Suppr超能文献

针对海军男性的有氧/健身操和有氧/循环重量训练计划:一项对比研究。

Aerobic/calisthenic and aerobic/circuit weight training programs for Navy men: a comparative study.

作者信息

Marcinik E J, Hodgdon J A, Mittleman K, O'Brien J J

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1985 Aug;17(4):482-7. doi: 10.1249/00005768-198508000-00014.

Abstract

Study I. Participants were 43 Navy men (mean age = 32.1 yr) assigned to one of three exercise training protocols: aerobic/circuit weight training performed at either 40 or 60% of determined one-repetition maximum strength or aerobic/calisthenic training. During the 10-wk study, each exercise group participated in three training sessions per week performed on alternate days. The results of this study indicate that dynamic strength (both upper and lower) increased for the aerobic/circuit weight training groups but not for the aerobic/calisthenic group. With the exception of bench press endurance for the aerobic/calisthenic group, all groups showed significant increases in muscular endurance and stamina. No significant changes were seen in static strength or flexibility in any of the groups. Study II. Subjects were 87 male Navy personnel (mean age = 19.8 yr) receiving basic training at the Recruit Training Command, San Diego, CA. One company of recruits (N = 41) participated in an experimental aerobic/circuit weight training program at 70% of determined one-repetition maximum. A second company (N = 46) received the standard Navy recruit physical training program (aerobic/calisthenic training). During the 8-wk study, both groups participated in an identical running program performed three times per wk on alternate days. Additionally, aerobic/circuit weight training participants completed two circuits (1 circuit = 15 exercises) three times per wk on alternate days to running. Study findings show the experimental aerobic/circuit weight training program produced significantly greater dynamic muscular strength and muscular endurance changes than the standard aerobic/calisthenic program.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

研究一。43名海军男性(平均年龄 = 32.1岁)被分配到三种运动训练方案之一:以确定的一次重复最大力量的40%或60%进行有氧/循环重量训练,或有氧/健身操训练。在为期10周的研究中,每个运动组每周参加三次训练课程,隔天进行。该研究结果表明,有氧/循环重量训练组的动态力量(上肢和下肢)增加,而有氧/健身操组则没有。除有氧/健身操组的卧推耐力外,所有组的肌肉耐力和耐力均有显著增加。任何组的静态力量或柔韧性均未出现显著变化。研究二。87名男性海军人员(平均年龄 = 19.8岁)在加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥的新兵训练司令部接受基础训练。一个新兵连(N = 41)参加了一项实验性的有氧/循环重量训练计划,强度为确定的一次重复最大力量的70%。第二个连(N = 46)接受标准的海军新兵体能训练计划(有氧/健身操训练)。在为期8周的研究中,两组都参加了相同的跑步计划,每周进行三次,隔天进行。此外,有氧/循环重量训练参与者在隔天跑步时,每周完成两次循环训练(1个循环 = 15项练习),每次进行三次。研究结果表明,与标准的有氧/健身操计划相比,实验性的有氧/循环重量训练计划在动态肌肉力量和肌肉耐力变化方面产生了显著更大的效果。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验