered once a week. The radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy was delivered at 4.0 bars for the high-dose group and 1.5 bars for the low-dose group. Both groups received conventional physical therapy program consisting of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, paraffin wax, orthoses, and tendon gliding exercises, three times per week over a 4-week duration. Outcome measures included pain levels, hand grip strength, pinch strength, the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire, and nerve conduction studies.

RESULTS

Both groups exhibited improvements across all measures, except for the nerve conduction studies parameters. In the intragroup analysis, statistically significant differences were observed with small-to-moderate effect sizes for median motor distal latency, median sensory nerve conduction velocity, median sensory distal latency, and the Boston functional status subscale, all favoring the high-dose group (p<0.05). In the low-dose group, a statistically significant difference with a moderate effect size was noted solely for hand grip strength (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

High-dose radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy was significantly better than low-dose radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy with small-to-moderate effect sizes in the recovery of the function and nerve conduction studies parameters of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY

The study was registered on the Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: NCT05681663).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较低压力与高压力下的桡侧体外冲击波疗法对腕管综合征患者的疗效。

方法

将腕管综合征患者随机分为两组:低剂量组和高剂量组。每位患者总共接受4次桡侧体外冲击波治疗,每周1次。高剂量组的桡侧体外冲击波治疗压力为4.0巴,低剂量组为1.5巴。两组均接受常规物理治疗方案,包括经皮神经电刺激、石蜡疗法、矫形器和肌腱滑动练习,为期4周,每周3次。观察指标包括疼痛程度、握力、捏力、波士顿腕管综合征问卷以及神经传导研究。

结果

除神经传导研究参数外,两组在所有指标上均有改善。组内分析显示, 在正中运动远端潜伏期、正中感觉神经传导速度、正中感觉远端潜伏期和波士顿功能状态子量表方面,观察到具有小到中等效应量的统计学显著差异,均有利于高剂量组(p<0.05)。在低剂量组中,仅握力有统计学显著差异,效应量中等(p<0.05)。

