• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能语音的性别、性别角色一致性与对自动驾驶车辆的信任。

Artificial intelligence voice gender, gender role congruity, and trust in automated vehicles.

作者信息

Zhang Qiaoning, Yang X Jessie, Robert Lionel P

机构信息

Human Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ, USA.

Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 May 11;15(1):16364. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00884-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-00884-9
PMID:40348746
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12065868/
Abstract

Existing research on human-automated vehicle (AV) interactions has largely focused on auditory explanations, with less attention to how voice characteristics shape user trust. This paper explores the influence of gender similarity between users and AV voices and the role of gender-role congruity rooted in societal stereotypes on cognitive and affective trust in AVs. Findings reveal that gender-role congruity moderates the relationship between gender similarity and trust. When an AV's voice gender aligns with its expected role, gender similarity enhances cognitive and affective trust. However, when gender roles were not congruent, the trust-enhancing effect of gender similarity diminishes. These findings highlight the importance of considering gender in AV voice design for conveying critical driving information and reveal how societal stereotypes shape AV design. The study offers insights for enhancing user trust and acceptance of AV technology, suggesting future research directions for developing AV systems that avoid reinforcing social biases.

摘要

现有的关于人类与自动驾驶汽车(AV)交互的研究主要集中在听觉解释上,较少关注语音特征如何塑造用户信任。本文探讨了用户与AV语音之间的性别相似性的影响,以及植根于社会刻板印象的性别角色一致性对AV认知和情感信任的作用。研究结果表明,性别角色一致性调节了性别相似性与信任之间的关系。当AV的语音性别与其预期角色一致时,性别相似性会增强认知和情感信任。然而,当性别角色不一致时,性别相似性的信任增强效果会减弱。这些发现凸显了在AV语音设计中考虑性别因素以传达关键驾驶信息的重要性,并揭示了社会刻板印象如何塑造AV设计。该研究为增强用户对AV技术的信任和接受度提供了见解,为开发避免强化社会偏见的AV系统提出了未来的研究方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cb5/12065868/ee0a353b0a48/41598_2025_884_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cb5/12065868/e60bd3bec048/41598_2025_884_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cb5/12065868/3e6c0551d47c/41598_2025_884_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cb5/12065868/ee0a353b0a48/41598_2025_884_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cb5/12065868/e60bd3bec048/41598_2025_884_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cb5/12065868/3e6c0551d47c/41598_2025_884_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cb5/12065868/ee0a353b0a48/41598_2025_884_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Artificial intelligence voice gender, gender role congruity, and trust in automated vehicles.人工智能语音的性别、性别角色一致性与对自动驾驶车辆的信任。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 11;15(1):16364. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00884-9.
2
Shared intention and shared awareness for conditional automated driving: An online, randomized video experiment.条件自动驾驶的共享意图与共享意识:一项在线随机视频实验。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2025;26(4):398-406. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2421215. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
3
User comfort and naturalness of automated driving: The effect of vehicle kinematic and proxemic factors on subjective response.用户对自动驾驶的舒适度和自然感:车辆运动学和近体因素对主观反应的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2025 Jan;122:104397. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104397. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
4
Fostering Drivers' Trust in Automated Driving Styles: The Role of Driver Perception of Automated Driving Maneuvers.促进驾驶员对自动驾驶风格的信任:驾驶员对自动驾驶动作感知的作用。
Hum Factors. 2024 Jul;66(7):1961-1976. doi: 10.1177/00187208231189661. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
5
Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver's driving styles.自动驾驶汽车中的驾驶员信任、接受和接管行为:自动驾驶风格和驾驶员驾驶风格的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Sep;159:106238. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106238. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
6
Driving Aggressively or Conservatively? Investigating the Effects of Automated Vehicle Interaction Type and Road Event on Drivers' Trust and Preferred Driving Style.激进驾驶还是保守驾驶?研究自动驾驶车辆交互类型和道路事件对驾驶员信任和偏好驾驶风格的影响。
Hum Factors. 2024 Sep;66(9):2166-2178. doi: 10.1177/00187208231181199. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
7
Conflict resolution behavior of autonomous vehicles at intersections under mixed traffic environment.混合交通环境下自动驾驶车辆在交叉路口的冲突解决行为
Accid Anal Prev. 2025 Mar;211:107897. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107897. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
8
Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving.引言很重要:操纵对自动化的信任和对自动驾驶的依赖。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Jan;66:18-31. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
9
Communication via motion - Suitability of automated vehicle movements to negotiate the right of way in road bottleneck scenarios.通过动作进行交流——自动驾驶车辆运动在道路瓶颈场景中协商通行权的适用性。
Appl Ergon. 2021 Sep;95:103438. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103438. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
10
Pedestrians' perceptions, fixations, and decisions towards automated vehicles with varied appearances.行人对外观各异的自动驾驶车辆的认知、注视和决策。
Accid Anal Prev. 2025 Mar;211:107889. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107889. Epub 2024 Dec 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Knowledge as a key determinant of public support for autonomous vehicles.知识作为公众对自动驾驶汽车支持度的关键决定因素。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 25;14(1):2156. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52103-6.
2
Trust within human-machine collectives depends on the perceived consensus about cooperative norms.人机集体中的信任取决于对合作规范的共识感知。
Nat Commun. 2023 May 30;14(1):3108. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38592-5.
3
A multinational empirical study of perceived cyber barriers to automated vehicles deployment.一项针对自动化车辆部署的感知网络安全障碍的跨国实证研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 1;13(1):1842. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29018-9.
4
A study of safety acceptance and behavioral interventions for autonomous driving technologies.自动驾驶技术的安全性验收和行为干预研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 25;12(1):17891. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22720-0.
5
Relationship Development with Humanoid Social Robots: Applying Interpersonal Theories to Human-Robot Interaction.人形社交机器人的关系发展:将人际关系理论应用于人机交互。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 May;24(5):294-299. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0181. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
6
On the use of simulation in robotics: Opportunities, challenges, and suggestions for moving forward.关于机器人技术中仿真的应用:机遇、挑战和前进的建议。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 7;118(1). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907856118.
7
Social behavior for autonomous vehicles.自主车辆的社会行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 10;116(50):24972-24978. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820676116. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
8
Comparing Prescriptive and Descriptive Gender Stereotypes About Children, Adults, and the Elderly.比较关于儿童、成年人和老年人的规定性和描述性性别刻板印象。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 26;9:1086. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01086. eCollection 2018.
9
Voice, Articulation, and Prosody Contribute to Listener Perceptions of Speaker Gender: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.嗓音、发音和韵律对听众对说话者性别的认知有影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Feb 15;61(2):266-297. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-17-0067.
10
Alexa, Siri, Cortana, and More: An Introduction to Voice Assistants.Alexa、Siri、Cortana 及其他:语音助手介绍。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2018 Jan-Mar;37(1):81-88. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2018.1404391.