Suppr超能文献

加拿大职业表现测量量表丹麦语版本的反应性。

The responsiveness of the Danish version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure.

作者信息

Enemark Larsen Anette, Christensen Jeanette R, Wehberg Sonja

机构信息

Occupational Therapy, Department of Therapist and Midwifery, University College Copenhagen Faculty of Health Science, Kobenhavn N, Denmark.

Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Syddansk Universitet, Syddanmark, Denmark.

出版信息

Br J Occup Ther. 2022 Aug;85(8):561-569. doi: 10.1177/03080226211067422. Epub 2022 Feb 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To establish the responsiveness of the Danish version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM-DK).

METHOD

A cross-sectional study was performed in three Danish settings, including 88 clients, 40 men, aged 16-90 years, with a variety of diagnoses. To determine construct responsiveness, the mean changes of the COPM performance and satisfaction score (COPM-P/S) were compared and correlated with the mean changes in the five-item World Health Organization (WHO) Well-Being Index (WHO-5) and the EuroQol-five domains-five levels questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). To determine the responsiveness, data were analysed with ROC curves to establish the optimal cut-point values for the COPM-DK scores. Minimal important change (MIC) was assessed in relation to anchor-based questions.

RESULTS

The mean change for COPM-P/S was 3.1 and 3.0, respectively. Small positive correlations were found between the COPM-DK scores and the WHO-5 and EQ-5D-5L scores. The AUC were 0.76 and 0.75, respectively. The optimal cut-point values for the COPM-P/S-scores based on either all positive answers or to the two highest, were 1.2 or 4.20 (COPM-P) and 1.67 or 5.80 (COPM-S), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The capability of the COPM to detect changes in perceived occupational performance issues is supported. We recommend an MIC on 3.5 points on both scales.

摘要

引言

建立加拿大职业表现测量量表丹麦版(COPM-DK)的反应度。

方法

在丹麦的三个场所进行了一项横断面研究,纳入了88名客户,其中40名男性,年龄在16至90岁之间,患有多种诊断疾病。为了确定结构反应度,比较了COPM表现和满意度得分(COPM-P/S)的平均变化,并将其与世界卫生组织(WHO)五项幸福指数(WHO-5)和欧洲五维度五水平健康量表(EQ-5D-5L)的平均变化进行关联。为了确定反应度,用ROC曲线分析数据以确定COPM-DK得分的最佳切点值。根据基于锚定问题评估最小重要变化(MIC)。

结果

COPM-P/S的平均变化分别为3.1和3.0。COPM-DK得分与WHO-5和EQ-5D-5L得分之间存在小的正相关。AUC分别为0.76和0.75。基于所有肯定答案或两个最高答案的COPM-P/S得分的最佳切点值分别为1.2或4.20(COPM-P)和1.67或5.80(COPM-S)。

结论

支持COPM检测感知到的职业表现问题变化的能力。我们建议两个量表的MIC均为3.5分。

相似文献

3

本文引用的文献

4
9
The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature.世界卫生组织-5 幸福指数:文献系统综述。
Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167-76. doi: 10.1159/000376585. Epub 2015 Mar 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验