Suppr超能文献

与无影像和传统技术相比,基于影像的机器人辅助系统在膝关节单髁置换术中可实现更好的假体尺寸选择。

Improved sizing with image-based robotic-assisted system compared to image-free and conventional techniques in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

机构信息

Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France.

Melbourne Orthopaedic Group, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2021 Apr;103-B(4):610-618. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-1453.R1.

Abstract

AIMS

Ideal component sizing may be difficult to achieve in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Anatomical variants, incremental implant size, and a reduced surgical exposure may lead to over- or under-sizing of the components. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of UKA sizing with robotic-assisted techniques versus a conventional surgical technique.

METHODS

Three groups of 93 medial UKAs were assessed. The first group was performed by a conventional technique, the second group with an image-free robotic-assisted system (Image-Free group), and the last group with an image-based robotic arm-assisted system, using a preoperative CT scan (Image-Based group). There were no demographic differences between groups. We compared six parameters on postoperative radiographs to assess UKA sizing. Incorrect sizing was defined by an over- or under-sizing greater than 3 mm.

RESULTS

There was a higher rate of tibial under-sizing posteriorly in the conventional group compared to robotic-assisted groups (47.3% (n = 44) in conventional group, 29% (n = 27) in Image-Free group, 6.5% (n = 6) in Image-Based group; p < 0.001), as well as a higher rate of femoral under-sizing posteriorly (30.1% (n = 28) in conventional group, 7.5% (n = 7) in Image-Free group, 12.9% (n = 12) in Image-Based group; p < 0.001). The posterior femoral offset was more often increased in the conventional group, especially in comparison to the Image-Based group (43% (n = 40) in conventional group, 30.1% (n = 28) in Image-Free group, 8.6% (n = 8) in Image-Based group; p < 0.001). There was no significant overhang of the femoral or tibial implant in any groups.

CONCLUSION

Robotic-assisted surgical techniques for medial UKA decrease the risk of tibial and femoral under-sizing, particularly with an image-based system using a preoperative CT scan. Cite this article:  2021;103-B(4):610-618.

摘要

目的

在单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)中,理想的组件尺寸可能难以实现。解剖变异、增量植入物尺寸和手术暴露减少可能导致组件过大或过小。本研究的目的是比较机器人辅助技术与传统手术技术在 UKA 尺寸测量中的准确性。

方法

评估了三组 93 例内侧 UKA。第一组采用传统技术,第二组采用无图像机器人辅助系统(无图像组),第三组采用基于术前 CT 扫描的图像臂机器人辅助系统(基于图像组)。三组之间没有人口统计学差异。我们比较了术后 X 线片上的六个参数来评估 UKA 的尺寸。过大或过小定义为超过或小于 3 毫米。

结果

与机器人辅助组相比,传统组的胫骨后侧尺寸过小的发生率更高(传统组为 47.3%(n=44),无图像组为 29%(n=27),基于图像组为 6.5%(n=6);p<0.001),股骨后侧尺寸过小的发生率也更高(传统组为 30.1%(n=28),无图像组为 7.5%(n=7),基于图像组为 12.9%(n=12);p<0.001)。在传统组中,股骨后外侧偏移量增加更为常见,尤其是与基于图像组相比(传统组为 43%(n=40),无图像组为 30.1%(n=28),基于图像组为 8.6%(n=8);p<0.001)。三组中均未出现股骨或胫骨植入物的明显悬垂。

结论

对于内侧 UKA,机器人辅助手术技术可降低胫骨和股骨尺寸过小的风险,尤其是使用基于术前 CT 扫描的图像臂系统。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验