Sumner Brett, Martin Rachelle, Gladman Tehmina, Wilkinson Tim J, Grainger Rebecca
Department of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Newtown, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand.
Education Unit, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 9;25(1):682. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07194-8.
Rapid technological advancements have left medical graduates potentially underprepared for the digital healthcare environment. Despite the importance of digital health education, consensus on essential primary medical degree content is lacking. Focusing on core competence domains can address critical skills while minimising additions to an already demanding curriculum. This study identifies the minimum essential digital health competency domains from the perspectives of learners, teachers, and content experts aiming to provide a framework for integrating digital health education into medical curricula.
We conducted focus groups with students (n = 17), and semi-structured interviews with medical educators (n = 12) and digital sector experts (n = 11) using video conferencing. Participants were recruited using purposive sampling. The data were analysed using framework analysis and inductive thematic analysis to identify common themes.
Four core themes and eleven sub-themes were identified and aggregated into four essential competency domains: "Understand the Local Digital Health Ecosystem and Landscape", "Safe, Secure and Ethical Information Literacy and Management", "Proficiency in Digital Health Tools and Associated Technologies" and "Scholarly Research and Evidence-based Practice". Medical educator and digital sector expert participants provided the greatest source of data for curriculum content consideration. Students demonstrated varying levels of aptitude, confidence, and interest in technology.
Our balanced engagement with learners, educators, and digital health experts enabled the identification of a context-relevant framework for the minimum essential digital health competence domains for graduating medical students. The identification of focused, clinically relevant core competencies makes them amenable to integration into an existing curriculum tailored to local contexts. This approach addresses limitations of restricted curricular space and accommodates varying student interests, confidence and aptitude in technology. The delivery approach should consider a student-centred adaptive modality that takes advantage of advances in artificial intelligence (AI) as an effective pedagogical tool.
快速的技术进步使医学毕业生可能对数字医疗环境准备不足。尽管数字健康教育很重要,但对于医学本科学位的基本内容尚未达成共识。关注核心能力领域可以解决关键技能问题,同时尽量减少对本就要求很高的课程的额外增加。本研究从学习者、教师和内容专家的角度确定了最低限度的基本数字健康能力领域,旨在为将数字健康教育纳入医学课程提供一个框架。
我们通过视频会议对学生(n = 17)进行了焦点小组讨论,并对医学教育工作者(n = 12)和数字领域专家(n = 11)进行了半结构化访谈。采用目的抽样法招募参与者。使用框架分析和归纳主题分析对数据进行分析,以确定共同主题。
确定了四个核心主题和十一个子主题,并汇总为四个基本能力领域:“了解当地数字健康生态系统和格局”、“安全、可靠和符合伦理的信息素养与管理”、“数字健康工具及相关技术的熟练程度”以及“学术研究与循证实践”。医学教育工作者和数字领域专家参与者为课程内容考虑提供了最大的数据来源。学生在技术方面表现出不同程度的能力、信心和兴趣。
我们与学习者、教育工作者和数字健康专家的均衡互动,使得能够确定一个与实际情况相关的框架,用于确定即将毕业的医学生所需的最低限度基本数字健康能力领域。确定重点突出、与临床相关的核心能力使其适合整合到针对当地情况量身定制的现有课程中。这种方法解决了课程空间有限的局限性,并适应了学生在技术方面不同的兴趣、信心和能力。授课方式应考虑以学生为中心的自适应模式,利用人工智能(AI)的进步作为一种有效的教学工具。