Yesilkir Sevval, Sahin Gizem Ergezen
Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkiye.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2025 May 11:10538127251338170. doi: 10.1177/10538127251338170.
BackgroundChronic ankle instability (CAI) is a widespread condition in athletes, characterized by recurrent episodes of ankle "giving way," diminished neuromuscular control and balance deficits. Traditional rehabilitation programmes typically emphasize strength and posture control, while more effective strategies incorporate balance training, including open chain exercises, vestibular training and multi-planar movements. In addition, novel approaches such as Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization (DNS) present an innovative method that aims to restore functional stability by activating the brain's natural movement control mechanisms.ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine and compare the impacts of balance and DNS training on functionality, instability severity, stabilization, balance, reaction time and performance in amateur athletes with CAI.MethodsThis single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted with 36 amateur athletes (DNS training group: n = 12, balance training group: n = 12, conventional training group: n = 12) over a 6-week period. The DNS training group participated in exercises based on DNS principles, while the balance training group focused on training to enhance postural stability and vestibular function, and the conventional training group underwent conventional rehabilitation. The primary outcomes were measured using the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) and Y Balance Test (YBT). Secondary measures were assessed through the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), Foot Lift Test (FLT), Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) and BlazePod™ Reaction Time (RT) Test. Assessments were carried out at three distinct time points: at baseline (pre-test), following 6 weeks of training (post-test), and at 12 weeks (follow-up test).ResultsDNS and balance training significantly improved all measures compared to conventional therapy (p < 0.05). DNS training showed significant superiority in FLT score, while balance training demonstrated significant performance increase in foam surface single-leg stance and foam surface tandem stance subscales of the BESS, with the high effect sizes (ranging from 0.95 to 1.00).ConclusionInnovative and effective interventions, such as DNS and balance training, play a crucial role in the rehabilitation processes of amateur athletes with CAI, with these effects being sustained in the long term.
背景
慢性踝关节不稳(CAI)在运动员中是一种普遍存在的病症,其特征为踝关节反复出现“打软”现象、神经肌肉控制能力下降以及平衡功能缺陷。传统康复方案通常强调力量和姿势控制,而更有效的策略则纳入了平衡训练,包括开链运动、前庭训练和多平面运动。此外,诸如动态神经肌肉稳定化(DNS)等新方法提出了一种创新方式,旨在通过激活大脑的自然运动控制机制来恢复功能稳定性。
目的
本研究旨在确定并比较平衡训练和DNS训练对患有CAI的业余运动员的功能、不稳严重程度、稳定性、平衡、反应时间和运动表现的影响。
方法
本单盲随机对照试验对36名业余运动员进行了为期6周的研究(DNS训练组:n = 12,平衡训练组:n = 12,传统训练组:n = 12)。DNS训练组参与基于DNS原则的练习,而平衡训练组专注于增强姿势稳定性和前庭功能的训练,传统训练组则接受传统康复治疗。主要结局指标使用坎伯兰踝关节不稳工具(CAIT)和Y平衡测试(YBT)进行测量。次要指标通过足踝能力测量(FAAM)、足背屈测试(FLT)、平衡误差评分系统(BESS)和BlazePod™反应时间(RT)测试进行评估。评估在三个不同时间点进行:基线(预测试)、训练6周后(后测试)以及12周时(随访测试)。
结果
与传统治疗相比,DNS训练和平衡训练显著改善了所有测量指标(p < 0.05)。DNS训练在FLT评分上显示出显著优势,而平衡训练在BESS的泡沫表面单腿站立和泡沫表面串联站立子量表上表现出显著的性能提升,效应量较高(范围为0.95至1.00)。
结论
诸如DNS训练和平衡训练等创新且有效的干预措施在患有CAI的业余运动员的康复过程中起着关键作用,且这些效果在长期内得以维持。