• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字干预措施增强心理治疗准备度:范围综述。

Digital Interventions to Enhance Readiness for Psychological Therapy: Scoping Review.

机构信息

School of Computer Science and Statistics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 30;24(8):e37851. doi: 10.2196/37851.

DOI:10.2196/37851
PMID:36040782
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9472056/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psychological therapy is an effective treatment method for mental illness; however, many people with mental illness do not seek treatment or drop out of treatment early. Increasing client uptake and engagement in therapy is key to addressing the escalating global problem of mental illness. Attitudinal barriers, such as a lack of motivation, are a leading cause of low engagement in therapy. Digital interventions to increase motivation and readiness for change hold promise as accessible and scalable solutions; however, little is known about the range of interventions being used and their feasibility as a means to increase engagement with therapy.

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to define the emerging field of digital interventions to enhance readiness for psychological therapy and detect gaps in the literature.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, Scopus, Embase, ACM Guide to Computing Literature, and IEEE Xplore Digital Library from January 1, 2006, to November 30, 2021. The PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) methodology was applied. Publications were included when they concerned a digitally delivered intervention, a specific target of which was enhancing engagement with further psychological treatment, and when this intervention occurred before the target psychological treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 45 publications met the inclusion criteria. The conditions included depression, unspecified general mental health, comorbid anxiety and depression, smoking, eating disorders, suicide, social anxiety, substance use, gambling, and psychosis. Almost half of the interventions (22/48, 46%) were web-based programs; the other formats included screening tools, videos, apps, and websites. The components of the interventions included psychoeducation, symptom assessment and feedback, information on treatment options and referrals, client testimonials, expectation management, and pro-con lists. Regarding feasibility, of the 16 controlled studies, 7 (44%) measuring actual behavior or action showed evidence of intervention effectiveness compared with controls, 7 (44%) found no differences, and 2 (12%) indicated worse behavioral outcomes. In general, the outcomes were mixed and inconclusive owing to variations in trial designs, control types, and outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital interventions to enhance readiness for psychological therapy are broad and varied. Although these easily accessible digital approaches show potential as a means of preparing people for therapy, they are not without risks. The complex nature of stigma, motivation, and individual emotional responses toward engaging in treatment for mental health difficulties suggests that a careful approach is needed when developing and evaluating digital readiness interventions. Further qualitative, naturalistic, and longitudinal research is needed to deepen our knowledge in this area.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c59/9472056/2cad71e737b5/jmir_v24i8e37851_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c59/9472056/2cad71e737b5/jmir_v24i8e37851_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c59/9472056/2cad71e737b5/jmir_v24i8e37851_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

心理治疗是治疗精神疾病的有效方法;然而,许多精神疾病患者不寻求治疗或早期退出治疗。增加患者对治疗的接受度和参与度是解决精神疾病全球日益严重问题的关键。态度障碍,如缺乏动机,是导致治疗参与度低的主要原因。增加动机和改变准备度的数字干预措施有望成为一种易于获得和可扩展的解决方案;然而,对于所使用的干预措施的范围及其作为增加对治疗的参与度的手段的可行性知之甚少。

目的

本综述旨在定义增强心理治疗准备度的数字干预措施这一新兴领域,并发现文献中的空白。

方法

从 2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 11 月 30 日,在 PubMed、PsycINFO、PsycARTICLES、Scopus、Embase、ACM 指南计算文献和 IEEE Xplore 数字图书馆中进行文献检索。应用 PRISMA-ScR(系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目扩展用于范围审查)方法。当涉及数字交付的干预措施,且该干预措施的特定目标是增强对进一步心理治疗的参与度,并且该干预措施发生在目标心理治疗之前时,出版物被包括在内。

结果

共有 45 篇出版物符合纳入标准。这些条件包括抑郁症、一般性心理健康状况不明、焦虑和抑郁症共病、吸烟、饮食失调、自杀、社交焦虑、物质使用、赌博和精神病。几乎一半的干预措施(22/48,46%)是基于网络的程序;其他形式包括筛查工具、视频、应用程序和网站。干预措施的组成部分包括心理教育、症状评估和反馈、治疗选择和转诊信息、客户推荐、期望管理和利弊清单。关于可行性,在 16 项对照研究中,7 项(44%)测量实际行为或行动的研究显示出与对照组相比干预措施有效的证据,7 项(44%)没有差异,2 项(12%)表明行为结果更差。总的来说,由于试验设计、对照类型和结果测量的差异,结果是混合的和不确定的。

结论

增强心理治疗准备度的数字干预措施广泛且多样。尽管这些易于获得的数字方法作为一种让人们为治疗做好准备的手段具有潜力,但它们并非没有风险。与心理健康困难治疗参与相关的耻辱感、动机和个体情绪反应的复杂性质表明,在开发和评估数字准备干预措施时需要谨慎。需要进一步的定性、自然主义和纵向研究来加深我们在这一领域的知识。

