• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

塞尔维亚医学研究人员的研究伦理教育需求评估

Research ethics education needs assessment in Serbian medical researchers.

作者信息

Stojkovic Vida Jeremic, Cvjetkovic Smiljana, Stamenkovic Zeljka, Jankovic Janko, Piperac Pavle, Ristic Dragana Ignjatovic, Markovic Ivanka, Rhodes Rosamond

机构信息

University of Belgrade Faculty of Medicine, Department of Humanities.

University of Belgrade Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Social Medicine.

出版信息

Ethics Behav. 2025;35(4):320-332. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2024.2382402. Epub 2024 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1080/10508422.2024.2382402
PMID:40352268
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12061031/
Abstract

The lack of formal education in research ethics is a significant issue for the ethical conduct of research in Serbia. We conducted a cross-sectional survey in a sample of researchers and ethics committee members in Serbia to evaluate their self-assessed competence and educational needs in research ethics. Results indicated that previous ethics education had a significant effect on respondents' perception of their own competence in addressing issues like informed consent, authorship and publishing. Respondents expressed a high motivation for further research ethics education. Moreover, the study revealed that researchers with different specializations and different research experience have different educational needs.

摘要

在塞尔维亚,缺乏研究伦理方面的正规教育是研究伦理行为的一个重大问题。我们对塞尔维亚的研究人员和伦理委员会成员样本进行了一项横断面调查,以评估他们在研究伦理方面的自我评估能力和教育需求。结果表明,先前的伦理教育对受访者在处理诸如知情同意、作者身份和发表等问题时对自身能力的认知有显著影响。受访者表达了对进一步开展研究伦理教育的强烈意愿。此外,研究还表明,不同专业和不同研究经验的研究人员有不同的教育需求。

相似文献

1
Research ethics education needs assessment in Serbian medical researchers.塞尔维亚医学研究人员的研究伦理教育需求评估
Ethics Behav. 2025;35(4):320-332. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2024.2382402. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
2
Awareness of Medical Professionals Regarding Research Ethics in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A Survey to Assess Training Needs.沙特阿拉伯利雅得一家三级医疗医院的医学专业人员对研究伦理的认知:一项评估培训需求的调查
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 12;11(20):2718. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202718.
3
Ethics and professionalism in medical physics: a survey of AAPM members.医学物理学中的伦理与专业精神:AAPM 会员调查。
Med Phys. 2013 Apr;40(4):047001. doi: 10.1118/1.4797463.
4
Views of research ethics committee members on end-of-participation communications for trial participants who stop taking part: a cross-sectional survey study.研究伦理委员会成员对停止参与试验的参与者的参与结束沟通的看法:一项横断面调查研究。
Trials. 2024 Sep 30;25(1):636. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08465-3.
5
Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand.研究提案和知情同意过程的伦理考虑:泰国研究人员和伦理委员会成员的在线调查。
Account Res. 2019 Apr;26(3):176-197. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2019.1608190. Epub 2019 May 16.
6
Towards a Framework for Research Ethics Education for Physicians in Serbia.构建塞尔维亚医生研究伦理教育框架
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Jun;26(3):1249-1266. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00136-w. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
7
Perceptions of nursing faculty regarding ethical issues in nursing research.护理教师对护理研究中伦理问题的看法。
J Nurs Educ. 2004 Jun;43(6):270-9. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20040601-03.
8
Effectiveness of ethics education as perceived by nursing students: development and testing of a novel assessment instrument.护生对伦理教育有效性的认知:一种新型评估工具的开发与测试
Nurs Ethics. 2015 May;22(3):287-306. doi: 10.1177/0969733014538888. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
9
Incorporating principles and practical wisdom in research ethics education: a preliminary study.将原则与实践智慧融入研究伦理教育:一项初步研究。
Acad Med. 2007 Jan;82(1):18-23. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000250028.51329.6b.
10
WASP (write a scientific paper): The ethical stages of publishing a research paper.撰写科学论文(WASP):发表研究论文的伦理阶段。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;13(Suppl 1):S44-S47. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_675_18.

引用本文的文献

1
Fogarty-Funded Research Ethics Training Programs in Eastern Europe.由福格蒂基金资助的东欧研究伦理培训项目。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2025 Apr 13:15562646251332709. doi: 10.1177/15562646251332709.

本文引用的文献

1
Rethinking the role of Research Ethics Committees in the light of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 on clinical trials and the COVID-19 pandemic.重新思考研究伦理委员会在法规 (EU) No 536/2014 临床试验和 COVID-19 大流行中的作用。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jan;88(1):40-46. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14871. Epub 2021 May 5.
2
Healthcare professionals' ethical competence: A scoping review.医疗保健专业人员的道德能力:一项范围综述。
Nurs Open. 2018 Jul 16;6(1):5-17. doi: 10.1002/nop2.173. eCollection 2019 Jan.
3
CE: Moral Distress: A Catalyst in Building Moral Resilience.CE:道德困扰:构建道德复原力的催化剂。
Am J Nurs. 2016 Jul;116(7):40-9. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000484933.40476.5b.
4
The essential role of medical ethics education in achieving professionalism: the Romanell Report.医学伦理教育在实现专业精神方面的重要作用:罗曼内尔报告
Acad Med. 2015 Jun;90(6):744-52. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000715.
5
Exploring perceptions and experiences of Bolivian health researchers with research ethics.探索玻利维亚健康研究人员对研究伦理的看法和经历。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Apr;10(2):185-95. doi: 10.1177/1556264615576903. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
6
Curricular aspects of the Fogarty bioethics international training programs.福格蒂生物伦理学国际培训项目的课程方面
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Apr;9(2):12-23. doi: 10.1525/jer.2014.9.2.12.
7
Methodological issues in Internet-mediated research: a randomized comparison of internet versus mailed questionnaires.互联网介导研究中的方法学问题:互联网问卷与邮寄问卷的随机比较
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 4;13(4):e109. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1593.
8
Training needs assessment in research ethics evaluation among research ethics committee members in three African countries: Cameroon, Mali and Tanzania.在三个非洲国家(喀麦隆、马里和坦桑尼亚)的研究伦理委员会成员中进行研究伦理评估的培训需求评估。
Dev World Bioeth. 2010 Aug;10(2):88-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2009.00266.x. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
9
A Meta-Analysis of Ethics Instruction Effectiveness in the Sciences.科学领域伦理教育有效性的荟萃分析。
Ethics Behav. 2009 Sep 1;19(5):379-402. doi: 10.1080/10508420903035380.
10
Education of ethics committee members: experiences from Croatia.伦理委员会成员的培训:来自克罗地亚的经验
J Med Ethics. 2006 Mar;32(3):138-42. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.011643.