• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑转移瘤患者术后立体定向放射治疗的最佳给药时间是什么时候?一项文献系统综述和荟萃分析。

Is there an optimal time to administer postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with brain metastases? A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Nwankwo Anthony, Dang Danielle D, Choe Kevin, Kanani Samir, Cohen Adam L, Ziu Mateo

机构信息

University of Virginia School of Medicine - Inova Fairfax Campus Falls Church Virginia USA.

Department of Neurosurgery Inova Fairfax Medical Campus Falls Church Virginia USA.

出版信息

Precis Radiat Oncol. 2023 Dec 3;7(4):278-285. doi: 10.1002/pro6.1214. eCollection 2023 Dec.

DOI:10.1002/pro6.1214
PMID:40336871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11935157/
Abstract

Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery improves local tumor control in patients with metastatic brain cancer. However, the influence of timing on its therapeutic efficacy is unclear. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis and systematic literature review examining publications that reported the timing of postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with intracranial metastases. Our primary outcomes included median overall survival and rates of local and regional failure, while secondary outcomes examined the incidence of treatment-related adverse events. Correlations between median SRS timing and these variables were assessed using linear regression and publication bias was appraised via Egger's test. Our study resulted in 22 articles comprising 1338 patients. The median timing of adjuvant SRS spanned 14.5 to 41 days. There was a significant negative study-level correlation of median time to SRS with regional failure ( = 0.043, R = 0.32) but not with overall survival ( = 0.54, R = 0.03) or local failure ( = 0.16, R = 0.14). Additionally, there was significant heterogeneity within the reports (<0.0001). In conclusion, our analysis demonstrated that postoperative SRS timing did not influence local failure rates which may in part be due to significant variability between individual study designs and patient demographics. Further research is warranted to elucidate the role of timing for postoperative SRS on oncologic outcomes.