相似文献

1
Digital Interventions to Enhance Readiness for Psychological Therapy: Scoping Review.数字干预措施增强心理治疗准备度:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 30;24(8):e37851. doi: 10.2196/37851.
2
Digital Mental Health Interventions for Adolescents in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Scoping Review.数字心理健康干预措施在中低收入国家青少年中的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 29;26:e51376. doi: 10.2196/51376.
3
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.
4
Evaluation of the Use of Digital Mental Health Platforms and Interventions: Scoping Review.数字心理健康平台和干预措施的使用评估:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 26;20(1):362. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010362.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Acceptability of Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression and Anxiety: Systematic Review.数字心理健康干预措施治疗抑郁和焦虑的可接受性:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 28;26:e52609. doi: 10.2196/52609.
7
Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review.针对大学生抑郁、焦虑及心理健康提升的数字心理健康干预措施:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 22;21(7):e12869. doi: 10.2196/12869.
8
Mobile apps to reduce depressive symptoms and alcohol use in youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis: A systematic review.减少青少年抑郁症状和酒精使用的移动应用程序:一项系统评价和荟萃分析:一项系统评价。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 26;20(2):e1398. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1398. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer.针对成年癌症患者症状管理的电话干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 2;6(6):CD007568. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007568.pub2.
10
Behavioural interventions for type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis.2型糖尿病的行为干预:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(21):1-45. Epub 2009 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Preparing for cognitive behavioural therapy: a Delphi exercise to develop a consensus curriculum.认知行为疗法的准备工作:一项用于制定共识课程的德尔菲法研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 6;15(8):e097681. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097681.
2
Design of a mobile application for universal screening for women of child-bearing age engaged in comprehensive addiction and recovery environments (WE-CARE) for substance use and women from the general population.为处于综合成瘾与康复环境中的育龄妇女(WE-CARE)及普通人群中的妇女进行物质使用通用筛查而设计的移动应用程序。
Digit Health. 2025 Feb 26;11:20552076251318054. doi: 10.1177/20552076251318054. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Client-Identified Impacts of Helpful and Hindering Events in Psychotherapy: A Qualitative Meta-analysis.患者认定的心理治疗中有益和妨碍事件的影响:定性元分析。
Psychother Res. 2022 Jul;32(6):723-735. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2021.2003885. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
2
A Randomized Trial of Brief Online Interventions to Facilitate Treatment Seeking for Social Anxiety.一项促进社交焦虑症寻求治疗的简短在线干预随机试验。
Behav Modif. 2022 Sep;46(5):1137-1166. doi: 10.1177/01454455211040051. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
3
The Perceived Stigma Reduction Expressed by Young Adults in Response to Suicide Prevention Videos.
Women Empowered to Connect With Addiction Resources and Engage in Evidence-Based Treatment (WE-CARE)-an mHealth Application for the Universal Screening of Alcohol, Substance Use, Depression, and Anxiety: Usability and Feasibility Study.
女性赋能以连接成瘾资源并参与循证治疗(WE-CARE)——一款用于酒精、物质使用、抑郁和焦虑通用筛查的移动健康应用程序:可用性和可行性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Feb 7;9:e62915. doi: 10.2196/62915.
4
Mapping the Gaps: A Scoping Review of Virtual Care Solutions for Caregivers of Children with Chronic Illnesses.填补差距:对慢性病患儿照料者虚拟护理解决方案的范围综述
Children (Basel). 2025 Jan 10;12(1):77. doi: 10.3390/children12010077.
5
Results of a randomized controlled superiority trial of the effect of modified collaborative assessment vs. standard assessment on patients' readiness for psychotherapy (CO-ASSM-RCT).一项关于改良协作评估与标准评估对心理治疗准备度影响的随机对照优势试验(CO-ASSM-RCT)的结果。
Trials. 2024 Oct 25;25(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08517-8.
6
Use of the Therapy App Prescinde for Increasing Adherence to Smoking Cessation Treatment.使用Prescinde治疗应用程序提高戒烟治疗的依从性。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 8;11(24):3121. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11243121.
7
The impact of emotional stimuli on response inhibition in an inpatient and day-hospital patient psychosomatic cohort.情绪刺激对住院及日间医院身心疾病患者队列反应抑制的影响。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 30;14:1176721. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1176721. eCollection 2023.
8
Risk factors and digital interventions for anxiety disorders in college students: Stakeholder perspectives.大学生焦虑症的风险因素与数字干预措施:利益相关者观点
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Mar 6;11(7):1442-1457. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i7.1442.
年轻人对预防自杀视频的感知污名减少程度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 8;18(12):6180. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126180.
4
Brief online motivational interviewing pre-treatment intervention for enhancing internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy: A randomized controlled trial.简短的在线动机性访谈预处理干预以增强互联网提供的认知行为疗法:一项随机对照试验。
Internet Interv. 2021 Apr 20;25:100394. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100394. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
The ATTAIN Solution Tested: Initial Pilot Results of an Automated, Web-based Screening Tool for Unhealthy Drinking Behaviors.ATTAIN 解决方案测试:一种自动化、基于网络的不健康饮酒行为筛查工具的初步试点结果。
Perm J. 2021 May;25. doi: 10.7812/TPP/20.143.
6
Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review.数字心理健康干预措施中用户参与的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 24;23(3):e24387. doi: 10.2196/24387.
7
ICan, an Internet-based intervention to reduce cannabis use: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于互联网的干预措施减少大麻使用:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Jan 6;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04962-3.
8
Investigating the dose-response effect in open-ended psychotherapy.探究开放式心理治疗中的剂量反应效应。
Psychother Res. 2021 Sep;31(7):859-869. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2020.1861359. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
9
Consumer-Guided Development of an Engagement-Facilitation Intervention for Increasing Uptake and Adherence for Self-Guided Web-Based Mental Health Programs: Focus Groups and Online Evaluation Survey.以消费者为导向开发一种参与促进干预措施,以提高基于网络的自助心理健康项目的接受度和依从性:焦点小组和在线评估调查
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Oct 29;4(10):e22528. doi: 10.2196/22528.
10
The complex association of barriers and interest in internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for depression and anxiety: informing e-health policies through exploratory path analysis.抑郁症和焦虑症的互联网认知行为疗法中的障碍与兴趣的复杂关联:通过探索性路径分析为电子健康政策提供信息
J Ment Health. 2022 Dec;31(6):738-747. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2020.1793125. Epub 2020 Jul 25.