结论

在腕管综合征患者的功能恢复和神经传导研究参数方面,高剂量桡侧体外冲击波疗法明显优于低剂量桡侧体外冲击波疗法,效应量小到中等。

临床试验注册

本研究已在临床试验注册中心注册(注册号:NCT05681663)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2453/12051945/51ea652c9415/1806-9282-ramb-71-03-e20241815-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2453/12051945/51ea652c9415/1806-9282-ramb-71-03-e20241815-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2453/12051945/51ea652c9415/1806-9282-ramb-71-03-e20241815-gf01.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of high- and low-dose radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome.高剂量与低剂量桡侧体外冲击波疗法治疗腕管综合征的比较
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2025 May 2;71(3):e20241815. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20241815. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical and electrophysiological efficacy of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome: a placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial.体外冲击波疗法治疗腕管综合征的临床和电生理疗效:一项安慰剂对照、双盲临床试验。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Feb 17;69(1):124-130. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20220943. eCollection 2023.
3
The effect of radial shockwave on the median nerve pathway in patients with mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized clinical trial.径向冲击波对轻中度腕管综合征患者正中神经通路的影响:一项随机临床试验。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jan 25;17(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02941-9.
4
Effectiveness of focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome : A randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study.聚焦体外冲击波治疗腕管综合征的疗效:一项随机、安慰剂对照的初步研究。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2021 Jun;133(11-12):568-577. doi: 10.1007/s00508-020-01785-9. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
5
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus local corticosteroid injection for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis.体外冲击波疗法与局部皮质类固醇注射治疗腕管综合征的Meta分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Nov 23;15(1):556. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02082-x.
6
Comparison of Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Local Corticosteroid Injection Effectiveness in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study.桡动脉外冲击波治疗与局部皮质类固醇注射治疗腕管综合征患者的疗效比较:一项随机对照研究。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jul 1;101(7):685-692. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001891. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
7
A randomized clinical trial on the changing of median nerve cross-sectional area and pain after extracorporeal shock wave and low-level laser therapy added to conventional physical therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome.一项关于体外冲击波和低强度激光疗法联合传统物理治疗对轻至中度腕管综合征患者正中神经横截面积变化及疼痛影响的随机临床试验。
J Hand Ther. 2024 Oct-Dec;37(4):555-562. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2023.12.009. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
8
Comparison of single-dose radial extracorporeal shock wave and local corticosteroid injection for treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome including mid-term efficacy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.单剂量桡侧体外冲击波与局部皮质类固醇注射治疗腕管综合征的比较,包括中期疗效:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jan 25;19(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-1948-3.
9
Efficacy of focused shockwave therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe carpal tunnel syndrome: a preliminary study.聚焦式冲击波疗法治疗中重度腕管综合征患者的疗效:初步研究。
J Rehabil Med. 2024 Feb 8;56:jrm13411. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.13411.
10
Efficacy of Manual Therapy Including Neurodynamic Techniques for the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.包括神经松动技术在内的手法治疗对腕管综合征的疗效:一项随机对照试验
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017 May;40(4):263-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Apr 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Carpal tunnel syndrome prediction with machine learning algorithms using anthropometric and strength-based measurement.使用基于人体测量和力量的测量的机器学习算法预测腕管综合征。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 17;19(4):e0300044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300044. eCollection 2024.
2
The effectiveness of mobilization with movement on patients with mild and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome: A single-blinded, randomized controlled study.运动松动术治疗轻、中度腕管综合征患者的有效性:一项单盲、随机对照研究。
J Hand Ther. 2023 Oct-Dec;36(4):773-785. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2023.02.004. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
3
Clinical and electrophysiological efficacy of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome: a placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial.
体外冲击波疗法治疗腕管综合征的临床和电生理疗效:一项安慰剂对照、双盲临床试验。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Feb 17;69(1):124-130. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20220943. eCollection 2023.
4
Comparison of Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Local Corticosteroid Injection Effectiveness in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study.桡动脉外冲击波治疗与局部皮质类固醇注射治疗腕管综合征患者的疗效比较:一项随机对照研究。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jul 1;101(7):685-692. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001891. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
5
The effect of radial shockwave on the median nerve pathway in patients with mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized clinical trial.径向冲击波对轻中度腕管综合征患者正中神经通路的影响:一项随机临床试验。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jan 25;17(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02941-9.
6
Effectiveness of Tendon and Nerve Gliding Exercises in the Treatment of Patients With Mild Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.肌腱和神经滑动运动治疗轻度特发性腕管综合征患者的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Hand (N Y). 2023 Mar;18(2):222-229. doi: 10.1177/15589447211006857. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
7
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy as a conservative treatment option for carpal tunnel syndrome: A double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study.体外冲击波疗法作为腕管综合征的一种保守治疗选择:一项双盲、前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Nov 9;66(4):388-397. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2020.3956. eCollection 2020 Dec.
8
Normative data for handgrip strength in Serbian children measured with a bulb dynamometer.用球形测力计测量的塞尔维亚儿童握力的标准数据。
J Hand Ther. 2021 Jul-Sep;34(3):479-487. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
9
The Sensitivity and Specificity of Nerve Conduction Studies for Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review.神经传导研究诊断腕管综合征的敏感性和特异性:系统评价。
Hand (N Y). 2021 Mar;16(2):174-178. doi: 10.1177/1558944719855442. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
10
Comparison of the effectiveness of orthotic intervention, kinesiotaping, and paraffin treatments in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: A single-blind and randomized controlled study.矫形器干预、运动贴扎和蜡疗治疗腕管综合征患者的疗效比较:一项单盲、随机对照研究。
J Hand Ther. 2019 Jul-Sep;32(3):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.12.006. Epub 2018 Feb 17.