摘要

术后立体定向放射外科手术可改善转移性脑癌患者的局部肿瘤控制。然而,时机对其治疗效果的影响尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们进行了一项荟萃分析和系统文献综述,审查了报告颅内转移患者术后立体定向放射外科手术(SRS)时机的出版物。我们的主要结局包括中位总生存期以及局部和区域失败率,而次要结局则研究了治疗相关不良事件的发生率。使用线性回归评估SRS中位时机与这些变量之间的相关性,并通过Egger检验评估发表偏倚。我们的研究纳入了22篇文章,共1338例患者。辅助性SRS的中位时机为14.5至41天。SRS中位时间与区域失败存在显著的负向研究水平相关性(P = 0.043,R = 0.32),但与总生存期(P = 0.54,R = 0.03)或局部失败(P = 0.16,R = 0.14)无关。此外,报告之间存在显著异质性(P<0.0001)。总之,我们的分析表明,术后SRS时机并不影响局部失败率,这可能部分归因于个体研究设计和患者人口统计学之间的显著差异。有必要进行进一步研究以阐明术后SRS时机对肿瘤学结局的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/747c/11935157/9a5aa426d0d1/PRO6-7-278-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/747c/11935157/a19162fed5a6/PRO6-7-278-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/747c/11935157/9a5aa426d0d1/PRO6-7-278-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/747c/11935157/a19162fed5a6/PRO6-7-278-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/747c/11935157/9a5aa426d0d1/PRO6-7-278-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Is there an optimal time to administer postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with brain metastases? A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.脑转移瘤患者术后立体定向放射治疗的最佳给药时间是什么时候?一项文献系统综述和荟萃分析。
Precis Radiat Oncol. 2023 Dec 3;7(4):278-285. doi: 10.1002/pro6.1214. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Stereotactic radiosurgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor brain Metastases: Systematic review and Illustrative case presentation.立体定向放射外科治疗胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤脑转移瘤:系统评价和病例报告。
J Clin Neurosci. 2024 Dec;130:110927. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110927. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
3
Stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent lapatinib is associated with improved local control for HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases.立体定向放射外科联合拉帕替尼治疗 HER2 阳性乳腺癌脑转移瘤可改善局部控制。
J Neurosurg. 2019 Feb 8;132(2):503-511. doi: 10.3171/2018.10.JNS182340. Print 2020 Feb 1.
4
Impact of 2-staged stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastases ≥ 2 cm.2 期立体定向放射外科治疗 ≥ 2 cm 的脑转移瘤的影响。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;129(2):366-382. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.JNS162532. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
5
Preoperative versus postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.脑转移瘤术前与术后立体定向放射外科治疗:比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jan 2;48(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-03166-6.
6
Early Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery to the tumor bed of resected brain metastasis for improved local control.早期对切除的脑转移瘤瘤床进行伽玛刀立体定向放射外科治疗以改善局部控制。
J Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;121 Suppl:69-74. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.GKS141488.
7
Potential role for LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of 5 or more radioresistant melanoma brain metastases.基于直线加速器的立体定向放射外科治疗5个或更多放射性抵抗性黑色素瘤脑转移瘤的潜在作用。
J Neurosurg. 2015 Nov;123(5):1261-7. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.JNS141919. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
8
Outcomes Following Early Postoperative Adjuvant Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases.脑转移瘤术后早期辅助放射外科治疗的结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2340654. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.40654.
9
Neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: a new paradigm.立体定向放射外科治疗脑转移瘤的新范例
Neurosurg Focus. 2022 Nov;53(5):E8. doi: 10.3171/2022.8.FOCUS22367.
10
Adverse radiation effect after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: incidence, time course, and risk factors.脑转移瘤立体定向放射治疗后的不良放射效应:发生率、时间进程及危险因素
J Neurosurg. 2015 Aug;123(2):373-86. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS141610. Epub 2015 May 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of neurological performance and volumetrics on overall survival in brain metastasis in colorectal cancer: a retrospective single-center case series.神经功能表现和体积学对结直肠癌脑转移患者总生存期的影响:一项回顾性单中心病例系列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 28;22(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09435-1.
2
Time to administration of stereotactic radiosurgery to the cavity after surgery for brain metastases: a real-world analysis.脑转移瘤术后立体定向放射外科治疗至瘤腔的时间:一项真实世界分析
J Neurosurg. 2021 May 28;135(6):1695-1705. doi: 10.3171/2020.10.JNS201934. Print 2021 Dec 1.
3
Current status and recent advances in resection cavity irradiation of brain metastases.
脑转移瘤切除腔照射的现状和最新进展。
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Apr 15;16(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01802-9.
4
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
5
Incidence of radionecrosis in single-fraction radiosurgery compared with fractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of brain metastasis.单剂量放射外科与分次放疗治疗脑转移瘤的放射性坏死发生率比较。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(3):e328-e333. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4749. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
6
One-sample aggregate data meta-analysis of medians.中位数的单样本汇总数据荟萃分析。
Stat Med. 2019 Mar 15;38(6):969-984. doi: 10.1002/sim.8013. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
7
Palliation of Brain Metastases: Analysis of Prognostic Factors Affecting Overall Survival.脑转移瘤的姑息治疗:影响总生存期的预后因素分析
Indian J Palliat Care. 2018 Jul-Sep;24(3):308-312. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_1_18.
8
Postsurgical Cavity Evolution After Brain Metastasis Resection: How Soon Should Postoperative Radiosurgery Follow?脑转移瘤切除术后术腔演变:术后立体定向放射治疗应多快进行?
World Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;110:e310-e314. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.159. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
9
Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery compared with whole brain radiotherapy for resected metastatic brain disease (NCCTG N107C/CEC·3): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.术后立体定向放射外科与全脑放疗治疗脑转移瘤切除术(NCCTG N107C/CEC·3):一项多中心、随机、对照、3期试验
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Aug;18(8):1049-1060. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30441-2. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
10
Post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery versus observation for completely resected brain metastases: a single-centre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.完全切除的脑转移瘤术后立体定向放射外科治疗与观察的比较:一项单中心、随机、对照、3期试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Aug;18(8):1040-1048. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30414-X. Epub 2017 Jul 4.