Wong Charlotte, Bassett Paul, Kamperidis Nikolaos, Misra Ravi, Younge Lisa, Dyall Lovesh, Yeung Katie, Rejee Christy, Arebi Naila
Department of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, St Mark's National Bowel Hospital, London, UK.
Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 May 9;25(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03909-9.
Several disparities in healthcare utilisation and delivery are reported in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We examined disparities for delays in biologic administration.
This is a tertiary centre, retrospective, cohort study of consecutive adult IBD outpatients referred to the biologics clinic (BC) for initiation of therapy over 2 years. We collected patient-, disease- and service-related data in addition to adverse clinical outcomes (primary non-response, corticosteroid prescription, IBD hospital admission and surgery) within 6 months of the first dose of therapy. The primary outcome was time-to-therapy (TTT): time interval from referral to the first drug dose. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses examined associations between variables and TTT.
240 patients started biologics: 87 (36%) ulcerative colitis (UC) and 153 (64%) Crohn's disease (CD). Median referral age was 43 years (IQR 34-56) and 128 (53%) were male. Charlson Comorbidity Index was ≤ 1 in 185 patients (77%) and 141 (59%) were biologic naïve. 91 (37.9%) were White British, 88 (36.7%) Asian (Indian or Pakistani), 61 (25.4%) were from other ethnic groups. Median TTT was 76 (IQR 56-97) days. In multivariable analysis, longer TTT was associated with CD, other ethnic groups and Adalimumab. Lack of funding at the time of BC and referral age were of borderline statistical significance. Adverse outcomes at 6 months was significantly associated with C-reactive protein level > 10 mg/L (OR 2.13; p = 0.03) but not with longer TTT.
Delays in initiating biologic therapy are significantly associated with IBD type, ethnicity and therapy type. Unwarranted variation in IBD care can be mitigated by concerted initiatives to address modifiable factors for timely access to effective therapies.
炎症性肠病(IBD)患者在医疗保健利用和服务提供方面存在多种差异。我们研究了生物制剂给药延迟方面的差异。
这是一项三级中心的回顾性队列研究,研究对象为连续两年转诊至生物制剂诊所(BC)开始治疗的成年IBD门诊患者。我们收集了患者、疾病和服务相关数据,以及首次给药后6个月内的不良临床结局(原发性无反应、皮质类固醇处方、IBD住院和手术)。主要结局是治疗时间(TTT):从转诊到首次给药的时间间隔。单因素和多因素回归分析研究了变量与TTT之间的关联。
240例患者开始使用生物制剂:87例(36%)为溃疡性结肠炎(UC),153例(64%)为克罗恩病(CD)。转诊时的中位年龄为43岁(四分位间距34 - 56岁),128例(53%)为男性。185例患者(77%)的查尔森合并症指数≤1,141例(59%)为初用生物制剂者。91例(37.9%)为英国白人,88例(36.7%)为亚洲人(印度或巴基斯坦人),61例(25.4%)来自其他种族。TTT的中位数为76天(四分位间距56 - 97天)。在多变量分析中,较长的TTT与CD、其他种族以及阿达木单抗有关。BC就诊时缺乏资金以及转诊年龄具有边缘统计学意义。6个月时的不良结局与C反应蛋白水平>10 mg/L显著相关(比值比2.13;p = 0.03),但与较长的TTT无关。
生物制剂治疗开始延迟与IBD类型、种族和治疗类型显著相关。通过采取协调一致的举措来解决可改变的因素,以确保及时获得有效治疗,可以减少IBD治疗中不必要的差异。