Suppr超能文献

“何者为先”:宗教/精神参与还是健康?纵向分析的初步观察结果

"Which comes first": Religious/spiritual engagement or health? Initial observations from longitudinal analyses.

作者信息

Ahmad Salman S, Goodman Zachary T, Hylton Emily, Ironson Gail

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, United States of America.

Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0320410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320410. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Religious and spiritual (R/S) engagement is generally associated with better health. However, it is not known which comes first between R/S engagement and health due to a lack of longitudinal studies. We examined this issue in a sample assessed six years apart.

METHODS

Using a large nationwide sample (N = 3,010 at Wave 1; n = 607 at Wave 2) and structural equation modeling (SEM), we developed composite latent measures of R/S engagement and self-rated physical health (SRH). R/S engagement included identity, prayer, commitment, attendance, and coping. SRH included two subjective ratings of health alongside number of chronic illnesses. We examined the measurement invariance and reciprocal relationships of R/S engagement and SRH at two timepoints (six years apart), and controlled for multiple demographic variables (age, sex, education, income, race/ethnicity) as well as R/S engagement or SRH at Wave 1. We then assessed whether the strength of their relationships with each other differed.

RESULTS

Higher R/S engagement at Wave 1 significantly predicted better SRH at Wave 2 (β =.07, b = 0.09, SE = 0.04, p =.026), whereas higher SRH at Wave 1 did not significantly predict higher R/S engagement at Wave 2 (β =.02, b = 0.03, SE = 0.03, p =.224); however, such associations were not significantly different. Post-hoc weighted analyses indicated the findings were driven by older participants.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that R/S engagement predicts better SRH six years later, whereas better SRH does not significantly predict future R/S engagement. Future areas of growth in the R/S and health research field include addressing heterogeneity in the measurement of both constructs, increasing sample diversity/representation, and considering contextual nuances. Experimental methods or multiple-timepoint data, with a focus on mediators (e.g., inflammation), may help further disentangle the longitudinal relationships between R/S engagement and self-rated health.

摘要

目的

宗教和精神参与通常与更好的健康状况相关。然而,由于缺乏纵向研究,尚不清楚宗教和精神参与与健康之间哪个先出现。我们在一个相隔六年评估的样本中研究了这个问题。

方法

我们使用一个全国性的大样本(第一次调查时N = 3010;第二次调查时n = 607)和结构方程模型(SEM),开发了宗教和精神参与以及自评身体健康(SRH)的综合潜在测量指标。宗教和精神参与包括身份认同、祈祷、承诺、参加宗教活动和应对方式。SRH包括对健康的两项主观评分以及慢性病数量。我们在两个时间点(相隔六年)检验了宗教和精神参与与SRH的测量不变性和相互关系,并控制了多个人口统计学变量(年龄、性别、教育程度、收入、种族/民族)以及第一次调查时的宗教和精神参与或SRH。然后我们评估了它们相互之间关系的强度是否不同。

结果

第一次调查时较高的宗教和精神参与显著预测了第二次调查时更好的SRH(β = 0.07,b = 0.09,标准误 = 0.04,p = 0.026),而第一次调查时较高的SRH并未显著预测第二次调查时更高的宗教和精神参与(β = 0.02,b = 0.03,标准误 = 0.03,p = 0.224);然而,这种关联没有显著差异。事后加权分析表明,这些发现是由老年参与者驱动的。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,宗教和精神参与能预测六年后更好的SRH,而更好的SRH并不能显著预测未来的宗教和精神参与。宗教和精神与健康研究领域未来的发展方向包括解决这两个构念测量中的异质性、增加样本多样性/代表性以及考虑背景细微差别。实验方法或多时间点数据,重点关注中介因素(如炎症),可能有助于进一步厘清宗教和精神参与与自评健康之间的纵向关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66c7/12057932/998ac5aa6ea0/pone.0320410.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验