Ginting Pricella A, Padmasawitri Tjokorde Ia, Hanum Nadia, Nurhayati Raden D, Soeroto Arto Y, Amalia Lia
Department of Pharmacology-Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia.
Department of Internal Medicine Dr. H. A Rotinsulu Lung Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia.
Narra J. 2025 Apr;5(1):e2170. doi: 10.52225/narra.v5i1.2170. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
Antibiotics are frequently prescribed to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, often without evidence of bacterial superinfection, increasing the risk of antibiotic resistance and posing a public health threat. The aim of this study was to evaluate antibiotic prescribing patterns in COVID-19 patients with suspected secondary infections and to assess the association between antibiotic use and clinical outcomes, particularly leukocyte count. The study analyzed 376 hospitalized COVID-19 patients from two hospitals in Bandung, Indonesia, between 2020 and 2022. All included patients were aged ≥17 years with confirmed COVID-19, leukocyte count >11,000 μg/L, and received antibiotic therapy. The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical/Defined Daily Dose (ATC/DDD) and drug utilization (DU) 90% were used to assess prescribing patterns. The patients' demographic characteristics, clinical and culture results were also collected. Our data indicated that most patients received multiple antibiotics (>2), with prescribing patterns significantly associated with age, confirmed bacterial pathogen, length of hospital stay and having tuberculosis infection. The most frequently identified pathogens included Gram-positive bacteria and Gram-negative bacteria and The most frequently prescribed antibiotics were azithromycin, levofloxacin, and ceftriaxone. No significant association was found between the number of antibiotics prescribed and clinical outcome (leukocyte normalization). Broad-spectrum antibiotics from the World Health Organization (WHO) AWaRe "Watch" category dominated the antibiotic prescriptions in the patients. While antibiotic selection was generally aligned with pathogen type and comorbidities, standardized guidelines remain crucial to optimizing antibiotic use, particularly in settings with limited pathogen testing.
抗生素经常被开给2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者,通常在没有细菌二重感染证据的情况下使用,这增加了抗生素耐药性的风险,并对公共卫生构成威胁。本研究的目的是评估疑似继发感染的COVID-19患者的抗生素处方模式,并评估抗生素使用与临床结局之间的关联,特别是白细胞计数。该研究分析了2020年至2022年期间印度尼西亚万隆两家医院的376名住院COVID-19患者。所有纳入患者年龄≥17岁,确诊为COVID-19,白细胞计数>11,000μg/L,并接受了抗生素治疗。采用解剖治疗化学/限定日剂量(ATC/DDD)和药物利用(DU)90%来评估处方模式。还收集了患者的人口统计学特征、临床和培养结果。我们的数据表明,大多数患者接受了多种抗生素(>2种),处方模式与年龄、确诊的细菌病原体、住院时间和患有结核病感染显著相关。最常鉴定出的病原体包括革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌,最常处方的抗生素是阿奇霉素、左氧氟沙星和头孢曲松。在开具的抗生素数量与临床结局(白细胞恢复正常)之间未发现显著关联。世界卫生组织(WHO)AWaRe“观察”类别的广谱抗生素在患者的抗生素处方中占主导地位。虽然抗生素的选择通常与病原体类型和合并症相符,但标准化指南对于优化抗生素使用仍然至关重要,特别是在病原体检测有限的环境中。