Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France.
Melbourne Orthopaedic Group, Melbourne, Australia.
Bone Joint J. 2021 Apr;103-B(4):610-618. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-1453.R1.
Ideal component sizing may be difficult to achieve in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Anatomical variants, incremental implant size, and a reduced surgical exposure may lead to over- or under-sizing of the components. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of UKA sizing with robotic-assisted techniques versus a conventional surgical technique.
Three groups of 93 medial UKAs were assessed. The first group was performed by a conventional technique, the second group with an image-free robotic-assisted system (Image-Free group), and the last group with an image-based robotic arm-assisted system, using a preoperative CT scan (Image-Based group). There were no demographic differences between groups. We compared six parameters on postoperative radiographs to assess UKA sizing. Incorrect sizing was defined by an over- or under-sizing greater than 3 mm.
There was a higher rate of tibial under-sizing posteriorly in the conventional group compared to robotic-assisted groups (47.3% (n = 44) in conventional group, 29% (n = 27) in Image-Free group, 6.5% (n = 6) in Image-Based group; p < 0.001), as well as a higher rate of femoral under-sizing posteriorly (30.1% (n = 28) in conventional group, 7.5% (n = 7) in Image-Free group, 12.9% (n = 12) in Image-Based group; p < 0.001). The posterior femoral offset was more often increased in the conventional group, especially in comparison to the Image-Based group (43% (n = 40) in conventional group, 30.1% (n = 28) in Image-Free group, 8.6% (n = 8) in Image-Based group; p < 0.001). There was no significant overhang of the femoral or tibial implant in any groups.
Robotic-assisted surgical techniques for medial UKA decrease the risk of tibial and femoral under-sizing, particularly with an image-based system using a preoperative CT scan. Cite this article: 2021;103-B(4):610-618.
在单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)中,理想的组件尺寸可能难以实现。解剖变异、增量植入物尺寸和手术暴露减少可能导致组件过大或过小。本研究的目的是比较机器人辅助技术与传统手术技术在 UKA 尺寸测量中的准确性。
评估了三组 93 例内侧 UKA。第一组采用传统技术,第二组采用无图像机器人辅助系统(无图像组),第三组采用基于术前 CT 扫描的图像臂机器人辅助系统(基于图像组)。三组之间没有人口统计学差异。我们比较了术后 X 线片上的六个参数来评估 UKA 的尺寸。过大或过小定义为超过或小于 3 毫米。
与机器人辅助组相比,传统组的胫骨后侧尺寸过小的发生率更高(传统组为 47.3%(n=44),无图像组为 29%(n=27),基于图像组为 6.5%(n=6);p<0.001),股骨后侧尺寸过小的发生率也更高(传统组为 30.1%(n=28),无图像组为 7.5%(n=7),基于图像组为 12.9%(n=12);p<0.001)。在传统组中,股骨后外侧偏移量增加更为常见,尤其是与基于图像组相比(传统组为 43%(n=40),无图像组为 30.1%(n=28),基于图像组为 8.6%(n=8);p<0.001)。三组中均未出现股骨或胫骨植入物的明显悬垂。
对于内侧 UKA,机器人辅助手术技术可降低胫骨和股骨尺寸过小的风险,尤其是使用基于术前 CT 扫描的图像臂系统。