Smith Brody A, Malaussena Zachary, Mhaskar Rahul, Docimo Salvatore
University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 560 Channelside Drive Tampa, Tampa, FL, 33602, USA.
Department of Medical Education, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA.
Hernia. 2025 May 8;29(1):162. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03351-6.
To systematically evaluate the long-term outcomes of ventral hernia repair (VHR) and reassess its classification as a definitive surgical intervention. This review synthesizes evidence on postoperative complications including recurrence, chronic pain, and patient-reported outcomes to characterize the long-term burden of VHR and its impact on patient management. This study underscores the necessity of prolonged postoperative surveillance to accurately assess surgical efficacy and inform evidence-based follow-up trategies.
A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, searching PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies with a mean or median follow-up of ≥5 years. Eligible studies reported outcomes including recurrence, reoperation, mesh infection, chronic pain, and quality of life. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using STATA MP 18 to pool event rates for each outcome.
Among 2,721 patients followed for ≥5 years, 13% (95% CI: 9-17%) experienced recurrence. Long-term complications included seroma in 11% (95% CI: 6-17%, n = 1,778) and reoperation in 8% (95% CI: 5-11%, n = 1,833) of patients. Patient-reported outcomes, including chronic pain, were collected, with 15% (95% CI: 8-23%, n = 1,220) reporting its occurrence.
This systematic review evaluates the complexity of ventral hernia repair and proposes conceptual realignment in managing ventral hernias, viewing them through the lens of chronic disease to align treatment goals with long-term patient outcomes. The data suggests that ventral hernias exhibit characteristics of a chronic condition, requiring sustained medical oversight and potential reinterventions for chronic pain, recurrence, and other quality-of-life complications.
系统评估腹疝修补术(VHR)的长期疗效,并重新评估其作为一种确定性手术干预的分类。本综述综合了关于术后并发症(包括复发、慢性疼痛和患者报告的结局)的证据,以描述VHR的长期负担及其对患者管理的影响。本研究强调了延长术后监测的必要性,以准确评估手术疗效并为循证随访策略提供依据。
按照PRISMA指南进行系统综述,在PubMed、Embase和Web of Science中检索平均或中位随访时间≥5年的研究。符合条件的研究报告了包括复发、再次手术、补片感染、慢性疼痛和生活质量在内的结局。使用STATA MP 18进行随机效应荟萃分析,以汇总每个结局的事件发生率。
在2721例随访时间≥5年的患者中,13%(95%CI:9%-17%)出现复发。长期并发症包括11%(95%CI:6%-17%,n = 1778)的患者出现血清肿,8%(95%CI:5%-11%,n = 1833)的患者需要再次手术。收集了患者报告的结局,包括慢性疼痛,15%(95%CI:8%-23%,n = 1220)的患者报告出现慢性疼痛。
本系统综述评估了腹疝修补术的复杂性,并提出了腹疝管理的概念性调整,从慢性病的角度看待腹疝,使治疗目标与患者的长期结局相一致。数据表明,腹疝具有慢性病的特征,需要持续的医疗监督以及针对慢性疼痛、复发和其他生活质量并发症的潜在再次干预。