Krishna Kavaish, Portsmouth Linda, Harris Courtenay, Ciccarelli Marina
Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Health Promot J Austr. 2025 Jul;36(3):e70051. doi: 10.1002/hpja.70051.
Few previous reviews have identified the characteristics of effective digital health behaviour change interventions for children and/or adolescents. This systematic review aimed to identify and report the characteristics, including the theoretical bases and the incorporated behaviour change techniques (BCTs).
CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCO), MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, ProQuest, and Web of Science were searched to identify intervention studies published in international academic peer-reviewed journals between January 2002 and May 2024 inclusive. Only studies that used a randomised controlled trial (RCT) study design to evaluate interventions were eligible for inclusion in this review. Studies were reviewed independently by two researchers to assess the risk of bias and extract data.
There were 17 study articles that met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. Twenty interventions were evaluated in the 17 articles. Ten interventions were considered to be effective and incorporated one or more of the following BCTs: (1) shaping knowledge, (2) goals and planning, (3) feedback and monitoring, (4) social support, and (5) reward. Eight effective interventions were based on one or more of the following behaviour change theories: (1) Social Cognitive Theory, (2) Theory of Planned Behaviour, (3) Transtheoretical Model-Stages of Change, (4) I-Change Model, and (5) Health Action Process Approach.
Effective interventions incorporated one or more BCTs and most were based on behaviour change theories. SO WHAT?: Findings can inform the selection of appropriate behaviour change theories and techniques in the development of future interventions for children and/or adolescents.
以往很少有综述确定针对儿童和/或青少年的有效数字健康行为改变干预措施的特征。本系统综述旨在识别并报告这些特征,包括理论基础和所采用的行为改变技术(BCTs)。
检索了CINAHL Ultimate(EBSCO)、MEDLINE(Ovid)、PubMed、ProQuest和Web of Science,以识别2002年1月至2024年5月期间在国际学术同行评审期刊上发表的干预研究。只有采用随机对照试验(RCT)研究设计来评估干预措施的研究才有资格纳入本综述。由两名研究人员独立审查研究,以评估偏倚风险并提取数据。
有17篇研究文章符合纳入标准。这17篇文章中评估了20种干预措施。10种干预措施被认为是有效的,并采用了以下一种或多种BCTs:(1)塑造知识,(2)目标与计划,(3)反馈与监测,(4)社会支持,以及(5)奖励。8种有效的干预措施基于以下一种或多种行为改变理论:(1)社会认知理论,(2)计划行为理论,(3)跨理论模型-改变阶段,(4)I-改变模型,以及(5)健康行动过程方法。
有效的干预措施采用了一种或多种BCTs,且大多数基于行为改变理论。那又如何?:研究结果可为未来针对儿童和/或青少年的干预措施开发中选择合适的行为改变理论和技术提供参考。