Suppr超能文献

皮肤赘生物的去除:在一项随机个体内对照、观察者盲法的临床试验中比较剪刀切除与非剥脱性532nm倍频Nd:YAG激光治疗:激光并不总是更好。

Removal of skin tags: scissor excision versus non-ablative 532nm-LBO-laser in a randomized intraindividual controlled observer-blinded clinical trial : Laser is not always better.

作者信息

Haase Ozan, Winkelmann-Schirmer Charlotte, Mrowka Petra, Krengel Sven

机构信息

Hautpartner, Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 May 10;317(1):753. doi: 10.1007/s00403-025-04242-7.

Abstract

Fibroma pendulans, commonly known as skin tag, is a benign protrusion of connective tissue that often develops groupwise in areas subjected to mechanical friction. Although generally harmless, they can become cosmetically concerning or painful if infarcted. Traditional removal methods, such as electrocautery and cryotherapy, often result in hypopigmentation or scarring. Lasers became interesting for skin-tag removal, but are they really more effective than classical scissor snip exisions? This study aimed to compare the efficacy, healing outcomes, and patient acceptance of scissor snip excision versus 532 nm LBO laser therapy for the removal of skin tags. 68 patients with a total of 1,257 fibromas located on the neck or axillae were treated. Each patient received both treatments in a randomized split-neck/axillar manner. Fibromas were either excised using scissors or treated with the non-ablative 532 nm LBO laser. Outcomes were evaluated at 4 and 12 weeks post-treatment, focusing on complete healing, patient preference, pain perception, and cosmetic results. At 12 weeks, the scissor excision group exhibited a significantly higher healing rate of 85% compared to 71% in the laser group (p = 0.00001). The adjusted overall response rate was 92.64% for scissor excision and 84.19% for laser treatment. Patient preference favored scissor excision, with 63% of patients opting for this method for future treatments, while 19% preferred the laser, and 18% were indifferent. Pain scores were lower for scissor excision (mean: 2.6) compared to laser treatment (mean: 3.42). Laser therapy was 39% faster than scissor excision when accounting for wound dressing, although it had higher rates of redness, hyper- and hypopigmentation. The bloodless nature of the laser and the absence of dressings were perceived as advantages, but the persistence of necrotic fibromas for up to three weeks was a notable drawback. Despite the perceived advantages of a bloodless and dressing-free procedure with the 532 nm LBO laser, scissor snip excision demonstrated superior healing outcomes, lower pain scores, and higher patient satisfaction. These findings suggest that scissor snip excision remains the gold standard for treating pedunculated fibromas, though further studies exploring the effect of the 532 nm laser on small disseminated fibromas and other laser modalities are warranted.

摘要

悬垂性纤维瘤,俗称皮赘,是一种结缔组织的良性突出物,常在受到机械摩擦的部位成群出现。虽然通常无害,但如果发生梗死,可能会影响美观或引起疼痛。传统的去除方法,如电灼和冷冻疗法,常常会导致色素沉着减退或瘢痕形成。激光在去除皮赘方面引起了人们的兴趣,但它们真的比传统的剪刀切除更有效吗?本研究旨在比较剪刀切除与532nm倍频Nd:YAG激光治疗去除皮赘的疗效、愈合效果和患者接受度。对68例患者共1257个位于颈部或腋窝的纤维瘤进行了治疗。每位患者均以随机分颈/腋的方式接受两种治疗。纤维瘤要么用剪刀切除,要么用非剥脱性532nm倍频Nd:YAG激光治疗。在治疗后4周和12周评估结果,重点关注完全愈合、患者偏好、疼痛感知和美容效果。在12周时,剪刀切除组的愈合率显著高于激光组,分别为85%和71%(p = 0.00001)。剪刀切除的调整后总体有效率为92.64%,激光治疗为84.19%。患者更倾向于剪刀切除,63%的患者选择该方法用于未来治疗,19%的患者更喜欢激光治疗,18%的患者无差异。剪刀切除的疼痛评分(平均:2.6)低于激光治疗(平均:3.42)。考虑到伤口敷料,激光治疗比剪刀切除快39%,尽管其发红、色素沉着过度和色素沉着减退的发生率更高。激光的无血性质和无需敷料被视为优点,但坏死性纤维瘤持续长达三周是一个明显的缺点。尽管532nm倍频Nd:YAG激光具有无血和无需敷料的优势,但剪刀切除显示出更好的愈合效果、更低的疼痛评分和更高的患者满意度。这些发现表明,剪刀切除仍然是治疗带蒂纤维瘤的金标准,不过有必要进一步研究532nm激光对小的散在性纤维瘤的影响以及其他激光方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验