Kim Kyung-Min, Estepa-Gallego Alejandro, Estudillo-Martínez María D, Castellote-Caballero Yolanda, Cruz-Díaz David
Department of Sport Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon-si 16419, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Department of Kinesiology and Sport Sciences, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA.
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jul 22;10(8):1364. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081364.
(1) Background: Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is a complex condition that includes limited mobility, perceived instability, and recurrent ankle sprains are common characteristics that reduce the quality of life in subjects who suffer from CAI. Neuromuscular training and strength training have been recommended in CAI management interventions. However, there are contradictory findings on results when comparing neuromuscular training, strength training, and the control group. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 8 weeks of neuromuscular intervention training, strength training, and no intervention in a sporting population with reported CAI. (2) Methods: Sixty-seven athletes with CAI were randomly assigned to a neuromuscular training group (NG), strength training group (SG), or control group (CG). Participants completed 8 weeks of neuromuscular training (a combination of static and dynamic exercises), strength training (resistance band exercises), or no training. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks and included selfs-reported instability feeling (CAIT), dynamic balance (SEBT), ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (WBLT), and functional status (FAAM and FAAM-SPORT). (3) Results: There were significant differences between strength and control groups in the posteromedial direction of SEBT, FAAM, and FAAM-SPORT after 8 weeks of intervention. (4) Conclusions: Neuromuscular training and strength training based on resistance bands exercises showed significant improvements in ankle dorsiflexion, subjective feeling of instability, functional status, and dynamic balance in patients with CAI.
(1) 背景:慢性踝关节不稳(CAI)是一种复杂的病症,其特征包括活动受限、感觉不稳以及反复出现的踝关节扭伤,这些情况会降低患有CAI的受试者的生活质量。在CAI的管理干预中,推荐进行神经肌肉训练和力量训练。然而,在比较神经肌肉训练、力量训练和对照组的结果时,存在相互矛盾的发现。本研究的目的是比较8周的神经肌肉干预训练、力量训练以及对报告患有CAI的运动人群不进行干预的效果。(2) 方法:67名患有CAI的运动员被随机分配到神经肌肉训练组(NG)、力量训练组(SG)或对照组(CG)。参与者完成了8周的神经肌肉训练(静态和动态练习相结合)、力量训练(弹力带练习)或不进行训练。在基线和8周后评估结果指标,包括自我报告的不稳感(CAIT)、动态平衡(SEBT)、踝关节背屈活动范围(WBLT)以及功能状态(FAAM和FAAM-SPORT)。(3) 结果:干预8周后,力量训练组和对照组在SEBT的后内侧方向、FAAM和FAAM-SPORT方面存在显著差异。(4) 结论:基于弹力带练习的神经肌肉训练和力量训练在患有CAI的患者的踝关节背屈、主观不稳感、功能状态和动态平衡方面显示出显著改善。