• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对中风患者临床实践指南中中风后自我管理证据的评估:一项系统综述。

Evaluation of the evidence for self-management post-stroke within clinical practice guidelines for people with stroke: A systematic review.

作者信息

Henry Leah, Leahy Siobhan, McCurtin Arlene, Boland Pauline

机构信息

School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Health Research Institute.

出版信息

Br J Occup Ther. 2022 Dec;85(12):923-946. doi: 10.1177/03080226221107768. Epub 2022 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1177/03080226221107768
PMID:40337346
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12033886/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Self-management post-stroke is essential where healthcare systems are stretched and stroke prevalence remains high. Self-management is recommended in stroke guidelines however, the quality of guidelines can vary and the evidence underpinning recommendations is unclear. The objectives of this paper are to identify and appraise current stroke guidelines, synthesise self-management recommendations and assess the evidentiary basis of these recommendations.

METHOD

Stroke guidelines were retrieved from a search of four databases and stroke association websites in July 2021. Four independent reviewers assessed their quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation 2nd Edition instrument. Self-management recommendations were extracted by hand, evaluated, synthesised and the evidence underpinning them appraised using the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations framework.

RESULTS

Eleven guidelines were included in this systematic review, all of excellent methodological quality overall. One hundred and sixty-one recommendations were extracted from these guidelines and grouped into ten principles of self-management. A quarter of the recommendations were underpinned by level A evidence, 32% level B and 43% level C.

CONCLUSION

Although current stroke guidelines are of high methodological quality, there are considerable inconsistencies in self-management recommendations within and between these guidelines, with varying strengths of underpinning evidence. This article identifies a need for universal consensus regarding evidence-based self-management post-stroke.

摘要

引言

在医疗系统不堪重负且中风患病率居高不下的情况下,中风后的自我管理至关重要。中风指南推荐进行自我管理,然而,指南的质量可能参差不齐,且支撑这些推荐的证据并不明确。本文的目的是识别和评估当前的中风指南,综合自我管理推荐意见,并评估这些推荐意见的证据基础。

方法

2021年7月,通过检索四个数据库和中风协会网站获取中风指南。四名独立评审员使用《指南研究与评价第2版》工具评估其质量。通过人工提取自我管理推荐意见,进行评估、综合,并使用加拿大中风最佳实践推荐框架评估其支撑证据。

结果

本系统评价纳入了11项指南,总体方法学质量均为优秀。从这些指南中提取了161条推荐意见,并归纳为自我管理的十条原则。四分之一的推荐意见有A级证据支持,32%有B级证据支持,43%有C级证据支持。

结论

尽管当前的中风指南方法学质量较高,但这些指南内部以及相互之间在自我管理推荐意见方面存在相当大的不一致性,支撑证据的力度也各不相同。本文指出需要就中风后基于证据的自我管理达成普遍共识。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the evidence for self-management post-stroke within clinical practice guidelines for people with stroke: A systematic review.针对中风患者临床实践指南中中风后自我管理证据的评估:一项系统综述。
Br J Occup Ther. 2022 Dec;85(12):923-946. doi: 10.1177/03080226221107768. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
2
Do stroke clinical practice guideline recommendations for the intervention of thickened liquids for aspiration support evidence based decision making? A systematic review and narrative synthesis.对于有吸入风险的患者,是否应该采用中风临床实践指南推荐的浓稠液体干预措施?系统评价和叙述性综合。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Dec;26(6):1744-1760. doi: 10.1111/jep.13372. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
3
Quality appraisal and descriptive analysis of clinical practice guidelines for self-managed non-pharmacological interventions of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review.对心血管疾病自我管理非药物干预临床实践指南的质量评价和描述性分析:系统评价。
J Transl Med. 2024 Feb 29;22(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-04959-5.
4
A critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on surgical treatments for spinal cord injury.对脊髓损伤手术治疗的临床实践指南的批判性评价。
Spine J. 2023 Dec;23(12):1739-1749. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.06.385. Epub 2023 Jun 18.
5
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
6
Updating contextualized clinical practice guidelines on stroke rehabilitation and low back pain management using a novel assessment framework that standardizes decisions.使用一种标准化决策的新型评估框架,更新关于中风康复和腰痛管理的情境化临床实践指南。
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Nov 4;8:643. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1588-8.
7
An updated systematic review of stroke clinical practice guidelines to inform aphasia management.更新的脑卒中临床实践指南系统评价,为失语症管理提供信息。
Int J Stroke. 2023 Oct;18(9):1029-1039. doi: 10.1177/17474930231161454. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
8
OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, part I: critical appraisal of existing treatment guidelines and systematic review of current research evidence.骨关节炎研究学会国际联盟(OARSI)关于髋和膝骨关节炎管理的建议,第一部分:对现有治疗指南的批判性评估及当前研究证据的系统评价
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Sep;15(9):981-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.06.014. Epub 2007 Aug 27.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Self-Managed Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Breast Cancer Survivors: Systematic Quality Appraisal and Content Analysis of Clinical Practice Guidelines.乳腺癌幸存者的自我管理非药物干预措施:临床实践指南的系统质量评估与内容分析
Front Oncol. 2022 May 30;12:866284. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.866284. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
2
Do stroke clinical practice guideline recommendations for the intervention of thickened liquids for aspiration support evidence based decision making? A systematic review and narrative synthesis.对于有吸入风险的患者,是否应该采用中风临床实践指南推荐的浓稠液体干预措施?系统评价和叙述性综合。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Dec;26(6):1744-1760. doi: 10.1111/jep.13372. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
3
Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice.帮助患者自助:初级卫生保健实践中自我管理支持策略的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0220116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220116. eCollection 2019.
4
: Mood, Cognition and Fatigue following Stroke, 6th edition update 2019.《中风后的情绪、认知与疲劳》,2019年第6版更新
Int J Stroke. 2020 Aug;15(6):668-688. doi: 10.1177/1747493019847334. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
5
Stem cell transplantation for ischemic stroke.缺血性中风的干细胞移植
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 5;5(5):CD007231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007231.pub3.
6
Appraisal of International Guidelines on Smoking Cessation using the AGREE II Assessment Tool.使用AGREE II评估工具对国际戒烟指南进行评估。
Ir Med J. 2019 Feb 14;112(2):867.
7
Functional, cognitive and physical outcomes 3 years after minor lacunar or cortical ischaemic stroke.腔隙性或皮质性缺血性卒中 3 年后的功能、认知和身体结局。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;90(4):436-443. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319134. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
8
Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations for Acute Stroke Management: Prehospital, Emergency Department, and Acute Inpatient Stroke Care, 6th Edition, Update 2018.加拿大急性脑卒中管理最佳实践推荐:第六版,更新于 2018 年,涵盖院前、急诊和急性住院脑卒中护理。
Int J Stroke. 2018 Dec;13(9):949-984. doi: 10.1177/1747493018786616. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
9
Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines to identify recommendations for rehabilitation after stroke and other acquired brain injuries.对临床实践指南进行系统评价,以确定中风和其他后天性脑损伤后康复的推荐建议。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 28;8(2):e018791. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018791.
10
Exploring stroke survivors' and physiotherapists' views of self-management after stroke: a qualitative study in the UK.探索中风幸存者和物理治疗师对中风后自我管理的看法:英国的一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 10;7(3):e011631. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011631.