• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于肠促胰岛素的药物与2型糖尿病患者子宫内膜癌的发病率:活性对照新使用者设计

Incretin-Based Drugs and the Incidence of Endometrial Cancer Among People with Type 2 Diabetes: Active Comparator New-User Design.

作者信息

Rothman Sonny M, Yin Hui, Yu Oriana H Y, Pollak Michael, Azoulay Laurent

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote Sainte-Catherine, H425.1, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2, Canada.

Department of Epidemiology, and Occupational Health, McGill University, BiostatisticsMontreal, QC, H3A 1G1, Canada.

出版信息

Drug Saf. 2025 May 10. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01551-8.

DOI:10.1007/s40264-025-01551-8
PMID:40347221
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The use of incretin-based drugs may be associated with a decreased risk of endometrial cancer among women with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Using data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink and linked databases, two new-user active comparator cohorts of women with type 2 diabetes who initiated glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) or sulfonylureas (cohort 1) and DPP-4 inhibitors or sulfonylureas (cohort 2) were assembled. Propensity score fine stratification weighted Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for incident endometrial cancer.

RESULTS

Cohort 1 included 9239 new users of GLP-1 RAs and 80,086 new users of sulfonylureas. The GLP-1 RAs were not associated with a decreased risk of endometrial cancer when compared with sulfonylureas (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.66-1.88). In a duration-response secondary analysis, use of GLP-1 RAs for more than two years was associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer (HR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.37-4.43) when compared to sulfonylureas When analysed by drug type, exenatide was associated with an elevated risk when compared to sulfonylureas (HR: 2.26, 95% CI:1.06-4.82). Cohort 2 included 42,486 new users of DPP-4 inhibitors and 79,353 new users of sulfonylureas. DPP-4 inhibitors were not associated with a decreased risk of endometrial cancer compared with sulfonylureas (HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.76-1.32). In a duration-response secondary analysis, use of DPP-4 inhibitors for more than two years was associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer (HR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.14-2.33) when compared to sulfonylureas.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based study, the use of GLP-1 RAs and DPP-4 inhibitors was not associated with a decreased risk of endometrial cancer when compared with the use of sulfonylureas among women with type 2 diabetes.

摘要

引言

在2型糖尿病女性中,使用基于肠促胰岛素的药物可能与子宫内膜癌风险降低有关。

方法

利用英国临床实践研究数据链和相关数据库的数据,组建了两个新用户活性对照队列,即开始使用胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)或磺脲类药物的2型糖尿病女性队列(队列1),以及开始使用二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP-4抑制剂)或磺脲类药物的2型糖尿病女性队列(队列2)。采用倾向评分精细分层加权Cox比例风险模型来估计子宫内膜癌发病的调整风险比(HRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。

结果

队列1包括9239名GLP-1 RAs新用户和80,086名磺脲类药物新用户。与磺脲类药物相比,GLP-1 RAs与子宫内膜癌风险降低无关(HR:1.11,95% CI:0.66 - 1.88)。在一项时长 - 反应的二次分析中,与磺脲类药物相比,使用GLP-1 RAs超过两年与子宫内膜癌风险增加有关(HR:2.47,95% CI:1.37 - 4.43)。按药物类型分析时,与磺脲类药物相比,艾塞那肽与风险升高有关(HR:2.26,95% CI:1.06 - 4.82)。队列2包括42,486名DPP-4抑制剂新用户和79,353名磺脲类药物新用户。与磺脲类药物相比,DPP-4抑制剂与子宫内膜癌风险降低无关(HR:1.00,95% CI:0.76 - 1.32)。在一项时长 - 反应的二次分析中,与磺脲类药物相比,使用DPP-4抑制剂超过两年与子宫内膜癌风险增加有关(HR:1.63,95% CI:

