• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮肤赘生物的去除:在一项随机个体内对照、观察者盲法的临床试验中比较剪刀切除与非剥脱性532nm倍频Nd:YAG激光治疗:激光并不总是更好。

Removal of skin tags: scissor excision versus non-ablative 532nm-LBO-laser in a randomized intraindividual controlled observer-blinded clinical trial : Laser is not always better.

作者信息

Haase Ozan, Winkelmann-Schirmer Charlotte, Mrowka Petra, Krengel Sven

机构信息

Hautpartner, Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 May 10;317(1):753. doi: 10.1007/s00403-025-04242-7.

DOI:10.1007/s00403-025-04242-7
PMID:40347285
Abstract

Fibroma pendulans, commonly known as skin tag, is a benign protrusion of connective tissue that often develops groupwise in areas subjected to mechanical friction. Although generally harmless, they can become cosmetically concerning or painful if infarcted. Traditional removal methods, such as electrocautery and cryotherapy, often result in hypopigmentation or scarring. Lasers became interesting for skin-tag removal, but are they really more effective than classical scissor snip exisions? This study aimed to compare the efficacy, healing outcomes, and patient acceptance of scissor snip excision versus 532 nm LBO laser therapy for the removal of skin tags. 68 patients with a total of 1,257 fibromas located on the neck or axillae were treated. Each patient received both treatments in a randomized split-neck/axillar manner. Fibromas were either excised using scissors or treated with the non-ablative 532 nm LBO laser. Outcomes were evaluated at 4 and 12 weeks post-treatment, focusing on complete healing, patient preference, pain perception, and cosmetic results. At 12 weeks, the scissor excision group exhibited a significantly higher healing rate of 85% compared to 71% in the laser group (p = 0.00001). The adjusted overall response rate was 92.64% for scissor excision and 84.19% for laser treatment. Patient preference favored scissor excision, with 63% of patients opting for this method for future treatments, while 19% preferred the laser, and 18% were indifferent. Pain scores were lower for scissor excision (mean: 2.6) compared to laser treatment (mean: 3.42). Laser therapy was 39% faster than scissor excision when accounting for wound dressing, although it had higher rates of redness, hyper- and hypopigmentation. The bloodless nature of the laser and the absence of dressings were perceived as advantages, but the persistence of necrotic fibromas for up to three weeks was a notable drawback. Despite the perceived advantages of a bloodless and dressing-free procedure with the 532 nm LBO laser, scissor snip excision demonstrated superior healing outcomes, lower pain scores, and higher patient satisfaction. These findings suggest that scissor snip excision remains the gold standard for treating pedunculated fibromas, though further studies exploring the effect of the 532 nm laser on small disseminated fibromas and other laser modalities are warranted.

摘要

悬垂性纤维瘤,俗称皮赘,是一种结缔组织的良性突出物,常在受到机械摩擦的部位成群出现。虽然通常无害,但如果发生梗死,可能会影响美观或引起疼痛。传统的去除方法,如电灼和冷冻疗法,常常会导致色素沉着减退或瘢痕形成。激光在去除皮赘方面引起了人们的兴趣,但它们真的比传统的剪刀切除更有效吗?本研究旨在比较剪刀切除与532nm倍频Nd:YAG激光治疗去除皮赘的疗效、愈合效果和患者接受度。对68例患者共1257个位于颈部或腋窝的纤维瘤进行了治疗。每位患者均以随机分颈/腋的方式接受两种治疗。纤维瘤要么用剪刀切除,要么用非剥脱性532nm倍频Nd:YAG激光治疗。在治疗后4周和12周评估结果,重点关注完全愈合、患者偏好、疼痛感知和美容效果。在12周时,剪刀切除组的愈合率显著高于激光组,分别为85%和71%(p = 0.00001)。剪刀切除的调整后总体有效率为92.64%,激光治疗为84.19%。患者更倾向于剪刀切除,63%的患者选择该方法用于未来治疗,19%的患者更喜欢激光治疗,18%的患者无差异。剪刀切除的疼痛评分(平均:2.6)低于激光治疗(平均:3.42)。考虑到伤口敷料,激光治疗比剪刀切除快39%,尽管其发红、色素沉着过度和色素沉着减退的发生率更高。激光的无血性质和无需敷料被视为优点,但坏死性纤维瘤持续长达三周是一个明显的缺点。尽管532nm倍频Nd:YAG激光具有无血和无需敷料的优势,但剪刀切除显示出更好的愈合效果、更低的疼痛评分和更高的患者满意度。这些发现表明,剪刀切除仍然是治疗带蒂纤维瘤的金标准,不过有必要进一步研究532nm激光对小的散在性纤维瘤的影响以及其他激光方式。

