Zimbatu Alexandra, Bickley Steven J, Whyte Stephen
School of Advertising, Marketing and Public Relations, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 4000, Australia.
Department of Marketing and Supply Chain Management, School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, 6211, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.
Sci Rep. 2025 May 7;15(1):15920. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00530-4.
Significant temporal landmarks often involve high emotionality, thereby deeply imprinting within one's autobiographical memory. In this study we explore the connection between anticipation, temporal landmarks, subjective passage of time and perceived wellbeing. We do this by conducting a three-stage mixed method study including qualitative thematic analysis, AI-assisted coding and analysis, and quantitative negative binomial multivariate analysis of the Past Fluency and Future Fluency reported events (n = 73,244) provided by n = 1,113 participants across the six reported (future and past) temporal horizons (One Week, One Month, One Year) in the Blursday Database during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings show that participants state more past Temporal Landmarks compared with future, while the opposite is true for Utilitarian Activities. Key sex differences exist in men's vs. women's identification of Utilitarian Activities (greater future fluency), Temporal Landmarks (greater past fluency) and fewer Discretionary Activities listed for both past and future fluency. Statistically significant relationships are found with responses about stringency of lockdown restrictions and subjective assessments of confinement. Our study provides novel methodology and findings that demonstrate how engagement in anticipatory behaviour can be considered a type of time work, where an individual intentionally alters or customizes temporal experiences during times of reduced agency.
重要的时间标志往往涉及高度的情感性,从而深深地烙印在一个人的自传体记忆中。在本研究中,我们探讨预期、时间标志、主观时间流逝和感知幸福感之间的联系。我们通过开展一项三阶段混合方法研究来做到这一点,该研究包括定性主题分析、人工智能辅助编码与分析,以及对1113名参与者在新冠疫情期间于“模糊日”数据库中报告的六个(未来和过去)时间范围(一周、一个月、一年)内提供的过去流畅性和未来流畅性报告事件(n = 73244)进行定量负二项式多变量分析。我们的研究结果表明,与未来相比,参与者陈述的过去时间标志更多,而功利性活动则相反。在男性与女性对功利性活动(未来流畅性更高)、时间标志(过去流畅性更高)的识别以及过去和未来流畅性列出的 discretionary 活动较少方面存在关键的性别差异。在关于封锁限制的严格程度的回答和对限制的主观评估方面发现了具有统计学意义的关系。我们的研究提供了新颖的方法和研究结果,表明参与预期行为如何可以被视为一种时间工作类型,即在能动性降低时期,个体有意改变或定制时间体验。