Vu Thi Ngoc Lan, Fooladi Hosein, Kirchmair Johannes
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Josef-Holaubek-Platz 2, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Christian Doppler Laboratory for Molecular Informatics in the Biosciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Vienna, Josef-Holaubek-Platz 2, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
J Chem Inf Model. 2025 May 26;65(10):4833-4843. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5c00380. Epub 2025 May 9.
Physics-based docking methods have long been the cornerstone of structure-based virtual screening (VS). However, the emergence of machine learning (ML)-based docking approaches has opened new possibilities for enhancing VS technologies. In this study, we explore the integration of DiffDock-L, a leading ML-based pose sampling method, into VS workflows by combining it with the Vina, Gnina, and RTMScore scoring functions. We assess this integrated approach in terms of its VS effectiveness, pose sampling quality, and complementarity to traditional physics-based docking methods, such as AutoDock Vina. Our findings from the DUDE-Z benchmark dataset show that DiffDock-L performs competitively in both VS performance and pose sampling in cross-docking settings. In most cases, it generates physically plausible and biologically relevant poses, establishing itself as a viable alternative to physics-based docking algorithms. Additionally, we found that the choice of scoring function significantly influences VS success.
基于物理的对接方法长期以来一直是基于结构的虚拟筛选(VS)的基石。然而,基于机器学习(ML)的对接方法的出现为增强虚拟筛选技术开辟了新的可能性。在本研究中,我们通过将领先的基于ML的构象采样方法DiffDock-L与Vina、Gnina和RTMScore评分函数相结合,探索将其集成到虚拟筛选工作流程中。我们从虚拟筛选有效性、构象采样质量以及与传统基于物理的对接方法(如AutoDock Vina)的互补性方面评估这种集成方法。我们从DUDE-Z基准数据集得出的结果表明,DiffDock-L在交叉对接设置中的虚拟筛选性能和构象采样方面都具有竞争力。在大多数情况下,它生成了物理上合理且生物学上相关的构象,成为基于物理的对接算法的可行替代方案。此外,我们发现评分函数的选择对虚拟筛选的成功有显著影响。