相似文献

1
Removal of skin tags: scissor excision versus non-ablative 532nm-LBO-laser in a randomized intraindividual controlled observer-blinded clinical trial : Laser is not always better.皮肤赘生物的去除:在一项随机个体内对照、观察者盲法的临床试验中比较剪刀切除与非剥脱性532nm倍频Nd:YAG激光治疗:激光并不总是更好。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 May 10;317(1):753. doi: 10.1007/s00403-025-04242-7.
2
Treatment of pigmentary disorders in patients with skin of color with a novel 755 nm picosecond, Q-switched ruby, and Q-switched Nd:YAG nanosecond lasers: A retrospective photographic review.用新型755纳米皮秒、调Q红宝石和调Q钕:钇铝石榴石纳秒激光治疗有色人种患者色素沉着性疾病:一项回顾性照片评估。
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Feb;48(2):181-7. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22454.
3
Minimizing skin cancer surgical scars using ablative fractional Er:YAG laser treatment.使用剥脱性分次铒钇铝石榴石激光治疗将皮肤癌手术疤痕降至最低。
J Drugs Dermatol. 2013 Oct;12(10):1171-3.
4
Laser treatments in early wound healing improve scar appearance: a randomized split-wound trial with nonablative fractional laser exposures vs. untreated controls.早期伤口愈合中的激光治疗可改善疤痕外观:非剥脱性点阵激光与未治疗对照的随机分割伤口试验。
Br J Dermatol. 2018 Dec;179(6):1307-1314. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17076. Epub 2018 Sep 30.
5
Hypertrophic scarring of the neck following ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing.剥脱性分数二氧化碳激光换肤术后颈部增生性瘢痕形成。
Lasers Surg Med. 2009 Mar;41(3):185-8. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20755.
6
1550-nm Nonablative Fractional Laser Versus 10,600-nm Ablative Fractional Laser in the Treatment of Surgical and Traumatic Scars: A Comparison Study on Efficacy and Treatment Regimen.1550nm 非剥脱性点阵激光与 10600nm 剥脱性点阵激光治疗手术和外伤性瘢痕的疗效和治疗方案比较研究。
Dermatol Surg. 2020 Jun;46(6):780-788. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002152.
7
Fractionated Er:YAG laser versus fully ablative Er:YAG laser for scar revision: Results of a split scar, double blinded, prospective trial.分次铒激光与完全剥脱性铒激光用于瘢痕修复:一项瘢痕切开、双盲、前瞻性试验的结果
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Nov;48(9):837-843. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22562. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
8
Neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd:YAG) 1064-nm picosecond laser vs. Nd:YAG 1064-nm nanosecond laser in tattoo removal: a randomized controlled single-blind clinical trial.掺钕钇铝石榴石(Nd:YAG)1064nm 皮秒激光与 Nd:YAG 1064nm 纳秒激光治疗纹身的比较:一项随机对照单盲临床试验。
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Feb;176(2):457-464. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14962. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
9
Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin.皮肤基底细胞癌的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 17;11(11):CD003412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003412.pub3.
10
GreenLight 180W XPS photovaporization of the prostate: how I do it.前列腺的绿光180W XPS光汽化术:我的操作方法。
Can J Urol. 2011 Oct;18(5):5918-26.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation and Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Cryotherapy and Electrosurgery in the Treatment of Sebaceous Hyperplasia, Seborrheic Keratosis, Cherry Angioma, and Skin Tag: A Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial Study.冷冻疗法与电外科手术治疗皮脂腺增生、脂溢性角化病、樱桃状血管瘤和皮肤软纤维瘤的疗效及安全性评估与比较:一项双盲随机临床试验研究
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 7;7(11):e70154. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70154. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
S2k-Leitlinie: Lasertherapie der Haut.S2k指南:皮肤激光治疗
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2022 Sep;20(9):1248-1270. doi: 10.1111/ddg.14879_g.
3
The metabolic profile in patients with skin tags.
皮肤赘生物患者的代谢特征。
Clin Exp Med. 2010 Sep;10(3):193-7. doi: 10.1007/s10238-009-0086-5. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
4
Standard guidelines of care: CO2 laser for removal of benign skin lesions and resurfacing.标准护理指南:使用二氧化碳激光去除良性皮肤病变及进行皮肤表面重塑。
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2008 Jan;74 Suppl:S61-7.
5
Friction induced skin tags.摩擦引起的皮赘。
Dermatol Online J. 2008 Mar 15;14(3):18.
6
Common benign skin tumors.常见的良性皮肤肿瘤。
Am Fam Physician. 2003 Feb 15;67(4):729-38.
7
Skin tags: localization and frequencies according to sex and age.皮赘:根据性别和年龄的分布位置及发生率
Dermatologica. 1987;174(4):180-3. doi: 10.1159/000249169.