Bovo Anna, Veronese Mayra, Zanotti Renzo, Danielis Matteo
Laboratory of Studies and Evidence Based Nursing, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Med Educ Online. 2025 Dec;30(1):2500560. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2025.2500560. Epub 2025 May 8.
Interprofessional Collaboration (IPC) brings together health and social care professionals to enhance patient outcomes through mutual respect, effective communication, and shared responsibility. However, while Interprofessional Education (IPE) is essential for improving communication and care quality, its implementation remains challenging. One major obstacle is the cultural and historical difference in how nurses and physicians perceive IPC, which can hinder effective collaboration.
To explore medical students' perspectives of nurse-physician interactions.
This qualitative descriptive study examined written reports from 406 second-year medical students enrolled at the University of Padua. To identify patterns in nurse-physician interactions, data were analysed using Bales' Interaction Process Analysis categories through a deductive content analysis approach. Additionally, qualitative analysis software facilitated the coding process, with Bales' category integrated into ATLAS® Search&Code for text analysis. Furthermore, this research was conducted and reported in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines.
A total of 438 student-reported detections were extracted from the reports and categorised into 12 of the Bales' social interaction categories, revealing distinct roles and communication styles between nurses and physicians. Students detailed that nurses frequently provided opinions and orientations, reflecting a supportive role, while physicians were more inclined to seek orientation, indicating a collaborative approach. Moreover, the findings highlighted hierarchical dynamics, as nurses more likely to agree with others' decisions, whereas physicians were less engaged in passive agreement. Moreover, students observed that stress and tension were more prevalent among physicians than nurses.
The study highlights the complementary yet distinct roles of nurses and physicians in clinical settings, underscoring the importance of balanced teamwork. Addressing hierarchical dynamics and enhancing communication are crucial for improving both patient care and job satisfaction. Therefore, training programs should focus on mitigating these barriers and fostering open communication to build a more cohesive healthcare environment.
跨专业协作(IPC)汇聚了卫生和社会护理专业人员,通过相互尊重、有效沟通和共同责任来改善患者的治疗效果。然而,尽管跨专业教育(IPE)对于改善沟通和护理质量至关重要,但其实施仍然具有挑战性。一个主要障碍是护士和医生对IPC的认知在文化和历史上存在差异,这可能会阻碍有效的协作。
探讨医学生对护士与医生互动的看法。
这项定性描述性研究考察了帕多瓦大学406名二年级医学生的书面报告。为了识别护士与医生互动中的模式,通过演绎性内容分析方法,使用贝尔斯互动过程分析类别对数据进行了分析。此外,定性分析软件辅助了编码过程,将贝尔斯类别整合到ATLAS® Search&Code中进行文本分析。此外,本研究是按照定性研究报告标准指南进行并报告的。
从报告中总共提取了438个学生报告的观察结果,并归类为贝尔斯社会互动类别的12个类别,揭示了护士和医生之间不同的角色和沟通方式。学生们详细描述说,护士经常提供意见和指导,体现出支持性的角色,而医生更倾向于寻求指导,表明采用协作方式。此外,研究结果突出了等级动态,因为护士更有可能同意他人的决定,而医生较少被动同意。此外,学生们观察到医生比护士更容易出现压力和紧张情绪。
该研究强调了护士和医生在临床环境中互补但又不同的角色,强调了平衡团队合作的重要性。解决等级动态问题和加强沟通对于改善患者护理和工作满意度至关重要。因此,培训项目应侧重于消除这些障碍并促进开放沟通,以建立一个更具凝聚力的医疗环境。