• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

嗓音障碍治疗前后自我评估比较问卷(CSAD)的验证:初步结果

Validation of the Comparative pre/post-treatment Self-Assessment of Dysphonia (CSAD) questionnaire: preliminary results.

作者信息

Ricci-Maccarini Andrea, Morolli Federica, Di Prinzio Giuseppe, Fantini Marco, Natale Erennio, Magnani Massimo, Stacchini Marco

机构信息

ENT Unit, Surgical Department, Bufalini Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Cesena, Forlì-Cesena, Italy.

ENT and Audiology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2025 Apr;45(2):94-99. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N3175.

DOI:10.14639/0392-100X-N3175
PMID:40353480
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12068516/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to show preliminary results of the validation the Comparative pre/post-treatment Self-Assessment of Dysphonia (CSAD) questionnaire in assessing vocal quality and phonatory fatigue following treatment for dysphonia.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 51 patients who underwent phonosurgery for various vocal diseases. Patients completed the CSAD questionnaire post-treatment, alongside the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10) administered before and after treatment. Correlation analyses were performed between CSAD scores and differences in pre- and post-treatment VHI-10 scores.

RESULTS

The CSAD demonstrated simplicity and ease of interpretation, requiring no pre-treatment administration. Despite its streamlined nature, it exhibited a satisfactory level of correlation with post-treatment VHI-10 scores, indicating its effectiveness in evaluating treatment outcomes for dysphonia.

CONCLUSIONS

The CSAD emerges as a simple yet effective tool for self-assessing vocal quality and phonatory fatigue after treatment in patients with dysphonia. Its straightforwardness and post-treatment administration make it a manageable and valuable addition to clinical practice, streamlining assessment processes without compromising accuracy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在展示验证嗓音障碍治疗前后比较自我评估问卷(CSAD)在评估嗓音障碍治疗后嗓音质量和发声疲劳方面的初步结果。

方法

对51例因各种嗓音疾病接受嗓音手术的患者进行回顾性分析。患者在治疗后完成CSAD问卷,同时在治疗前后进行嗓音障碍指数(VHI - 10)评估。对CSAD评分与治疗前后VHI - 10评分差异进行相关性分析。