相似文献

1
Incretin-Based Drugs and the Incidence of Endometrial Cancer Among People with Type 2 Diabetes: Active Comparator New-User Design.基于肠促胰岛素的药物与2型糖尿病患者子宫内膜癌的发病率:活性对照新使用者设计
Drug Saf. 2025 May 10. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01551-8.
2
GLP-1RA Use and Thyroid Cancer Risk.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的使用与甲状腺癌风险
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Mar 1;151(3):243-252. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.4852.
3
Dipeptidyl-peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 analogues for prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its associated complications in people at increased risk for the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus.二肽基肽酶(DPP)-4抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽(GLP)-1类似物用于预防或延缓2型糖尿病高危人群发生2型糖尿病及其相关并发症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 10;5(5):CD012204. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012204.pub2.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors, Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors, and Sulfonylureas for Sight-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy.胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂、钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2 抑制剂、二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂和磺脲类药物治疗威胁视力的糖尿病视网膜病变的疗效比较。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2024 Oct;8(10):943-952. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2024.05.003. Epub 2024 May 11.
5
Incretin treatment and risk of pancreatitis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies.肠降血糖素治疗与 2 型糖尿病患者胰腺炎风险:随机和非随机研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2014 Apr 15;348:g2366. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2366.
6
Risk of Thyroid Tumors With GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Retrospective Cohort Study.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂与甲状腺肿瘤风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
Diabetes Care. 2025 Aug 1;48(8):1386-1394. doi: 10.2337/dc25-0154.
7
Association between autoimmune diseases and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: A real-world evidence study.自身免疫性疾病与胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂之间的关联:一项真实世界证据研究。
J Autoimmun. 2025 Jul;155:103453. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2025.103453. Epub 2025 Jun 21.
8
Differentiating among incretin therapies: a multiple-target approach to type 2 diabetes.区分肠促胰岛素治疗:2 型糖尿病的多靶点方法。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012 Oct;37(5):510-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2012.01342.x. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
9
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors, Erythrocytosis, and Thrombosis in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.2型糖尿病成人患者中的钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂、红细胞增多症和血栓形成
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2517086. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.17086.
10
Newer agents for blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and economic evaluation.新型 2 型糖尿病血糖控制药物:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jul;14(36):1-248. doi: 10.3310/hta14360.

本文引用的文献

1
The application of lag times in cancer pharmacoepidemiology: a narrative review.滞后时间在癌症药物流行病学中的应用:叙述性综述。
Ann Epidemiol. 2023 Aug;84:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.05.004. Epub 2023 May 9.
2
Diabetes mellitus and endometrial carcinoma: Risk factors and etiological links.糖尿病与子宫内膜癌:危险因素和病因学联系。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Aug 26;101(34):e30299. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030299.
3
Impact of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Endometrial Cancer Survival: A Prospective Database Analysis.
2型糖尿病对子宫内膜癌生存的影响:一项前瞻性数据库分析
Front Oncol. 2022 May 5;12:899262. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.899262. eCollection 2022.
4
An ecological evaluation of the increasing incidence of endometrial cancer and the obesity epidemic.子宫内膜癌发病率上升与肥胖症流行的生态学评估。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 May;224(5):506.e1-506.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.042. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
5
Concurrent and future risk of endometrial cancer in women with endometrial hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.患有子宫内膜增生的女性同时及未来发生子宫内膜癌的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 28;15(4):e0232231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232231. eCollection 2020.
6
Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners.使用基于倾向评分的加权法在观察性研究中进行混杂因素调整的替代方法:从业者入门指南
BMJ. 2019 Oct 23;367:l5657. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5657.
7
Data resource profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum.数据资源简介:临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)奥鲁姆
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Dec 1;48(6):1740-1740g. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz034.
8
Antidiabetic Medications and the Risk of Endometrial Cancer in Patients.抗糖尿病药物与患者子宫内膜癌风险的关系。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2019;84(5):455-462. doi: 10.1159/000497202. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
9
Expression of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor and its role in regulating autophagy in endometrial cancer.胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体的表达及其在调控子宫内膜癌自噬中的作用。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jun 15;18(1):657. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4570-8.
10
Statistical primer: propensity score matching and its alternatives.统计入门:倾向评分匹配及其替代方法。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Jun 1;53(6):1112-1117. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy167.