结果

CSAD表现出简单易懂的特点,无需治疗前评估。尽管其结构简化,但与治疗后VHI - 10评分具有令人满意的相关性,表明其在评估嗓音障碍治疗效果方面的有效性。

结论

CSAD是一种简单而有效的工具,可用于嗓音障碍患者治疗后自我评估嗓音质量和发声疲劳。其简单性和治疗后评估的特点使其成为临床实践中易于管理且有价值的补充,在不影响准确性的情况下简化了评估过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed8d/12068516/122290b2d732/aoi-2025-02-94-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed8d/12068516/004302cccac6/aoi-2025-02-94-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed8d/12068516/f4e505b05b2c/aoi-2025-02-94-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed8d/12068516/122290b2d732/aoi-2025-02-94-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed8d/12068516/004302cccac6/aoi-2025-02-94-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed8d/12068516/f4e505b05b2c/aoi-2025-02-94-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed8d/12068516/122290b2d732/aoi-2025-02-94-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the Comparative pre/post-treatment Self-Assessment of Dysphonia (CSAD) questionnaire: preliminary results.嗓音障碍治疗前后自我评估比较问卷(CSAD)的验证:初步结果
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2025 Apr;45(2):94-99. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N3175.
2
Characteristics of the Voice Handicap Index for Patients With Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis Who Underwent Arytenoid Adduction.单侧声带麻痹患者行杓状软骨内收术后嗓音障碍指数量表的特征。
J Voice. 2020 Jul;34(4):649.e1-649.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.12.012. Epub 2019 Jan 5.
3
The applicability of the dysphonia severity index and the voice handicap index in evaluating effects of voice therapy and phonosurgery.嗓音障碍严重指数和嗓音障碍指数在评估嗓音治疗和语音手术效果中的适用性。
J Voice. 2010 Mar;24(2):199-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.06.007. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
4
Voice Self-assessment Protocols: Different Trends Among Organic and Behavioral Dysphonias.嗓音自我评估方案:器质性与功能性嗓音障碍的不同趋势
J Voice. 2017 Jan;31(1):112.e13-112.e27. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 May 19.
5
The Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French and the Voice Handicap Index.《嗓音障碍指数(第 03.01 版)》,法语版和《嗓音障碍指数》。
J Voice. 2020 Jul;34(4):646.e1-646.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.11.017. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
6
Factors predicting patient perception of dysphonia caused by benign vocal fold lesions.预测患者对良性声带病变所致发声困难感知的因素。
Laryngoscope. 2004 Oct;114(10):1693-700. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200410000-00004.
7
Assessment of the voice handicap index as a screening tool in dysphonic patients.评估嗓音障碍指数作为嗓音障碍患者筛查工具的情况。
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2011;63(5):269-72. doi: 10.1159/000324214. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
8
VHI-10 and SVHI-10 Differences in Singers' Self-perception of Dysphonia Severity.歌手对嗓音障碍严重程度自我认知方面的VHI - 10与SVHI - 10差异
J Voice. 2017 May;31(3):383.e1-383.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.08.017. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
9
Correlation of the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) and Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) in patients with dysphonia.嗓音障碍指数 10 项(VHI-10)与嗓音相关生活质量(V-RQOL)在发音障碍患者中的相关性。
J Voice. 2014 Mar;28(2):237-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.07.015. Epub 2013 Dec 8.
10
Vocal Function Exercises for Muscle Tension Dysphonia: Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation and Self-Assessment Rating.肌肉紧张性发声障碍的嗓音功能训练:听觉-感知评估与自我评估评级
J Voice. 2017 Jul;31(4):506.e25-506.e31. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Dec 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Consensus for voice quality assessment in clinical practice: guidelines of the European Laryngological Society and Union of the European Phoniatricians.临床实践中嗓音质量评估的共识:欧洲喉科学会和欧洲小儿语音治疗师协会指南
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Dec;280(12):5459-5473. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08211-6. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
2
Development and Validation of the Children's Voice Handicap Index-10 for Parents.儿童嗓音障碍指数-10家长版的开发与验证
J Voice. 2016 Jan;30(1):120-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.10.004. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
3
Validation of the Italian Voice Handicap Index-10.
验证意大利嗓音障碍指数-10。
J Voice. 2014 Mar;28(2):263.e17-263.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
4
Development and validation of the children's voice handicap index-10 (CVHI-10).儿童嗓音障碍指数-10(CVHI-10)的制定与验证。
J Voice. 2013 Mar;27(2):258.e23-258.e28. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
5
A comparison of the voice handicap index-10 scores between medical and musical theater students.医学专业学生和音乐剧专业学生的嗓音障碍指数-10 评分比较。
J Voice. 2013 Jan;27(1):129.e21-129.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.08.009. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
6
Adaptation and validation of the Italian Pediatric Voice Handicap Index.意大利儿童嗓音障碍指数的改编与验证
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2011;63(1):9-14. doi: 10.1159/000319730. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
7
Validation and cultural modification of Arabic voice handicap index.阿拉伯语音障碍指数的验证和文化调适。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Nov;267(11):1743-51. doi: 10.1007/s00405-010-1296-x. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
8
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the voice handicap index into Brazilian Portuguese.跨文化调适与巴西葡萄牙语文献声语障碍指数之验证。
J Voice. 2011 May;25(3):354-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.09.007. Epub 2010 May 1.
9
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Voice Handicap Index into Italian.嗓音障碍指数的跨文化调适与义大利验证。
J Voice. 2010 Nov;24(6):708-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.05.006. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
10
Diagnostic validity of Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) compared with perceptive-auditory and acoustic speech pathology evaluations of the voice.嗓音障碍指数 10 项(VHI-10)与感知听觉和声学语音病理学评估嗓音的诊断有效性比较。
J Voice. 2010 Nov;24(6):715-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.03.006.